Drone Research Team

WITNESSES => Witnesses identified - LMH Report complete => Topic started by: elevenaugust on May 10, 2008, 01:55:01 PM

Title: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: elevenaugust on May 10, 2008, 01:55:01 PM
Linda Moulton Howe interview; Earthfiles:
http://www.earthfiles.com (http://www.earthfiles.com)
Podcast:
http://www.earthfiles333.com/earthfiles/Episode19mp3.html (http://www.earthfiles333.com/earthfiles/Episode19mp3.html)

Ted Connors drone sighting
From Earthfiles June 29th 2007


5:45 AM, Montgomery, Alabama, near Maxwell AFB

With this concept of an extraterrestrial technology that can neutralize gravity and project holographic-like 3-dimensional images that can record data for whatever unknown reason, here is what happened this week on Monday, June 25th, 2007, 6 miles from Maxwell AFB and its Gunter AFB Annex in Montgomery, Alabama. The eyewitness is a long-time technical specialist in security, educated about infrared frequency technologies and normal human aviation. Because his work is highly sensitive, he has asked that I not use his actual name. So, I will call him Ted Connors.

Ted said that the local Montgomery news media announced last week there would be joint Army/Air Force exercises at Maxwell AFB with lots of planes and helicopters, beginning on Sunday, June 24th, around 8 PM. Ted said the noise was terrible and unrelenting through Monday night, June 25, while he was on duty in his security work that involves 32 infrared cameras.
Interview:

Ted Connors (alias), Technical Specialist in Security, Montgomery, Alabama: "During the night of Monday, June 25th, I patrolled a compound where I'm in charge of security. A lot of noise all night long. But early in the morning - it was probably about 5:45 AM, because the sun had not come up yet and it was still dark and within 6 miles of Maxwell AFB.
YOU'RE AWARE OF ALL THE MIITARY ACTIVITY IN THE SKY. YOU ARE WORKING IN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT KIND OF TECHNOLOGIES?
Infrared cameras, high frequency infrared technology for a company.

DO YOU HAVE A WHOLE BANK OF MONITORING SCREENS FOR THE INFRARED?
Correct.

IS THIS WHAT YOU WERE LOOKING AT ON OR ABOUT 6 AM ON MONDAY, JUNE 25TH?
That would be correct.

SO, WHAT HAPPENED?
Well, at that particular time, I was outside. I just glanced up because I will normally do that just to check. This equipment I'm telling you about is mounted up high within 20 to 30 feet (above ground). I was doing a normal check when I noticed beside a tree what looked like a ring. I thought somebody had thrown a hub cab up in the tree. And I moved to one side to look at it - it was just before daylight, the sun was coming up. So you could see, but you could not really make out a lot of detail.

So, as I looked around, I could see this thing. It was not attached to the tree. It was not in the tree. It was to the side of the tree! And it had these elongated wires that stuck out of the top and just sort of curved and went up and sort of disappeared. They looked like they just sort of faded out. They didn't stop, they just faded out.

As I looked at an angle, I could see it looked like a tail rotor on a helicopter made up of (a connected series of) shapes like fan blades, like a ceiling fan. I thought, 'This is weird!' I could see because of the streetlights in the area and high mercury vapor lights, I could see patterns on the bottom of it that looked like blotches. It looked like some type of hieroglyphics.

IT'S ON THOSE CONNECTED SEGMENTS THAT YOU SAW THE 'HIEROGLYPHICS?'
Right, correct.

HOW HIGH ABOVE YOU AND HOW FAR OUT IS THIS FROM YOU?
I would estimate somewhere around altitude-wise about 40 to 60 feet and probably a few yards away, probably 30 or 40 yards off in the distance.

BUT CLOSE ENOUGH THAT YOU CAN SEE - I'LL CALL IT GRAPHIC DETAIL - ON THE BOTTOM?
Right, correct. I could actually make out the symbols, especially on the paddle part that stuck out.

ON THE CHAD DRONE PHOTOGRAPHS AND ON THE CAPITOLA, CALIFORNIA, WHICH CURRENTLY ARE THE TWO BLOCKS OF PHOTOGRAPHS PRIOR TO JUNE 2007, WHICH SHOWED LETTERING ON WHAT EVERYBODY HAS BEEN CALLING THE 'LONG TAIL' SECTION. IS THAT WHAT YOU MEAN BY PADDLE?
Right. Right. It appeared to me like a series of ceiling fan blades that were attached (to each other). It had that same contour like they were sloped on one end and wider toward the end. Then they were connected together. I couldn't make out whether it was three or four, but it looked like they were inner-connected by some type of a wire or some type of bar that connected them together.

When I saw this thing, it was like, 'Oh, my God!' It was staring at me!! It just gave me the heebie jeebies.

SO YOU HAD THE FEELING THAT THIS MIGHT ACTUALLY BE MONITORING YOU SPECIFICALLY?
Exactly.

WHICH IS WHAT THE MAN IN ARIZONA THAT I CALL 'NED WHITE' IN 1995 - HE WAS NOT FAR FROM HEBER, ARIZONA. AND HE SEES ONE OF THESE (DRONES) AND HAD THE DISTINCT IMPRESSION THAT IT WAS MONITORING OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE THERE ACROSS A MEADOW FROM WHERE HE WAS AND IT ACTUALLY SANK DOWN BEHIND TREES AS IF IT WERE ON SURREPTITIOUS SURVEILLANCE.
Yeah, that's what I felt like. Doing that type of work myself, I know what it feels like to be under surveillance. I have night vision equipment and all this other stuff. That's what I do. And I felt like this thing was watching me. I had this gut feeling that this thing is either taking pictures of me or it's looking at me, scanning, and that was the feeling that I had. I just had this feeling that this thing knew I was there and it was watching me.

I sort of stood there and looked at it for a while. It did not move. It did not make any noise at all.

THE TAIL WAS CONNECTED TO A RING?
Right, the ring appeared to be - from where I was standing, it's hard to judge. To me it was like a hubcap, but I know it was bigger than that. I would probably have been the size of a 50-gallon drum in diameter.

SO, THE WHOLE LENGTH OF THIS PARTICULAR "DRONE" WOULD BE HOW LONG?
From what I call the wheel portion back to the tail, I would probably say no more than 15 to 20 feet long (the tail length).

YOU KNOW THAT BECAUSE YOU ARE CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE AERIAL DRONE AND THE TREE THAT YOU HAVE SOME KIND OF WAY TO JUDGE THE SIZE OF IT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE TREE?
Right, because it was a large oak tree directly in its path and it seemed to be hovering over the oak tree. Now as far as the distance between the top of the oak tree and the device, I could not tell. It was hard to tell because it was off at an angle. But it seemed like maybe 20 or 30 feet at the maximum from the tree.

UP IN THE AIR ABOVE IT?
Right, correct.
WAS THIS ABSOLUTELY STATIONARY? OR, WAS THERE ANY MOTION AT ALL?
I saw no motion whatsoever. It was absolutely stationary. At that point, I had my cell phone, which has a camera and I grabbed the cell phone and tried to take a picture - actually tried to take three pictures. It was still dark enough that I couldn't get a good picture. I even tried to increase the light sensitivity on my cell phone camera so maybe that would help. But they all came out just kind of blurry black looking. So, I gave up on that idea and put the cell phone back in its case in a holder around my waist.

And that's when it started to move. Its movement was really, really slow. It moved to the west at a very slow rate, maybe 2 mph or 1 mph, something like that.

WAS THE RING AT THE FRONT OF THE FORWARD MOTION?
Yes, it was. It actually moved like you move forward in an airplane in which as you move forward, the tail follows the engine - or what I call the tail, which was those paddles that followed it.

It also looked like it had protruding antennae, but I couldn't tell. They weren't very large, not much larger than the wires sticking from he top. There were quite a few wires sticking out of this thing from the top.

HOW HIGH DO YOU THINK THOSE WIRES ON TOP WENT UP INTO THE AIR?
Probably 3 to 4 feet off the surface of that ring. (Combined with his 15 to 20 feet length estimate of the tale, pretty close to the 25-feet estimate by other eyewitnesses.)

OF ALL THE IMAGES THAT HAVE SURFACED PUBLICLY SO FAR, WHICH ONE IS CLOSEST TO WHAT YOU SAW THIS WEEK NEAR MAXWELL AFB?
The one I'm looking at on your Earthfiles "Part 1: Explanation of the Strange Craft Sightings" and you have a photograph by Chad. That one really - if I had to guess closest match to what I saw, it would be that Chad photograph (by the yellow flowers), that's the closest one.

The one thing, Linda, this thing did that was sort of odd to me, when it moved - the first time it moved, and I watched it as it advanced - when it started to move, it was like a double image. How can I explain this?

LIKE YOU WERE SEEING A DOUBLE EXPOSURE?
Yeah! Yeah! Exactly. It moved and you saw it one place, but you also saw it where it was before. Like two places at once, almost. And that's the only time it did that was when it initially moved. Then after the movement started, I didn't see that anymore.

IN THE ISAAC INFORMATION THAT EMERGED ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, DESCRIBED THIS AS EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY ORIGINALLY THAT HAS THE ABILITY TO CLOAK SO SUCCESSFULLY THAT IT CAN REMAIN INVISIBLE UNLESS THERE ARE JAMMING FREQUENCIES THAT INTERFERE AND ANOTHER HUGE PART OF THE COMPONENTS THAT RELATE TO THIS DRAGONFLY "DRONE" IS THAT IT CAN PROJECT 3-DIMENSIONAL IMAGES.
When I saw it, Linda, it blew my mind! I'm pretty grounded. I have to be for what I do for a living.

THE QUESTION WE WOULD ALL LIKE ANSWERED: ARE THEY BACK-ENGINEERED BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING ABILITIES FROM THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, AS ISAAC HAS SAID? OR ARE WE STILL SEEING LITERAL EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY AT WORK?
My question is: how can this thing move without making noise? There was absolutely no noise at all. Something in the air that does not make noise and moves is not right.

AND SO CLOSE TO YOU!
Right.

LET'S GO BACK TO THAT MICROSECOND IN YOUR MIND'S EYE RIGHT NOW WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE 'DRONE.' IT IS 20 FEET OR SO ABOVE THE OAK TREE AND IT'S ABSOLUTELY STILL. IT'S NOT MAKING ANY SOUND. THEN DESCRIBE EXACTLY WHAT YOU SEE HAPPEN.
It moved and that's when it did the double take. And it shifted approximately maybe two or three feet to the right.

THEN DID YOU SEE LIKE TWO IMAGES OF THIS THING?
Right, that's when I saw the two images. The image that was there where it originally was and then the image where it had moved to. I was seeing two things, and then the other one sort of blended into it. It was like it sort of sucked it (other image) towards it (front image in new location).

YOU'RE SEEING WHAT LOOKS LIKE SORT OF A MOTION GOING FORWARD TWO OR THREE FEET. AND THEN THERE ARE TWO IMAGES OF THIS RING. HOW DID IT MOVE FROM THAT POINT FORWARD AND WHAT HAPPENED?
It moved at exactly the same altitude. It did not go up and it didn't go down. But it slowly, at a couple mph, moved to the west. As it moved to the west, I followed it with my eyes, but there are so many trees where I'm at. It went over a tree line and just disappeared. Once it got past the trees, I could not see it anymore. As a matter of fact, I got in a vehicle to try to follow it, but the area where I'm at is so wooded you can't really see anything. I went two or three blocks and came back and that was it.

WHAT WAS IN THAT DIRECTION GOING WEST?
Maxwell AFB.

ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, WHEN ISAAC'S INFORMATION CAME OUT, AND YOU AND I TALKED ABOUT IT BRIEFLY, YOU MADE A CONNECTION BETWEEN ISAAC'S RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND ALL THE INFRARED. CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT?
What hit me the most was when I read the article, it said that this thing cloaks itself, but it can be jammed. And when I saw that, I knew I had all this equipment and I'm thinking, 'Could this possibly be the reason I saw it (drone)? Maybe I wouldn't have seen it if I did not have the equipment around me that was active? Possibly had it been turned off, would I have seen anything? Or maybe not. I thought maybe infrared will detect it.

HOW MANY OF THESE DRAGONFLY-SHAPED DRONES ARE IN THE SKIES OF THIS PLANET IN BOTH HEMISPHERES AND NOBODY KNOWS BECAUSE THEY ARE INVISIBLE?
Yeah, that's the scary thing. I honestly have never seen anything like this before like this thing. It's so different, but it doesn't appear to be like a UFO. It appears to be like it's clean - it's almost scary clean.

If this thing shows up again, if I have to climb up on a stepladder with a flashlight and get a picture of this thing, I'm going to get a picture of this thing and prove once and for all that this blooming thing exists!

This thing is real! I know what I saw and I know it's real! I don't think it's extraterrestrial in usage. I think it's our people that are using it, our government, or whoever. But I think that the technology is definitely extraterrestrial. Nothing flies like this - nothing I've ever seen moves and leaves a signature and then moves and the signature moves from where it was over to where it is now and disappears. I mean, your mind won't register that! (laughs) It just doesn't add up."

Could the silence so often reported by human eyewitnesses of high strangeness in the skies be because what's seen is not always 3-dimensional matter as we know it, but a sophisticated image projection that can record data from us and our planet?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 22, 2010, 02:31:16 AM
I am Ted Connors. I will be happy to answer any and all questions you may have in regards to this event. Please feel free to express your feelings and thoughts. After almost 3 years this journey continues for me to find the TRUTH !!!  Thanks,  TC
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on April 22, 2010, 03:48:33 AM
Thanks to Ted working with me, I have recreated an image of what he saw that morning:

(http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/images/thumb/e/ea/Treescene.jpg/450px-Treescene.jpg) (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Image:Treescene.jpg)

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: mgrandin on April 22, 2010, 05:24:35 PM
I am Ted Connors. I will be happy to answer any and all questions you may have in regards to this event. Please feel free to express your feelings and thoughts. After almost 3 years this journey continues for me to find the TRUTH !!!  Thanks,  TC

Hi Ted! 

None appears having begun asking you questions yet -
so I will try beginning: 

Do you believe in other drone sightings? Do you believe in all of them or are there some you don't believe in?  (Maybe this is not exactly in regard to your report, but interesting knowing your opinion).   :)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on April 22, 2010, 07:44:44 PM
First of all, welcome Ted, you sure are among friends here! What a great opportunity for us all to ask questions of your sighting!

I would like to ask the following questions:

*Did you see any light coming from the drone?

*Was it like the "real" thing to you, or did it seem like some sort of projection? (The double vision in menté)
 
*Did you happen to see, if your cellphone was online or out of cell reach when you tried to take the photo's?

I am very pleased to make your aquaintance and I am hoping for a great collaboration to find the truth about the "drones".

My very best to you for making your knowledge available for us,
EVS

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Atrueoriginall on April 22, 2010, 08:02:54 PM
Ted is probably at work still since it's 3pm ET his time right now.  I'm anxious to ask questions as well.  Will check back soon.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Nodnunk on April 22, 2010, 10:13:56 PM
Maybe you could indicate on a map where you were located and which way you were looking during this sighting.
A map showing Montgomery and Maxwell AFB can be found at the link given below. You can use the zoom feature to locate your position. You may also want to select one of the two aerial views.

http://www.bing.com/maps/?mkt=en-us#JnE9eXAubW9udGdvbWVyeSUyYythbCU3ZXNzdC4wJTdlcGcuMSZiYj02MC45NDcxOTAzMDAxNzk5JTdlLTMyLjAzMjIwMzY3NCU3ZTYuMDg3NDY3NzQ4MzE2NDElN2UtMTIzLjk2NTc5NzQyNA== (http://www.bing.com/maps/?mkt=en-us#JnE9eXAubW9udGdvbWVyeSUyYythbCU3ZXNzdC4wJTdlcGcuMSZiYj02MC45NDcxOTAzMDAxNzk5JTdlLTMyLjAzMjIwMzY3NCU3ZTYuMDg3NDY3NzQ4MzE2NDElN2UtMTIzLjk2NTc5NzQyNA==)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 23, 2010, 03:51:22 PM
I am Ted Connors. I will be happy to answer any and all questions you may have in regards to this event. Please feel free to express your feelings and thoughts. After almost 3 years this journey continues for me to find the TRUTH !!!  Thanks,  TC

Hi Ted! 

None appears having begun asking you questions yet -
so I will try beginning: 

Do you believe in other drone sightings? Do you believe in all of them or are there some you don't believe in?  (Maybe this is not exactly in regard to your report, but interesting knowing your opinion).   :)
Yes i do believe in other sightings. In regards to if i believe in all or are there some i don't, i would have to say you have to look at all the info provided and the eyewitness accounts. Some, just as in my case, the only real thing there is to go on is the eyewitness account and whatever other info that has been collected. Some contain photos that are clearly questionable but i was not there so who am i to say if these are real or CGI or Photoshop. I would have to defer to the experts on these. The thing i know for SURE is that my sighting has been a life changing event and i continue to drive myself to find the TRUTH. I hope this answers your questions and thanks for asking.    Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 23, 2010, 04:06:01 PM
First of all, welcome Ted, you sure are among friends here! What a great opportunity for us all to ask questions of your sighting!

I would like to ask the following questions:

*Did you see any light coming from the drone?

*Was it like the "real" thing to you, or did it seem like some sort of projection? (The double vision in menté)
 
*Did you happen to see, if your cellphone was online or out of cell reach when you tried to take the photo's?

I am very pleased to make your aquaintance and I am hoping for a great collaboration to find the truth about the "drones".

My very best to you for making your knowledge available for us,
EVS

 Thanks, Great Questions. I saw no light from the Drone. It seemed very REAL and it seemed very EVIL. As far as projection, it had some qualities such as the movement i described in my interview with LMH that you might say made it appear as a projected image. Yes my cell phone had full bars and was fully charged but it was still so dark that without a flash or some backlighting it just would not give anything but a solid black image. Thank you so much for your support & belief and i hope for ALL of us that we find the TRUTH.      Thanks, Ted

Edited to fix quoting
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 23, 2010, 04:07:35 PM
Ted is probably at work still since it's 3pm ET his time right now.  I'm anxious to ask questions as well.  Will check back soon.
Looking forward to hearing back from you. Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 23, 2010, 04:28:33 PM
Maybe you could indicate on a map where you were located and which way you were looking during this sighting.
A map showing Montgomery and Maxwell AFB can be found at the link given below. You can use the zoom feature to locate your position. You may also want to select one of the two aerial views.

http://www.bing.com/maps/?mkt=en-us#JnE9eXAubW9udGdvbWVyeSUyYythbCU3ZXNzdC4wJTdlcGcuMSZiYj02MC45NDcxOTAzMDAxNzk5JTdlLTMyLjAzMjIwMzY3NCU3ZTYuMDg3NDY3NzQ4MzE2NDElN2UtMTIzLjk2NTc5NzQyNA== (http://www.bing.com/maps/?mkt=en-us#JnE9eXAubW9udGdvbWVyeSUyYythbCU3ZXNzdC4wJTdlcGcuMSZiYj02MC45NDcxOTAzMDAxNzk5JTdlLTMyLjAzMjIwMzY3NCU3ZTYuMDg3NDY3NzQ4MzE2NDElN2UtMTIzLjk2NTc5NzQyNA==)
Due to the nature of my work and the security issues involved, at this time i cannot give this info, as much as i would like to because i feel it has a strong bearing on my sighting. Just as we had to do an artist's rendering of the tree because i am not allowed to take pictures with my personal camera of the area i work in. I was taking a real risk by trying to get pictures with my cellphone. This is one of the things that bothers me most is the fact that i had all these hi tech cameras at my disposal and could not make use of them for myself. Also, i have been asked if we got any images on our Digital Video Recorder?? the answer is no because all the cameras are set at a maximum level of the horizon and would not elevate any further. This is to keep from accidently burning out these very expensive cameras by pointing them directly at the sun. ( MURPHY'S LAW)!! I have only a few years until my retirement, but if there is any way i will divulge the location at that time for sure if it will help solve this mystery. Thanks and hope understand my situation.   Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: mgrandin on April 23, 2010, 04:58:50 PM
I am Ted Connors. I will be happy to answer any and all questions you may have in regards to this event. Please feel free to express your feelings and thoughts. After almost 3 years this journey continues for me to find the TRUTH !!!  Thanks,  TC

Hi Ted! 

None appears having begun asking you questions yet -
so I will try beginning: 

Do you believe in other drone sightings? Do you believe in all of them or are there some you don't believe in?  (Maybe this is not exactly in regard to your report, but interesting knowing your opinion).   :)
Yes i do believe in other sightings. In regards to if i believe in all or are there some i don't, i would have to say you have to look at all the info provided and the eyewitness accounts. Some, just as in my case, the only real thing there is to go on is the eyewitness account and whatever other info that has been collected. Some contain photos that are clearly questionable but i was not there so who am i to say if these are real or CGI or Photoshop. I would have to defer to the experts on these. The thing i know for SURE is that my sighting has been a life changing event and i continue to drive myself to find the TRUTH. I hope this answers your questions and thanks for asking.    Ted

Thanks for kind interesting answers, Ted. You make a very 
trustworthy impression.   8)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Nodnunk on April 23, 2010, 09:58:03 PM
Due to the nature of my work and the security issues involved, at this time i cannot give this info, as much as i would like to because i feel it has a strong bearing on my sighting.

[...] but if there is any way i will divulge the location at that time for sure if it will help solve this mystery.

OK, the location is an important aspect of your sighting but cannot be divulged.

In the interview at the top of this thread, you say that you are "in charge of security" for this compound. Does that designation and job description put you in a management category? If you are management, then you must have subordinates who report to you. Were any of these subordinates on site that Sunday/Monday shift or were you alone?

Edited to fix quoting
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 24, 2010, 03:41:59 AM
Due to the nature of my work and the security issues involved, at this time i cannot give this info, as much as i would like to because i feel it has a strong bearing on my sighting.

[...] but if there is any way i will divulge the location at that time for sure if it will help solve this mystery.

OK, the location is an important aspect of your sighting but cannot be divulged.

In the interview at the top of this thread, you say that you are "in charge of security" for this compound. Does that designation and job description put you in a management category? If you are management, then you must have subordinates who report to you. Were any of these subordinates on site that Sunday/Monday shift or were you alone?

Edited to fix quoting
Thanks for the question. To answer your question, we have a 2 person team. both of us share responsibility for the use care of the equipment and other duties. Neither of us are what you would consider management. Our directives come from a Security Chief who has overall control of the operations. We are not Military but function in the same manner as many Military units. My teammate was on engaged in other duties while this event took place as was not a witness. I did confide in him after the sighting and we spent sometime reviewing the DVAR recordings to see if anything was picked up by any of our cameras. We found nothing due to the restrictions of the cameras vertical limit to the horizon as i outlined in a previous response here in the forum.   Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 24, 2010, 04:01:37 AM
I want to take a moment to thank Linda Moulton Howe of Earthfiles.com for her help in my case. We spent weeks after my sighting on the phone and exchanging emails, going over my sighting and reviewing other sightings trying to find a common thread in all of these.We have stayed in contact over this time and she always shares the latest updates with me. Her work and belief in me and my story is what has driven me to continue my quest for the truth over the past 3 years. Her hard work, and dedication has been an inspiration. So Thanks Linda.      Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on April 24, 2010, 10:09:33 PM
Ted, thank you for answering my questions. Later on I'll tell you why I asked those questions.

Additionally I would like to ask this:

*About the emotions that you experienced, fear was the most pertruding, was it like this:
The Titanic is going under, and you are sure you are going to die, as the water fills the room you are in?

*Or, did it feel more like you needed to run away, as fast as possible?

*Did it feel like a command emotionally, that would avert you from what you were seeing?

Thanks,
EVS

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 24, 2010, 10:59:08 PM
Ted, thank you for answering my questions. Later on I'll tell you why I asked those questions.

Additionally I would like to ask this:

*About the emotions that you experienced, fear was the most pertruding, was it like this:
The Titanic is going under, and you are sure you are going to die, as the water fills the room you are in?

*Or, did it feel more like you needed to run away, as fast as possible?

*Did it feel like a command emotionally, that would avert you from what you were seeing?

Thanks,
EVS
The fear i experienced was from the feeling and possibly a telepathic message from this device that it was in charge and if it wanted it could make me do whatever it wanted. The only way i can explain it is that this thing was on the 'ULTIMATE POWER TRIP".   Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on April 24, 2010, 11:18:47 PM
Thanks again, Ted, for your answers.

I would like to know if you experienced a smell, like diesel, gas or any other fuel during your observation?

Or, taste an unusual taste?

And, was the area in which you were in, dense forest or similar, and did the environment somehow interact
with the sighting? (Deer running away, other animals showing strange behavior?)

Thanks,
EVS

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 24, 2010, 11:32:17 PM
Thanks again, Ted, for your answers.

I would like to know if you experienced a smell, like diesel, gas or any other fuel during your observation?

Or, taste an unusual taste?

And, was the area in which you were in, dense forest or similar, and did the environment somehow interact
with the sighting? (Deer running away, other animals showing strange behavior?)

Thanks,
EVS
The answer is NO to all three questions. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary except this Drone. Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on April 25, 2010, 12:59:15 AM
Thank you Ted, I have no further questions.

The reason I asked those questions, was solely to separate illusions from fact. I find you to be a trustworthy witness, as
your answers point much more to reality as to coincidence.

I strongly ask for you to hang on in here, as I'm sure there will be much more questions for you to answer.

Sincerely,

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 25, 2010, 02:18:22 AM
Thank you Ted, I have no further questions.

The reason I asked those questions, was solely to separate illusions from fact. I find you to be a trustworthy witness, as
your answers point much more to reality as to coincidence.

I strongly ask for you to hang on in here, as I'm sure there will be much more questions for you to answer.

Sincerely,

EVS
Thank you for your questions. I hope with the help of this forum we may find the reason and purpose of the Drones. As in the case of many mysteries it may also take disclosure from whoever or whatever is building, operating, and controlling these Mechanical or Biological Drone Devices. I want answers in my lifetime!

                                                                                                                     Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on April 27, 2010, 03:00:18 PM
In telephone and email conversations, Ted has described the state of the tree which the drone was hovering over. In the three years since the drone appeared, the tree has been dying from what appears to be pine blight.

Here is a rendering of what that tree looked like when the drone appeared in 2007 and now in 2010.

Photos of the tree are not permitted because they would reveal Ted's workplace.

Ted does not know if the drone caused this problem or not, but nevertheless, the state of the tree is recorded as part of his encounter.

(http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/images/thumb/e/eb/Dyingtree.jpg/415px-Dyingtree.jpg)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Ipsy on April 28, 2010, 12:51:14 AM
Is the condition of this tree unique among other trees in the area? Are there other trees of the same species very near this tree which have not experienced this blight?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 28, 2010, 02:17:53 AM
Is the condition of this tree unique among other trees in the area? Are there other trees of the same species very near this tree which have not experienced this blight?
This is the only tree in the area that i have been able to locate that has this condition. There are other pines very close to this one and they all appear very healthy, but i am no tree expert, so i am sure someone with that sort of expertise would know for sure.  Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on April 28, 2010, 08:11:00 PM
Idea; why doesn't the DRT get Ted a geiger counter the range from $50 to $150 and are pocket sized now and let him check the tree out or knock off a little bark and get it tested by the DRT?

Just a thought. If it shows up with some radioactivity then you have your first bit of physical evidence and it could all be done without compromising Ted's position.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Ipsy on April 28, 2010, 11:14:15 PM
Thanks Ted for answering my question.
I re-read your interview with Linda and I have another question. In that interview you referred to the tree as a large oak. Have I missed an explanation about the tree type somewhere? We are now discussing that it is a pine right? I'm no tree expert, but those are very different and easily distinguished types of trees.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 29, 2010, 12:10:20 AM
Thanks Ted for answering my question.
I re-read your interview with Linda and I have another question. In that interview you referred to the tree as a large oak. Have I missed an explanation about the tree type somewhere? We are now discussing that it is a pine right? I'm no tree expert, but those are very different and easily distinguished types of trees.
It was a pine. and not an Oak. I didn't catch that myself in the original interview. good point!! I can't remember if i described it as an Oak to LMH at the time or She just stated the wrong type of tree. But it is a Pine for sure.    Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 29, 2010, 12:16:19 AM
Idea; why doesn't the DRT get Ted a geiger counter the range from $50 to $150 and are pocket sized now and let him check the tree out or knock off a little bark and get it tested by the DRT?

Just a thought. If it shows up with some radioactivity then you have your first bit of physical evidence and it could all be done without compromising Ted's position.
I am open to anything as long as it does not draw the attention of my Superiors or is detected by our own surveillance equipment.                            Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 29, 2010, 12:18:40 AM
Thanks Ted for answering my question.
I re-read your interview with Linda and I have another question. In that interview you referred to the tree as a large oak. Have I missed an explanation about the tree type somewhere? We are now discussing that it is a pine right? I'm no tree expert, but those are very different and easily distinguished types of trees.
It was a pine. and not an Oak. I didn't catch that myself in the original interview. good point!! I can't remember if i described it as an Oak to LMH at the time or She just stated the wrong type of tree. But it is a Pine for sure.    Thanks, Ted
I will go back and listen to the Audio Interview as it has been a long time since i have even listened to it.                         Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 29, 2010, 01:46:04 AM
Thanks Ted for answering my question.
I re-read your interview with Linda and I have another question. In that interview you referred to the tree as a large oak. Have I missed an explanation about the tree type somewhere? We are now discussing that it is a pine right? I'm no tree expert, but those are very different and easily distinguished types of trees.
It was a pine. and not an Oak. I didn't catch that myself in the original interview. good point!! I can't remember if i described it as an Oak to LMH at the time or She just stated the wrong type of tree. But it is a Pine for sure.    Thanks, Ted
I will go back and listen to the Audio Interview as it has been a long time since i have even listened to it.                         Thanks,  Ted
I stand corrected, i did say OAK in the Audio. It is a PINE. I guess it was a mistake in the excitement of the moment. Not to use as an excuse, but at the time of the interview, my mind was racing from the experience. Thanks for pointing this out.                                                     Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Ipsy on April 29, 2010, 10:54:50 PM
Thanks Ted for clarifying that!

As I continue to think about it, I have more questions.

1) You mentioned that the surveillance equipment you were using would not have been able to capture the drone due to it's orientation in relation to the horizon. Surely though, a place using such high tech surveillance would have other types of surveillance cameras. I would expect there to be some number of ordinary surveillance cameras around, possibly even other types of surveillance equipment besides cameras, motion detectors, other sensors, etc. Could any other equipment have captured evidence of the drone's presence?

2) I imagine, though that an ordinary surveillance camera would not be able to capture much in the dark, but do you think it's possible to have captured even a faint glimpse of something. Can you elaborate on what other types of surveillance equipment you use? I understand if you can't for security reasons, but it would be interesting to know.

3) Does your job allow you to review all of the surveillance data that you collect? Are you allowed to review recordings, or do you simply monitor the equipment and someone else analysis it?

4) I take it that your relationship with your employer is such that you would not feel comfortable discussing your sighting with them. Have you in fact discussed it with your superiors, or anyone else that you work with? What sort of reaction would you expect from them if you told them what you saw?

5) Perhaps the drone has appeared in the vicinity at other times when you weren't there. Times that may have been captured on tape. Do you think they would be willing to review, or allow you to review archive surveillance footage? Maybe the drone has appeared closer to the ground on another occasion where it could have been captured by the IR cameras.

6) What's your opinion of the nature of work that your employer does. I realize you can't divulge anything that might compromise your anonymity, or bring attention to your employer. But, do you think it's possible that they know about the drones? Could they secretly be aware of the drone activity or even involved with it?

Thanks again for all of your time and consideration in answering our questions!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 01, 2010, 04:47:31 AM
Thanks Ted for clarifying that!

As I continue to think about it, I have more questions.

1) You mentioned that the surveillance equipment you were using would not have been able to capture the drone due to it's orientation in relation to the horizon. Surely though, a place using such high tech surveillance would have other types of surveillance cameras. I would expect there to be some number of ordinary surveillance cameras around, possibly even other types of surveillance equipment besides cameras, motion detectors, other sensors, etc. Could any other equipment have captured evidence of the drone's presence?

2) I imagine, though that an ordinary surveillance camera would not be able to capture much in the dark, but do you think it's possible to have captured even a faint glimpse of something. Can you elaborate on what other types of surveillance equipment you use? I understand if you can't for security reasons, but it would be interesting to know.

3) Does your job allow you to review all of the surveillance data that you collect? Are you allowed to review recordings, or do you simply monitor the equipment and someone else analysis it?

4) I take it that your relationship with your employer is such that you would not feel comfortable discussing your sighting with them. Have you in fact discussed it with your superiors, or anyone else that you work with? What sort of reaction would you expect from them if you told them what you saw?

5) Perhaps the drone has appeared in the vicinity at other times when you weren't there. Times that may have been captured on tape. Do you think they would be willing to review, or allow you to review archive surveillance footage? Maybe the drone has appeared closer to the ground on another occasion where it could have been captured by the IR cameras.

6) What's your opinion of the nature of work that your employer does. I realize you can't divulge anything that might compromise your anonymity, or bring attention to your employer. But, do you think it's possible that they know about the drones? Could they secretly be aware of the drone activity or even involved with it?

Thanks again for all of your time and consideration in answering our questions!
Thanks for the questions.
1. The location of my sighting is in a remote area. There are only 2 cameras with coverage there. 1 is of the PTZ (Pan, Tilt, Zoom) type and the other is a Fixed Mount. Both of these are IR types. There are also other detection devices in the same area, but none were triggered during this event. All the devices were double checked after my sighting by my partner and myself and all were found to be in working order. I cannot go into detail on the nature of these devices, but will say they are of a Hi Tech nature.

2. You can refer to my answers in question 1. on this. I will add that at the time i thought we may have been able to capture something on this other equipment, but to my supprise there was nothing recorded.

3. The answer to this question is Yes. We have the authority to review all data collected on all equipment and document any extra comments that we feel need to be added.

4.The answer is Yes. At first i had some hesitation, but is my duty and responsibility to report ANYTHING that occurs during my duty shift. My partner also reported our actions of that morning even though he had no sighting of this craft himself. The reaction of my superior was one of thanks for reporting what i saw and documenting the incident. No other questions were asked and the subject was closed.

5. Good Question. I did not pursue that option with my superiors, but thinking back on it, i wish i had asked for further review.

6. At this time i cannot comment on that. I will say that due to the nature of our mission this incident deserves much further review.

Thank you again for your questions,                                                  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 02, 2010, 09:53:48 PM
Regarding the basic shape of the drone that Ted sighted, I have been emailing Ted privately to collect enough details to put into one post. I asked Ted, "from your original interview with Linda, you mentioned that the object may have protruding antennae as in this paragraph from the original interview".

Quote from: Ted_original_interview
"It also looked like it had protruding antennae, but I couldn't tell.  They weren't very large, not much larger than the wires sticking from he  top. There were quite a few wires sticking out of this thing from the top."

I pointed Ted to the Raj and Isaac antennae sticking out from the two modules, and asked if it looked similar, Ted explains:

Quote from: ted_email
"... I only saw 2 antennae per module, but the same configuration of modules in the same location, ( The length looks about right) on the "front" ( i guess), of the craft."


Also, regarding the patterns on the bottom of the drone. Ted wrote this:

Quote from: ted_email
"All the symbols were on the "Fan Blade" tail of the drone."

Quote from: ted_email
"I just wish i could remember them all. Only a couple come back to me vividly. One looked like a half black circle with the capital letter L on it's side to the right of it. The other reminded me of a French Curl ruler like you get in a Compass and Protractor kit that we used in high school."

Ted found the French curve image on the Internet and forwarded it to me. He also pointed out the following symbols which he recognized. From all of this I made the composite image which Ted agreed looked like what he saw:

(http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/images/thumb/9/9f/TedConnorsShape.png/692px-TedConnorsShape.png)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 03, 2010, 03:28:42 AM
Thanks, "onthefence". My deepest gratitude for giving life to my description of this craft. It is the picture i tried to take and never got. Finally i can show this and say " Here is exactly what i saw" !!!! Thank you for the hours of hard work i know you have spent on this.  Every piece of this puzzle brings me one step closer to resolving this for myself and hopefully helping others who have had this amazing and in some cases frightening experience.

                                                                                                                       Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Ipsy on May 03, 2010, 06:55:11 PM
Thank you Ted, for answering my questions! I'm very busy at the moment, but when I have time to continue thinking about it, I'm sure I can think of a few more questions. Thanks!!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: HPO on May 03, 2010, 09:05:48 PM
Thanks, "onthefence". My deepest gratitude for giving life to my description of this craft. It is the picture i tried to take and never got. Finally i can show this and say " Here is exactly what i saw" !!!! Thank you for the hours of hard work i know you have spent on this.  Every piece of this puzzle brings me one step closer to resolving this for myself and hopefully helping others who have had this amazing and in some cases frightening experience.

                                                                                                                       Thanks, Ted

Hello Ted,

First of all welcome to this forum Ted, good to have you here.
As a completion to the great photoshop image from onthefence, please find below a download link to a zip file which contains a 3D pdf file of the drone you saw, I've modelled it after the composite image from onthefence.

You need an updated version of acrobat reader to view this file, you can rotate the model when pressing and holding the left mouse button and move the mouse.
To zoom in and out you have to scroll the mouse-wheel up and down.
This viewer can be slow on some computers, (long loading times and hard for the videocard) I'm sorry if it is.

Example image below

(http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l380/HPO_2008/TCdrone01.jpg)

Download link: http://www.hpaymans.demon.nl/Dronetest/Ted%20Conners%20drone%2006-25-2007.zip (http://www.hpaymans.demon.nl/Dronetest/Ted%20Conners%20drone%2006-25-2007.zip)

I hope this gives even more life to your description of the craft.

-HPO-

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 03, 2010, 09:20:25 PM
Thanks, "onthefence". My deepest gratitude for giving life to my description of this craft. It is the picture i tried to take and never got. Finally i can show this and say " Here is exactly what i saw" !!!! Thank you for the hours of hard work i know you have spent on this.  Every piece of this puzzle brings me one step closer to resolving this for myself and hopefully helping others who have had this amazing and in some cases frightening experience.

                                                                                                                       Thanks, Ted

Hello Ted,

First of all welcome to this forum Ted, good to have you here.
As a completion to the great photoshop image from onthefence, please find below a download link to a zip file which contains a 3D pdf file of the drone you saw, I've modelled it after the composite image from onthefence.

You need an updated version of acrobat reader to view this file, you can rotate the model when pressing and holding the left mouse button and move the mouse.
To zoom in and out you have to scroll the mouse-wheel up and down.
This viewer can be slow on some computers, (long loading times and hard for the videocard) I'm sorry if it is.

Example image below

(http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l380/HPO_2008/TCdrone01.jpg)

Download link: http://www.hpaymans.demon.nl/Dronetest/Ted%20Conners%20drone%2006-25-2007.zip (http://www.hpaymans.demon.nl/Dronetest/Ted%20Conners%20drone%2006-25-2007.zip)

I hope this gives even more life to your description of the craft.

-HPO-
Thanks HPO. Awesome Job. Really Nice Rendering. Yes it does give life to it!!!
                                                                           
                                                                                  Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: algae on May 03, 2010, 11:06:22 PM
Ted found the French curve image on the Internet and forwarded it to me. He also pointed out the following symbols which he recognized. From all of this I made the composite image which Ted agreed looked like what he saw:

This was NOT the French curve Ted saw?
(http://home.comcast.net/~algae/frenchcurve.jpg)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 03, 2010, 11:19:36 PM
Ted found the French curve image on the Internet and forwarded it to me. He also pointed out the following symbols which he recognized. From all of this I made the composite image which Ted agreed looked like what he saw:

This was NOT the French curve Ted saw?
(http://home.comcast.net/~algae/frenchcurve.jpg)
Due to the darkness of the morning, i could not make out detail such as your image shows, but the basic form reminded me of a "French Curve" as does your image. This could be the the image on the craft i saw. The basic design is for sure. The other symbols were very easy to make out. They were a black semi circle and what looked like a capital "L" laid on it's back.

                                                                                                                      Thanks, Ted

                                                                                                             
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on May 04, 2010, 06:44:57 AM
Hello Ted, nice to read you ! Just a question (maybe you answered yet, but I did'nt see it) :

You seem to fear your Superiors at work, I can understand it ... but,
don't you fear they are tracking you on the web ? With some details you're giving here,
it should'nt be so difficult to find the exact location , I think !
But maybe  I am completely wrong ?
Anyway, thanks for what you are doing : it's  a new life on this forum  !  :D
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 04, 2010, 09:04:58 AM
Hello Ted, nice to read you ! Just a question (maybe you answered yet, but I did'nt see it) :

You seem to fear your Superiors at work, I can understand it ... but,
don't you fear they are tracking you on the web ? With some details you're giving here,
it should'nt be so difficult to find the exact location , I think !
But maybe  I am completely wrong ?
Anyway, thanks for what you are doing : it's  a new life on this forum  !  :D
Hi and thanks for the questions. To answer your questions, No, i certainly don.t fear my superiors. I do respect my superiors and the mission we have. I very much enjoy my career and everyone i work with. I do not think they are tracking me, but if they are, fine, as part of my job involves doing the same and keeping others from doing that to us. Out of respect for my teammates, superiors and the dedication to our mission i will never divulge any information that would put any of that in Jeopardy. I want to see this Drone issue resolved, but not at the expense of my career or the importance of our mission. I am getting very close to retirement and in these hard economic times we all want to insure our ability to earn a living. I also have said that after i retire and it is legally possible i will give as much information as i have if it will help resolve this Drone issue. I do not think my superiors are directly involved in covering up this issue. As to what they know or don't know, i can only speculate. I have reasons to believe that they are as baffled by this event as i am. I hope this answers some of these questions for you and thanks again.                                  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 08, 2010, 12:51:11 AM
Ted (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors#Followup) has defined the movement of the craft with these descriptive statements:

(http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/images/c/c8/TedConnorsBlurCraft.png)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 08, 2010, 01:40:48 AM
Ted (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors#Followup) has defined the movement of the craft with these descriptive statements:
  • A Clear Image linked by a Stretched, Blurred Image to another Clear Image, almost like the transition of the starship Enterprise's transition to WARP speed on the old Star Trek tv show. The first image disappears as soon as the blurred image moves and stops leaving a clear image in a new location, in my sighting about four to five feet distance.
  • The two positions were only 4-5ft apart, the first and second positions overlap.
  • The Stretched, Blurred image was very transparent, almost like a ghost image.

(http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/images/c/c8/TedConnorsBlurCraft.png)
Many thanks. This is exactly what i tried to describe in detail to LMH in my original interview.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 11, 2010, 12:41:56 AM
Ted,
After speaking with you some more on the phone, I think there are some important events in your case that have not yet been exposed. Thank you for giving me permission to bring these items into the public, and I hope that you can expand in your own words on these points:

1. During the time of your sighting, there was a lot of activity at the nearby Maxwell air force base, could you describe as much of that as possible?

2. Sometime after your sighting, you were visited by two men apparently from the military, could you describe what they wanted from you?

3. You were followed at night by a car when you traveled over 100 miles to another state. Can you describe how you knew you were being followed?

4. Your company was using a specific type of IR camera which the manufacturer later informed you had to be removed for a less capable camera. Can you explain any more details on this?

5. Even though no one had your telephone number regarding this drones case, a man called you by telephone about questioning you about the drones. Can you describe anything more about this?


I invite others here to ask Ted questions so that these events are recorded as accurately as possible.

It should also be noted, that Ted had not heard about the drones before contacting Linda in June 2007. Ted knew of Linda from other things that she did in the past.

Thank you!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 11, 2010, 05:28:13 AM
Ted,
After speaking with you some more on the phone, I think there are some important events in your case that have not yet been exposed. Thank you for giving me permission to bring these items into the public, and I hope that you can expand in your own words on these points:

1. During the time of your sighting, there was a lot of activity at the nearby Maxwell air force base, could you describe as much of that as possible?

2. Sometime after your sighting, you were visited by two men apparently from the military, could you describe what they wanted from you?

3. You were followed at night by a car when you traveled over 100 miles to another state. Can you describe how you knew you were being followed?

4. Your company was using a specific type of IR camera which the manufacturer later informed you had to be removed for a less capable camera. Can you explain any more details on this?

5. Even though no one had your telephone number regarding this drones case, a man called you by telephone about questioning you about the drones. Can you describe anything more about this?


I invite others here to ask Ted questions so that these events are recorded as accurately as possible.

It should also be noted, that Ted had not heard about the drones before contacting Linda in June 2007. Ted knew of Linda from other things that she did in the past.

Thank you!
A1. The week before my sighting, it was announced by the local news media that a US Air Force and US Army joint training exercise was to be held the following week beginning on the following Monday at Maxwell AFB. I thought it unusual since i have lived in Montgomery, Al. for 18 years and never remember any tactical exercises being held at Maxwell during that time. Maxwell AFB is the home of the AIR WAR UNIVERSITY and the 908th AIR TRANSPORT WING. The University trains USAF and NATO pilots in the theory and history of air warfare and the 908th air transport wing consists of a small fleet of C130 cargo aircraft for transporting materials around the world for the USAF. Maxwell AFB is certainly not what you would consider a TACTICAL base by any means. In fact it is a very low profile base and the only times i have ever seen any activity out of the ordinary is during the first NYC bombing and then again on Sept.11, 2001 when the base was on lockdown. But the week of my DRONE sighting was certainly different. Starting shortly after dark each evening from Monday through Thursday of that week the air was full of all kinds of aircraft including jet fighters and helicopters. This activity would cease around 2:00am each morning. On the morning of my DRONE sighting the activity had stopped at about 2:00am as well. I have no idea if these TACTICAL EXERCISES had anything to do with what i witnessed that morning but it just all seemed odd that these two events happened on the same week and during nightime. I made a call to MAXWELL AFB and spoke with an Information Officer shortly after my sighting but was told that the information on the exercise was classified and they could not discuss any of the details of the exercise. I have speculated for the past 3 years if this exercise had anything to do with my DRONE sighting but i am no closer to an answer today than i was then.

                                                                                                                        Thanks,  TED
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 11, 2010, 06:05:40 AM
Ted,
After speaking with you some more on the phone, I think there are some important events in your case that have not yet been exposed. Thank you for giving me permission to bring these items into the public, and I hope that you can expand in your own words on these points:

1. During the time of your sighting, there was a lot of activity at the nearby Maxwell air force base, could you describe as much of that as possible?

2. Sometime after your sighting, you were visited by two men apparently from the military, could you describe what they wanted from you?

3. You were followed at night by a car when you traveled over 100 miles to another state. Can you describe how you knew you were being followed?

4. Your company was using a specific type of IR camera which the manufacturer later informed you had to be removed for a less capable camera. Can you explain any more details on this?

5. Even though no one had your telephone number regarding this drones case, a man called you by telephone about questioning you about the drones. Can you describe anything more about this?


I invite others here to ask Ted questions so that these events are recorded as accurately as possible.

It should also be noted, that Ted had not heard about the drones before contacting Linda in June 2007. Ted knew of Linda from other things that she did in the past.

Thank you!
A1. The week before my sighting, it was announced by the local news media that a US Air Force and US Army joint training exercise was to be held the following week beginning on the following Monday at Maxwell AFB. I thought it unusual since i have lived in Montgomery, Al. for 18 years and never remember any tactical exercises being held at Maxwell during that time. Maxwell AFB is the home of the AIR WAR UNIVERSITY and the 908th AIR TRANSPORT WING. The University trains USAF and NATO pilots in the theory and history of air warfare and the 908th air transport wing consists of a small fleet of C130 cargo aircraft for transporting materials around the world for the USAF. Maxwell AFB is certainly not what you would consider a TACTICAL base by any means. In fact it is a very low profile base and the only times i have ever seen any activity out of the ordinary is during the first NYC bombing and then again on Sept.11, 2001 when the base was on lockdown. But the week of my DRONE sighting was certainly different. Starting shortly after dark each evening from Monday through Thursday of that week the air was full of all kinds of aircraft including jet fighters and helicopters. This activity would cease around 2:00am each morning. On the morning of my DRONE sighting the activity had stopped at about 2:00am as well. I have no idea if these TACTICAL EXERCISES had anything to do with what i witnessed that morning but it just all seemed odd that these two events happened on the same week and during nightime. I made a call to MAXWELL AFB and spoke with an Information Officer shortly after my sighting but was told that the information on the exercise was classified and they could not discuss any of the details of the exercise. I have speculated for the past 3 years if this exercise had anything to do with my DRONE sighting but i am no closer to an answer today than i was then.

                                                                                                                        Thanks,  TED
A2. A few weeks after my DRONE sighting i received a visit at my home during the day from 2 men. One of the men introduced himself as Col. -------(*name deleted). The other man never introduced himself to me. The Col. was dressed in a dark business suit and the other man was dressed in a UNUSUAL looking Military style uniform with no rank or branch insignia. The Col. began by asking me if i had seen anything out of the ordinary in the sky during the week in question and i told him i did not wish to discuss anything with him at this time. He then asked if i was aware of any military exercises that had taken place at MAXWELL AFB during the week in question. I told him again that i did not wish to discuss whether i knew it or not. I asked both of them to leave my residence and that i had nothing further to say. At this point i was sure he was going to produce some type of legal document or worse place me under some kind of arrest, but to my complete surprise they politely thanked me for my time and left. I saw them when they arrived and they were driving a late model dark blue or black Ford Crown Victoria. I did not watch them leave as i was concerned that they might try to return and i was trying to decide on my next move, as you can imagine. I never saw these two men again and never received any more visits to my home. The reason for my reluctance to discuss this with them is because of the interview i had recently given to Linda Moulton Howe in regards to my sighting and ongoing discussions with her in regards to this event. I did not feel comfortable discussing this with ANYONE other than her at that point. I contacted her to let her know what happened and the context of my conversation with them.

* The Col.'s name is deleted for obvious reasons.

                                                                                                                  Thanks,  TED
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 11, 2010, 07:07:05 PM
Ted,
After speaking with you some more on the phone, I think there are some important events in your case that have not yet been exposed. Thank you for giving me permission to bring these items into the public, and I hope that you can expand in your own words on these points:

1. During the time of your sighting, there was a lot of activity at the nearby Maxwell air force base, could you describe as much of that as possible?

2. Sometime after your sighting, you were visited by two men apparently from the military, could you describe what they wanted from you?

3. You were followed at night by a car when you traveled over 100 miles to another state. Can you describe how you knew you were being followed?

4. Your company was using a specific type of IR camera which the manufacturer later informed you had to be removed for a less capable camera. Can you explain any more details on this?

5. Even though no one had your telephone number regarding this drones case, a man called you by telephone about questioning you about the drones. Can you describe anything more about this?


I invite others here to ask Ted questions so that these events are recorded as accurately as possible.

It should also be noted, that Ted had not heard about the drones before contacting Linda in June 2007. Ted knew of Linda from other things that she did in the past.

Thank you!
A1. The week before my sighting, it was announced by the local news media that a US Air Force and US Army joint training exercise was to be held the following week beginning on the following Monday at Maxwell AFB. I thought it unusual since i have lived in Montgomery, Al. for 18 years and never remember any tactical exercises being held at Maxwell during that time. Maxwell AFB is the home of the AIR WAR UNIVERSITY and the 908th AIR TRANSPORT WING. The University trains USAF and NATO pilots in the theory and history of air warfare and the 908th air transport wing consists of a small fleet of C130 cargo aircraft for transporting materials around the world for the USAF. Maxwell AFB is certainly not what you would consider a TACTICAL base by any means. In fact it is a very low profile base and the only times i have ever seen any activity out of the ordinary is during the first NYC bombing and then again on Sept.11, 2001 when the base was on lockdown. But the week of my DRONE sighting was certainly different. Starting shortly after dark each evening from Monday through Thursday of that week the air was full of all kinds of aircraft including jet fighters and helicopters. This activity would cease around 2:00am each morning. On the morning of my DRONE sighting the activity had stopped at about 2:00am as well. I have no idea if these TACTICAL EXERCISES had anything to do with what i witnessed that morning but it just all seemed odd that these two events happened on the same week and during nightime. I made a call to MAXWELL AFB and spoke with an Information Officer shortly after my sighting but was told that the information on the exercise was classified and they could not discuss any of the details of the exercise. I have speculated for the past 3 years if this exercise had anything to do with my DRONE sighting but i am no closer to an answer today than i was then.

                                                                                                                        Thanks,  TED
A2. A few weeks after my DRONE sighting i received a visit at my home during the day from 2 men. One of the men introduced himself as Col. -------(*name deleted). The other man never introduced himself to me. The Col. was dressed in a dark business suit and the other man was dressed in a UNUSUAL looking Military style uniform with no rank or branch insignia. The Col. began by asking me if i had seen anything out of the ordinary in the sky during the week in question and i told him i did not wish to discuss anything with him at this time. He then asked if i was aware of any military exercises that had taken place at MAXWELL AFB during the week in question. I told him again that i did not wish to discuss whether i knew it or not. I asked both of them to leave my residence and that i had nothing further to say. At this point i was sure he was going to produce some type of legal document or worse place me under some kind of arrest, but to my complete surprise they politely thanked me for my time and left. I saw them when they arrived and they were driving a late model dark blue or black Ford Crown Victoria. I did not watch them leave as i was concerned that they might try to return and i was trying to decide on my next move, as you can imagine. I never saw these two men again and never received any more visits to my home. The reason for my reluctance to discuss this with them is because of the interview i had recently given to Linda Moulton Howe in regards to my sighting and ongoing discussions with her in regards to this event. I did not feel comfortable discussing this with ANYONE other than her at that point. I contacted her to let her know what happened and the context of my conversation with them.

* The Col.'s name is deleted for obvious reasons.

                                                                                                                  Thanks,  TED
A3. A month or so after my sighting i planned a trip to Atlanta, Ga. to visit a close friend. I left late on a Friday afternoon and as i was driving from my neighborhood to the Interstate Highway i noticed a late model white Ford Taurus parked on the side of the road a block or so from my house.It was occupied by two subjects but i could not tell what they looked like. It is 166 miles from my home in Montgomery to my friends house in Atlanta. The trip takes approx. two and a half hours depending on any stops you make and the traffic situation. As i was passing out of Montgomery headed north on I-85 toward Atlanta i noticed that a car that looked like the one i saw near my home was following 3 cars behind me. It caught my interest due to my training and day to day nature of my work. I continued to keep an eye on this vehicle as i continued my trip to Atlanta. As i reached the halfway point of my trip somewhere near LaGrange, Ga., i decided to exit the interstate for fuel. As i was fueling my vehicle i noticed the same white Taurus drive by the gas station at a slow rate of speed. I decided at that point to try a procedure i had learned in training. I proceeded to get back on the interstate only going South back toward Montgomery instead of North toward Atlanta. My plan was to go to the next exit, about a mile and get off then head back North thereby hoping to pass this vehicle going South as i had been. Maybe i could get a good look at the vehicle and it's occupants across the Median of the interstate. I did not see the Vehicle again until just before i exited the interstate near Atlanta. It remained 3 to 4 cars behind me until i arrived at my friends house at which point it passed by the street i turned on where my friend lived. I did not see this vehicle again either while at my friends home or during my return trip to Montgomery on the next day. My training and experience tells me i was being followed. Maybe so, Maybe not. But strange all the same.                           
                                                                                                                           Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 11, 2010, 07:26:15 PM
Ted,
After speaking with you some more on the phone, I think there are some important events in your case that have not yet been exposed. Thank you for giving me permission to bring these items into the public, and I hope that you can expand in your own words on these points:

1. During the time of your sighting, there was a lot of activity at the nearby Maxwell air force base, could you describe as much of that as possible?

2. Sometime after your sighting, you were visited by two men apparently from the military, could you describe what they wanted from you?

3. You were followed at night by a car when you traveled over 100 miles to another state. Can you describe how you knew you were being followed?

4. Your company was using a specific type of IR camera which the manufacturer later informed you had to be removed for a less capable camera. Can you explain any more details on this?

5. Even though no one had your telephone number regarding this drones case, a man called you by telephone about questioning you about the drones. Can you describe anything more about this?


I invite others here to ask Ted questions so that these events are recorded as accurately as possible.

It should also be noted, that Ted had not heard about the drones before contacting Linda in June 2007. Ted knew of Linda from other things that she did in the past.

Thank you!
A1. The week before my sighting, it was announced by the local news media that a US Air Force and US Army joint training exercise was to be held the following week beginning on the following Monday at Maxwell AFB. I thought it unusual since i have lived in Montgomery, Al. for 18 years and never remember any tactical exercises being held at Maxwell during that time. Maxwell AFB is the home of the AIR WAR UNIVERSITY and the 908th AIR TRANSPORT WING. The University trains USAF and NATO pilots in the theory and history of air warfare and the 908th air transport wing consists of a small fleet of C130 cargo aircraft for transporting materials around the world for the USAF. Maxwell AFB is certainly not what you would consider a TACTICAL base by any means. In fact it is a very low profile base and the only times i have ever seen any activity out of the ordinary is during the first NYC bombing and then again on Sept.11, 2001 when the base was on lockdown. But the week of my DRONE sighting was certainly different. Starting shortly after dark each evening from Monday through Thursday of that week the air was full of all kinds of aircraft including jet fighters and helicopters. This activity would cease around 2:00am each morning. On the morning of my DRONE sighting the activity had stopped at about 2:00am as well. I have no idea if these TACTICAL EXERCISES had anything to do with what i witnessed that morning but it just all seemed odd that these two events happened on the same week and during nightime. I made a call to MAXWELL AFB and spoke with an Information Officer shortly after my sighting but was told that the information on the exercise was classified and they could not discuss any of the details of the exercise. I have speculated for the past 3 years if this exercise had anything to do with my DRONE sighting but i am no closer to an answer today than i was then.

                                                                                                                        Thanks,  TED
A2. A few weeks after my DRONE sighting i received a visit at my home during the day from 2 men. One of the men introduced himself as Col. -------(*name deleted). The other man never introduced himself to me. The Col. was dressed in a dark business suit and the other man was dressed in a UNUSUAL looking Military style uniform with no rank or branch insignia. The Col. began by asking me if i had seen anything out of the ordinary in the sky during the week in question and i told him i did not wish to discuss anything with him at this time. He then asked if i was aware of any military exercises that had taken place at MAXWELL AFB during the week in question. I told him again that i did not wish to discuss whether i knew it or not. I asked both of them to leave my residence and that i had nothing further to say. At this point i was sure he was going to produce some type of legal document or worse place me under some kind of arrest, but to my complete surprise they politely thanked me for my time and left. I saw them when they arrived and they were driving a late model dark blue or black Ford Crown Victoria. I did not watch them leave as i was concerned that they might try to return and i was trying to decide on my next move, as you can imagine. I never saw these two men again and never received any more visits to my home. The reason for my reluctance to discuss this with them is because of the interview i had recently given to Linda Moulton Howe in regards to my sighting and ongoing discussions with her in regards to this event. I did not feel comfortable discussing this with ANYONE other than her at that point. I contacted her to let her know what happened and the context of my conversation with them.

* The Col.'s name is deleted for obvious reasons.

                                                                                                                  Thanks,  TED
A3. A month or so after my sighting i planned a trip to Atlanta, Ga. to visit a close friend. I left late on a Friday afternoon and as i was driving from my neighborhood to the Interstate Highway i noticed a late model white Ford Taurus parked on the side of the road a block or so from my house.It was occupied by two subjects but i could not tell what they looked like. It is 166 miles from my home in Montgomery to my friends house in Atlanta. The trip takes approx. two and a half hours depending on any stops you make and the traffic situation. As i was passing out of Montgomery headed north on I-85 toward Atlanta i noticed that a car that looked like the one i saw near my home was following 3 cars behind me. It caught my interest due to my training and day to day nature of my work. I continued to keep an eye on this vehicle as i continued my trip to Atlanta. As i reached the halfway point of my trip somewhere near LaGrange, Ga., i decided to exit the interstate for fuel. As i was fueling my vehicle i noticed the same white Taurus drive by the gas station at a slow rate of speed. I decided at that point to try a procedure i had learned in training. I proceeded to get back on the interstate only going South back toward Montgomery instead of North toward Atlanta. My plan was to go to the next exit, about a mile and get off then head back North thereby hoping to pass this vehicle going South as i had been. Maybe i could get a good look at the vehicle and it's occupants across the Median of the interstate. I did not see the Vehicle again until just before i exited the interstate near Atlanta. It remained 3 to 4 cars behind me until i arrived at my friends house at which point it passed by the street i turned on where my friend lived. I did not see this vehicle again either while at my friends home or during my return trip to Montgomery on the next day. My training and experience tells me i was being followed. Maybe so, Maybe not. But strange all the same.                           
                                                                                                                           Thanks, Ted
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

                                                                                                       Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 11, 2010, 07:34:03 PM
Ted,
After speaking with you some more on the phone, I think there are some important events in your case that have not yet been exposed. Thank you for giving me permission to bring these items into the public, and I hope that you can expand in your own words on these points:

1. During the time of your sighting, there was a lot of activity at the nearby Maxwell air force base, could you describe as much of that as possible?

2. Sometime after your sighting, you were visited by two men apparently from the military, could you describe what they wanted from you?

3. You were followed at night by a car when you traveled over 100 miles to another state. Can you describe how you knew you were being followed?

4. Your company was using a specific type of IR camera which the manufacturer later informed you had to be removed for a less capable camera. Can you explain any more details on this?

5. Even though no one had your telephone number regarding this drones case, a man called you by telephone about questioning you about the drones. Can you describe anything more about this?


I invite others here to ask Ted questions so that these events are recorded as accurately as possible.

It should also be noted, that Ted had not heard about the drones before contacting Linda in June 2007. Ted knew of Linda from other things that she did in the past.

Thank you!
A1. The week before my sighting, it was announced by the local news media that a US Air Force and US Army joint training exercise was to be held the following week beginning on the following Monday at Maxwell AFB. I thought it unusual since i have lived in Montgomery, Al. for 18 years and never remember any tactical exercises being held at Maxwell during that time. Maxwell AFB is the home of the AIR WAR UNIVERSITY and the 908th AIR TRANSPORT WING. The University trains USAF and NATO pilots in the theory and history of air warfare and the 908th air transport wing consists of a small fleet of C130 cargo aircraft for transporting materials around the world for the USAF. Maxwell AFB is certainly not what you would consider a TACTICAL base by any means. In fact it is a very low profile base and the only times i have ever seen any activity out of the ordinary is during the first NYC bombing and then again on Sept.11, 2001 when the base was on lockdown. But the week of my DRONE sighting was certainly different. Starting shortly after dark each evening from Monday through Thursday of that week the air was full of all kinds of aircraft including jet fighters and helicopters. This activity would cease around 2:00am each morning. On the morning of my DRONE sighting the activity had stopped at about 2:00am as well. I have no idea if these TACTICAL EXERCISES had anything to do with what i witnessed that morning but it just all seemed odd that these two events happened on the same week and during nightime. I made a call to MAXWELL AFB and spoke with an Information Officer shortly after my sighting but was told that the information on the exercise was classified and they could not discuss any of the details of the exercise. I have speculated for the past 3 years if this exercise had anything to do with my DRONE sighting but i am no closer to an answer today than i was then.

                                                                                                                        Thanks,  TED
A2. A few weeks after my DRONE sighting i received a visit at my home during the day from 2 men. One of the men introduced himself as Col. -------(*name deleted). The other man never introduced himself to me. The Col. was dressed in a dark business suit and the other man was dressed in a UNUSUAL looking Military style uniform with no rank or branch insignia. The Col. began by asking me if i had seen anything out of the ordinary in the sky during the week in question and i told him i did not wish to discuss anything with him at this time. He then asked if i was aware of any military exercises that had taken place at MAXWELL AFB during the week in question. I told him again that i did not wish to discuss whether i knew it or not. I asked both of them to leave my residence and that i had nothing further to say. At this point i was sure he was going to produce some type of legal document or worse place me under some kind of arrest, but to my complete surprise they politely thanked me for my time and left. I saw them when they arrived and they were driving a late model dark blue or black Ford Crown Victoria. I did not watch them leave as i was concerned that they might try to return and i was trying to decide on my next move, as you can imagine. I never saw these two men again and never received any more visits to my home. The reason for my reluctance to discuss this with them is because of the interview i had recently given to Linda Moulton Howe in regards to my sighting and ongoing discussions with her in regards to this event. I did not feel comfortable discussing this with ANYONE other than her at that point. I contacted her to let her know what happened and the context of my conversation with them.

* The Col.'s name is deleted for obvious reasons.

                                                                                                                  Thanks,  TED
A3. A month or so after my sighting i planned a trip to Atlanta, Ga. to visit a close friend. I left late on a Friday afternoon and as i was driving from my neighborhood to the Interstate Highway i noticed a late model white Ford Taurus parked on the side of the road a block or so from my house.It was occupied by two subjects but i could not tell what they looked like. It is 166 miles from my home in Montgomery to my friends house in Atlanta. The trip takes approx. two and a half hours depending on any stops you make and the traffic situation. As i was passing out of Montgomery headed north on I-85 toward Atlanta i noticed that a car that looked like the one i saw near my home was following 3 cars behind me. It caught my interest due to my training and day to day nature of my work. I continued to keep an eye on this vehicle as i continued my trip to Atlanta. As i reached the halfway point of my trip somewhere near LaGrange, Ga., i decided to exit the interstate for fuel. As i was fueling my vehicle i noticed the same white Taurus drive by the gas station at a slow rate of speed. I decided at that point to try a procedure i had learned in training. I proceeded to get back on the interstate only going South back toward Montgomery instead of North toward Atlanta. My plan was to go to the next exit, about a mile and get off then head back North thereby hoping to pass this vehicle going South as i had been. Maybe i could get a good look at the vehicle and it's occupants across the Median of the interstate. I did not see the Vehicle again until just before i exited the interstate near Atlanta. It remained 3 to 4 cars behind me until i arrived at my friends house at which point it passed by the street i turned on where my friend lived. I did not see this vehicle again either while at my friends home or during my return trip to Montgomery on the next day. My training and experience tells me i was being followed. Maybe so, Maybe not. But strange all the same.                           
                                                                                                                           Thanks, Ted
A5 This call was completely strange. The caller never identified themselves and it made no sense at all. The caller asked if i was the person that had seen a Drone near Maxwell AFB and wanted to know what else i had witnessed. I asked who was calling and there were a few moments of silence and the voice on the other end of the line said "Nevermind" and just hung up. Still a mystery to me!!

                                                                                                                Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 12, 2010, 02:04:55 AM
Ted, thank you very much for detailing those events in your own words!



With Ted's (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors) help in many email messages and phone calls, we have come to an agreement on what his visitors looked like. Ted carefully guided me through the following criteria:
 1. Clothing color and style for both men.
 2. Age and build of each man.
 3. Make, model, color of their vehicle.

(http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/images/thumb/1/13/TedConnorsMibs.jpg/751px-TedConnorsMibs.jpg)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 14, 2010, 02:56:15 PM
Thanks to Ted's patience in explaining some details that I was curious about, I have made a small animation to depict his encounter.

I specifically concentrated on these points:

Ted Connors, AL, Drone sighting reconstruction. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUYWsmTaF_U#)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on May 15, 2010, 08:10:40 PM
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

                                                                                                       Thanks,  Ted

What is the difference between "level 4" and "level 3" IR cams?  Power level or other technological differences?  Do these cameras emit anything?  I know that IR cams can be enhance with IR emitters.  If there are no emissions of any kind then how can it have an effect on a drone?  In other words, if the surveillance equipment is for all intents an purposes totally passive as far as the drone is concerned, how can it have an effect on it so that it becomes visible to the naked eye?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on May 15, 2010, 08:16:12 PM
A5 This call was completely strange. The caller never identified themselves and it made no sense at all. The caller asked if i was the person that had seen a Drone near Maxwell AFB and wanted to know what else i had witnessed. I asked who was calling and there were a few moments of silence and the voice on the other end of the line said "Nevermind" and just hung up. Still a mystery to me!!

                                                                                                                Thanks, Ted

They specifically used the word "Drone"?   Please forgive me if you already answered these questions but was this called to your home phone land line?  Did you happen to get a caller ID?  About what time of the day and about how many days after your interview with Linda?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 16, 2010, 12:39:18 AM
A5 This call was completely strange. The caller never identified themselves and it made no sense at all. The caller asked if i was the person that had seen a Drone near Maxwell AFB and wanted to know what else i had witnessed. I asked who was calling and there were a few moments of silence and the voice on the other end of the line said "Nevermind" and just hung up. Still a mystery to me!!

                                                                                                                Thanks, Ted

They specifically used the word "Drone"?   Please forgive me if you already answered these questions but was this called to your home phone land line?  Did you happen to get a caller ID?  About what time of the day and about how many days after your interview with Linda?
Yes, they used the word DRONE. The call was made to the cell phone i had at the time. I checked the "call Records' of the phone as soon as the caller hung up and it recorded the call as "UNKNOWN". I also attempted to use the "CALL BACK" feature on my phone but since it was listed as "UNKNOWN", it would not redial the call. I also contacted my cell phone provider at the time, a local company in my area, Cellular One. They could not provide any information on the call, but told me if i recieve any more calls of a disturbing nature to let them know and they would investigate further.     
                                                                                                                   Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 16, 2010, 01:02:21 AM
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

                                                                                                       Thanks,  Ted

What is the difference between "level 4" and "level 3" IR cams?  Power level or other technological differences?  Do these cameras emit anything?  I know that IR cams can be enhance with IR emitters.  If there are no emissions of any kind then how can it have an effect on a drone?  In other words, if the surveillance equipment is for all intents an purposes totally passive as far as the drone is concerned, how can it have an effect on it so that it becomes visible to the naked eye?
From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides. Level 4 IR provided a much sharper image using lower level IR lamp emmiters and has enhanced optics at a much further distance than Level 3. If you are familiar with most comercial IR cameras the image tends to become less detailed at long distances even if it has a zoom option. this is due mostly to the IR lamps illumination and the frequency of the IR emmiters used. The technology used in Level 4 enhances the light spectrum as well as having a much higher level of clarity from the lens of the camera itself. The difference for me was very noticeable. Images could be recorded at a much longer range with a much clearer image than the Level 3 cameras could possibly provide. Again, my training was mostly limited to the usage of this equipment rather than the overall knowledge of the Level 4 technology. I did ask a lot of questions of the person sent to provide our team training and the information i am giving is based on a combination of the training i received and the questions i asked.
                                                                                                          Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 16, 2010, 02:19:48 AM
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

                                                                                                       Thanks,  Ted

What is the difference between "level 4" and "level 3" IR cams?  Power level or other technological differences?  Do these cameras emit anything?  I know that IR cams can be enhance with IR emitters.  If there are no emissions of any kind then how can it have an effect on a drone?  In other words, if the surveillance equipment is for all intents an purposes totally passive as far as the drone is concerned, how can it have an effect on it so that it becomes visible to the naked eye?
From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides. Level 4 IR provided a much sharper image using lower level IR lamp emmiters and has enhanced optics at a much further distance than Level 3. If you are familiar with most comercial IR cameras the image tends to become less detailed at long distances even if it has a zoom option. this is due mostly to the IR lamps illumination and the frequency of the IR emmiters used. The technology used in Level 4 enhances the light spectrum as well as having a much higher level of clarity from the lens of the camera itself. The difference for me was very noticeable. Images could be recorded at a much longer range with a much clearer image than the Level 3 cameras could possibly provide. Again, my training was mostly limited to the usage of this equipment rather than the overall knowledge of the Level 4 technology. I did ask a lot of questions of the person sent to provide our team training and the information i am giving is based on a combination of the training i received and the questions i asked.
                                                                                                          Thanks, Ted
In answer to your question of how a passive device such as an IR camera could detect this craft, i am not sure this equipment did. It is only a theory i have based on the fact that all this equipment was in use at the time of my sighting. I have no definite proof that this is the case. Based on what i have read of other sightings it does not seem to come into play in most instances. But in my view if some device emits an energy and uses that energy to detect an image or sound, is it really a passive device? And given the technology and ability of this Level 4 IR equipment it seems possible that it could have had an effect on my ability to see this craft if it indeed was using some form of invisibility or cloaking technology.
                                                                                                                     Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 16, 2010, 02:59:52 AM
A5 This call was completely strange. The caller never identified themselves and it made no sense at all. The caller asked if i was the person that had seen a Drone near Maxwell AFB and wanted to know what else i had witnessed. I asked who was calling and there were a few moments of silence and the voice on the other end of the line said "Nevermind" and just hung up. Still a mystery to me!!

                                                                                                                Thanks, Ted

They specifically used the word "Drone"?   Please forgive me if you already answered these questions but was this called to your home phone land line?  Did you happen to get a caller ID?  About what time of the day and about how many days after your interview with Linda?
Yes, they used the word DRONE. The call was made to the cell phone i had at the time. I checked the "call Records' of the phone as soon as the caller hung up and it recorded the call as "UNKNOWN". I also attempted to use the "CALL BACK" feature on my phone but since it was listed as "UNKNOWN", it would not redial the call. I also contacted my cell phone provider at the time, a local company in my area, Cellular One. They could not provide any information on the call, but told me if i recieve any more calls of a disturbing nature to let them know and they would investigate further.     
                                                                                                                   Thanks, Ted
I received this call about a week after my visit from the 2 individuals from Maxwell AFB. I don't remember the exact day, but i think it was during the week and not the weekend.

                                                                                                                     Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 16, 2010, 03:08:34 AM
A5 This call was completely strange. The caller never identified themselves and it made no sense at all. The caller asked if i was the person that had seen a Drone near Maxwell AFB and wanted to know what else i had witnessed. I asked who was calling and there were a few moments of silence and the voice on the other end of the line said "Nevermind" and just hung up. Still a mystery to me!!

                                                                                                                Thanks, Ted

They specifically used the word "Drone"?   Please forgive me if you already answered these questions but was this called to your home phone land line?  Did you happen to get a caller ID?  About what time of the day and about how many days after your interview with Linda?
Yes, they used the word DRONE. The call was made to the cell phone i had at the time. I checked the "call Records' of the phone as soon as the caller hung up and it recorded the call as "UNKNOWN". I also attempted to use the "CALL BACK" feature on my phone but since it was listed as "UNKNOWN", it would not redial the call. I also contacted my cell phone provider at the time, a local company in my area, Cellular One. They could not provide any information on the call, but told me if i recieve any more calls of a disturbing nature to let them know and they would investigate further.     
                                                                                                                   Thanks, Ted
I received this call about a week after my visit from the 2 individuals from Maxwell AFB. I don't remember the exact day, but i think it was during the week and not the weekend.

                                                                                                                     Thanks, Ted
As i recall it was about 6  weeks after my interview with LMH. As to the time of day, it was early afternoon somewhere around 2pm.
                                                                                                                      Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: boatswain on May 17, 2010, 05:11:28 PM
Quote
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides. Level 4 IR provided a much sharper image using lower level IR lamp emmiters and has enhanced optics at a much further distance than Level 3. If you are familiar with most comercial IR cameras the image tends to become less detailed at long distances even if it has a zoom option. this is due mostly to the IR lamps illumination and the frequency of the IR emmiters used. The technology used in Level 4 enhances the light spectrum as well as having a much higher level of clarity from the lens of the camera itself. The difference for me was very noticeable. Images could be recorded at a much longer range with a much clearer image than the Level 3 cameras could possibly provide. Again, my training was mostly limited to the usage of this equipment rather than the overall knowledge of the Level 4 technology. I did ask a lot of questions of the person sent to provide our team training and the information i am giving is based on a combination of the training i received and the questions i asked.

Ted, I have a number of questions on the surveillance system you describe, especially the 'very expensive infrared cameras' that you state you were using in 2007, that were 'available to both military and civilian markets'.

You mention using 'expensive infrared cameras', with 'emitters and lamps'. However, typical "infrared cameras" are used in consumer and business applications because IR emitter range is limited (typically long range units are good for a max of 100 ft), and of course they are easily detected by anyone with a camera phone. Such infrared cameras are not very expensive and even a name brand IR camera with a Sony CCD is under a thousand dollars, with IR emitters running a few hundred dollars.

High grade commercial and military security of the type you imply you are working at almost exclusively uses thermal cameras (e.g. FLIR, Xenics, Cantronics, EMX) which are not generally called "infrared' and do not use emitters. Thermal cameras are also typically thousands of dollars and can range up to five figures.  (Reference: "Using Thermal Cameras to Secure the Homeland" http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=40915 (http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=40915))

Q1. Are you stating that your facility uses infrared cameras and emitters, or true thermal cameras without emitters? If the object you saw was 30-40 yards away, it would have been out of the range of most IR camera/emitter systems. The description sounds like thermal but your terminology is inconsistent. You already stated that you were unwilling to name the manufacturer, but can you provide a clearer description?

Quote
From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides.

Q2.  I have worked around the high tech security business for 20 years and have never heard of these "Level 3" and "Level 4" terms used to describe cameras. I cannot locate any such term usage on Google either. Where did these terms "Level 3" and "Level 4" originate?

Quote
In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC.

Q3. You mention a DOD and FCC directive from late 2007 restricting civilian use of 'Level 4' infrared cameras. Can you please provide further information about this directive? Also, what department of the FCC regulates cameras? I can find no information about their involvement in this industry at all, and I've certainly never heard of it. I searched the entire FCC site and found zero relevant references, so I'm skeptical such a memo exists, since the FCC does not regulate such devices in the way you describe. The DOD also has no authority in this area. It's actually the Department of Commerce Export Administration Regulations that sets technology restrictions, and I've never seen a case where they restrict domestic use of cameras in the way you describe. Are you claiming this is some sort of classified government operation that is undocumented?

Quote
Also, i have been asked if we got any images on our Digital Video Recorder?? the answer is no because all the cameras are set at a maximum level of the horizon and would not elevate any further. This is to keep from accidently burning out these very expensive cameras by pointing them directly at the sun.

Modern thermal cameras made in the last decade are not susceptible to sun damage in the way you describe. Most thermal cameras are dual "day/night use" and are widely used by military and law enforcement where direct exposure to the sun is very common (e.g. the traditional helicopter chase filmed from the air). Most vendors advertise that their thermal cameras can look directly into the sun in order to see movement in shadows, which is one of the key benefits of thermal surveillance (e.g. see http://www.flir.com/uploadedfiles/Eurasia/MMC/Tech_Notes/TN_0006_EN.pdf (http://www.flir.com/uploadedfiles/Eurasia/MMC/Tech_Notes/TN_0006_EN.pdf)) . You claim that this was not possible with your cameras which seems to defeat much of the purpose of having a thermal camera in the first place.

Q4. Can you clarify why you think your cameras are susceptible to sun damage?

Thanks,

Boatswain

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 17, 2010, 06:36:05 PM
Quote
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides. Level 4 IR provided a much sharper image using lower level IR lamp emmiters and has enhanced optics at a much further distance than Level 3. If you are familiar with most comercial IR cameras the image tends to become less detailed at long distances even if it has a zoom option. this is due mostly to the IR lamps illumination and the frequency of the IR emmiters used. The technology used in Level 4 enhances the light spectrum as well as having a much higher level of clarity from the lens of the camera itself. The difference for me was very noticeable. Images could be recorded at a much longer range with a much clearer image than the Level 3 cameras could possibly provide. Again, my training was mostly limited to the usage of this equipment rather than the overall knowledge of the Level 4 technology. I did ask a lot of questions of the person sent to provide our team training and the information i am giving is based on a combination of the training i received and the questions i asked.

Ted, I have a number of questions on the surveillance system you describe, especially the 'very expensive infrared cameras' that you state you were using in 2007, that were 'available to both military and civilian markets'.

You mention using 'expensive infrared cameras', with 'emitters and lamps'. However, typical "infrared cameras" are used in consumer and business applications because IR emitter range is limited (typically long range units are good for a max of 100 ft), and of course they are easily detected by anyone with a camera phone. Such infrared cameras are not very expensive and even a name brand IR camera with a Sony CCD is under a thousand dollars, with IR emitters running a few hundred dollars.

High grade commercial and military security of the type you imply you are working at almost exclusively uses thermal cameras (e.g. FLIR, Xenics, Cantronics, EMX) which are not generally called "infrared' and do not use emitters. Thermal cameras are also typically thousands of dollars and can range up to five figures.  (Reference: "Using Thermal Cameras to Secure the Homeland" http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=40915 (http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=40915))

Q1. Are you stating that your facility uses infrared cameras and emitters, or true thermal cameras without emitters? If the object you saw was 30-40 yards away, it would have been out of the range of most IR camera/emitter systems. The description sounds like thermal but your terminology is inconsistent. You already stated that you were unwilling to name the manufacturer, but can you provide a clearer description?

Quote
From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides.

Q2.  I have worked around the high tech security business for 20 years and have never heard of these "Level 3" and "Level 4" terms used to describe cameras. I cannot locate any such term usage on Google either. Where did these terms "Level 3" and "Level 4" originate?

Quote
In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC.

Q3. You mention a DOD and FCC directive from late 2007 restricting civilian use of 'Level 4' infrared cameras. Can you please provide further information about this directive? Also, what department of the FCC regulates cameras? I can find no information about their involvement in this industry at all, and I've certainly never heard of it. I searched the entire FCC site and found zero relevant references, so I'm skeptical such a memo exists, since the FCC does not regulate such devices in the way you describe. The DOD also has no authority in this area. It's actually the Department of Commerce Export Administration Regulations that sets technology restrictions, and I've never seen a case where they restrict domestic use of cameras in the way you describe. Are you claiming this is some sort of classified government operation that is undocumented?

Quote
Also, i have been asked if we got any images on our Digital Video Recorder?? the answer is no because all the cameras are set at a maximum level of the horizon and would not elevate any further. This is to keep from accidently burning out these very expensive cameras by pointing them directly at the sun.

Modern thermal cameras made in the last decade are not susceptible to sun damage in the way you describe. Most thermal cameras are dual "day/night use" and are widely used by military and law enforcement where direct exposure to the sun is very common (e.g. the traditional helicopter chase filmed from the air). Most vendors advertise that their thermal cameras can look directly into the sun in order to see movement in shadows, which is one of the key benefits of thermal surveillance (e.g. see http://www.flir.com/uploadedfiles/Eurasia/MMC/Tech_Notes/TN_0006_EN.pdf (http://www.flir.com/uploadedfiles/Eurasia/MMC/Tech_Notes/TN_0006_EN.pdf)) . You claim that this was not possible with your cameras which seems to defeat much of the purpose of having a thermal camera in the first place.

Q4. Can you clarify why you think your cameras are susceptible to sun damage?

Thanks,

Boatswain
Thanks for the questions. I will try to clarify and explain each of them.

A1. Both infra red and thermal cameras are in use at my workplace. The area of my sighting however was only covered by infra red cameras at that time. Some of the cameras have IR emitters and lamps, others do not.I cannot elaborate on the nomenclature of these devices without risking a breech of security and privacy agreement.  As of 2009 it is now covered by both Thermal and IR equipment as well as other Audio,Video, and Motion sensing devices which i am unable to discuss due to security restrictions.

A2. The term "LEVEL" was used by the manufacturer of the equipment we were being trained on and was also referenced in the documents we received at work in regards to the purchase of this equipment. In regards to the difference between Level 3 and Level 4, I only know what i have been told and related here previously on the forum. Also, we received documents from Dept.of Homeland Security, The Department of Defense, and The Federal Communications Commission using the term "LEVEL" in describing these types of IR cameras. These i read and signed off on as i am required to do by my duty requirements.

A3. I am not at liberty to discuss the overall purpose of my mission or my work, but as i stated in A2., the documents i received were from the agencies i have listed. After i had read these documents at work i took it upon myself to investigate further on my own and at the time, found nothing on the Internet other than some vague undocumented statements about a "BAN" on Level 4 IR cameras posted. At the time i contacted Linda Moulton Howe and she also undertook an investigation of her own with similar results.

A4. We,(our team) were told by our superiors that the infra red cameras, ( not the thermal cameras and equipment) were set at horizon level to prevent any damage to the lens, iris, and electronics of these devices by eliminating the chance of them being pointed directly at the sun at any particular level as well as not being pointed at the direct Eastern or Western horizon. The area where these cameras are located are in depressed regions so that the have the best overall field of view without the danger of excessive sunlight.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 17, 2010, 06:37:49 PM
Quote
A4. The camera equipment we were using in 2007 was state of the art Level 4 Infra Red Video Cameras. This was brand new technology at the time and was available to both the Military and Civilian market. In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC. This equipment would only be available to the Military and U.S. Government agencies. In November 2007 i was informed by my superiors at work that we would be changing all our equipment back to Level 3 IR. This change took place in late November 2007. It has remained the same since. Did the Level 4 equipment allow for my DRONE sighting?? I have a suspicion but no proof that it did. I tried to get more information from my supplier on this issue but with no success. I also reported this to LMH by email and she responded with her thoughts as well.

From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides. Level 4 IR provided a much sharper image using lower level IR lamp emmiters and has enhanced optics at a much further distance than Level 3. If you are familiar with most comercial IR cameras the image tends to become less detailed at long distances even if it has a zoom option. this is due mostly to the IR lamps illumination and the frequency of the IR emmiters used. The technology used in Level 4 enhances the light spectrum as well as having a much higher level of clarity from the lens of the camera itself. The difference for me was very noticeable. Images could be recorded at a much longer range with a much clearer image than the Level 3 cameras could possibly provide. Again, my training was mostly limited to the usage of this equipment rather than the overall knowledge of the Level 4 technology. I did ask a lot of questions of the person sent to provide our team training and the information i am giving is based on a combination of the training i received and the questions i asked.

Ted, I have a number of questions on the surveillance system you describe, especially the 'very expensive infrared cameras' that you state you were using in 2007, that were 'available to both military and civilian markets'.

You mention using 'expensive infrared cameras', with 'emitters and lamps'. However, typical "infrared cameras" are used in consumer and business applications because IR emitter range is limited (typically long range units are good for a max of 100 ft), and of course they are easily detected by anyone with a camera phone. Such infrared cameras are not very expensive and even a name brand IR camera with a Sony CCD is under a thousand dollars, with IR emitters running a few hundred dollars.

High grade commercial and military security of the type you imply you are working at almost exclusively uses thermal cameras (e.g. FLIR, Xenics, Cantronics, EMX) which are not generally called "infrared' and do not use emitters. Thermal cameras are also typically thousands of dollars and can range up to five figures.  (Reference: "Using Thermal Cameras to Secure the Homeland" http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=40915 (http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=40915))

Q1. Are you stating that your facility uses infrared cameras and emitters, or true thermal cameras without emitters? If the object you saw was 30-40 yards away, it would have been out of the range of most IR camera/emitter systems. The description sounds like thermal but your terminology is inconsistent. You already stated that you were unwilling to name the manufacturer, but can you provide a clearer description?

Quote
From the training i received, the big difference between Level 3 and Level 4 as i understood it was the clarity and detail of the images it provides.

Q2.  I have worked around the high tech security business for 20 years and have never heard of these "Level 3" and "Level 4" terms used to describe cameras. I cannot locate any such term usage on Google either. Where did these terms "Level 3" and "Level 4" originate?

Quote
In October of 2007 i received a memo at work from our supplier of this equipment that as of Jan.1st 2008 we would no longer be able to purchase Level 4 IR equipment for civilian use as ordered by the United States Government per the attached directive from the DOD and FCC.

Q3. You mention a DOD and FCC directive from late 2007 restricting civilian use of 'Level 4' infrared cameras. Can you please provide further information about this directive? Also, what department of the FCC regulates cameras? I can find no information about their involvement in this industry at all, and I've certainly never heard of it. I searched the entire FCC site and found zero relevant references, so I'm skeptical such a memo exists, since the FCC does not regulate such devices in the way you describe. The DOD also has no authority in this area. It's actually the Department of Commerce Export Administration Regulations that sets technology restrictions, and I've never seen a case where they restrict domestic use of cameras in the way you describe. Are you claiming this is some sort of classified government operation that is undocumented?

Quote
Also, i have been asked if we got any images on our Digital Video Recorder?? the answer is no because all the cameras are set at a maximum level of the horizon and would not elevate any further. This is to keep from accidently burning out these very expensive cameras by pointing them directly at the sun.

Modern thermal cameras made in the last decade are not susceptible to sun damage in the way you describe. Most thermal cameras are dual "day/night use" and are widely used by military and law enforcement where direct exposure to the sun is very common (e.g. the traditional helicopter chase filmed from the air). Most vendors advertise that their thermal cameras can look directly into the sun in order to see movement in shadows, which is one of the key benefits of thermal surveillance (e.g. see http://www.flir.com/uploadedfiles/Eurasia/MMC/Tech_Notes/TN_0006_EN.pdf (http://www.flir.com/uploadedfiles/Eurasia/MMC/Tech_Notes/TN_0006_EN.pdf)) . You claim that this was not possible with your cameras which seems to defeat much of the purpose of having a thermal camera in the first place.

Q4. Can you clarify why you think your cameras are susceptible to sun damage?

Thanks,

Boatswain
Thanks for the questions. I will try to clarify and explain each of them.

A1. Both infra red and thermal cameras are in use at my workplace. The area of my sighting however was only covered by infra red cameras at that time. Some of the cameras have IR emitters and lamps, others do not.I cannot elaborate on the nomenclature of these devices without risking a breech of security and privacy agreement.  As of 2009 it is now covered by both Thermal and IR equipment as well as other Audio,Video, and Motion sensing devices which i am unable to discuss due to security restrictions.

A2. The term "LEVEL" was used by the manufacturer of the equipment we were being trained on and was also referenced in the documents we received at work in regards to the purchase of this equipment. In regards to the difference between Level 3 and Level 4, I only know what i have been told and related here previously on the forum. Also, we received documents from Dept.of Homeland Security, The Department of Defense, and The Federal Communications Commission using the term "LEVEL" in describing these types of IR cameras. These i read and signed off on as i am required to do by my duty requirements.

A3. I am not at liberty to discuss the overall purpose of my mission or my work, but as i stated in A2., the documents i received were from the agencies i have listed. After i had read these documents at work i took it upon myself to investigate further on my own and at the time, found nothing on the Internet other than some vague undocumented statements about a "BAN" on Level 4 IR cameras posted. At the time i contacted Linda Moulton Howe and she also undertook an investigation of her own with similar results.

A4. We,(our team) were told by our superiors that the infra red cameras, ( not the thermal cameras and equipment) were set at horizon level to prevent any damage to the lens, iris, and electronics of these devices by eliminating the chance of them being pointed directly at the sun at any particular level as well as not being pointed at the direct Eastern or Western horizon. The area where these cameras are located are in depressed regions so that the have the best overall field of view without the danger of excessive sunlight.
Thanks again for the questions,                                             Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 17, 2010, 08:34:46 PM
In regards to the Level 3 and Level 4 nomenclature; I recall looking  that up in 2008 and it seemed to be a distinction used to sell IR cameras at some web sites. I cannot find that any longer.


In regards to the camera ban, while not a reliable source, here is some anecdotal evidence regarding that subject from GLP (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message521216/pg1):
Quote from: GLP
  I'll Explain this for you real quick, seeing as how I just purchased one.
  THese cameras are for sale, but you need to prove who you are and why you
  need one. Only art photographers, forensic experts, law enforcement,
  military, etc can purchase these with verification of ID. The reason is
  that these cameras can sometimes see through certain types of clothing
  and that is something that could be bad news in the hands of
  pedophiles/paparazzi. I had to fill out an application to buy and it was
  quickly approved and shipped out to me.

  Sgt D.
  USMC

Here is another story on the IR camera ban from OMF (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=gotopost&board=general&thread=407&post=3637):
Quote from: AP
2 arrested at LAX over Chinese camera shipment
The Associated Press
Article Launched: 04/05/2008 10:10:19 AM PDT

LOS ANGELESâ??Two men were arrested Saturday after they tried to board a
plane to China with sensitive infrared cameras in their luggage, a
federal official said.

Yong Guo Zhi, a Chinese national, and Tah Wei Chao, a naturalized U.S.
citizen, were stopped by federal agents on the jetway as they were
preparing to board the flight to Beijing, said Rick Weir, assistant
special agent in charge of the Los Angeles office of the Department of
Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security.

The men, who had been in the United States for about a week, were
arrested for investigation of trying to take thermal imaging cameras with
potential military use to China without the proper export licenses, Weir
said.

Julie Salcido, a supervising agent with the Bureau of Industry and
Security, said one of the men purchased the cameras, assuring the seller
repeatedly that they were only for domestic use.

"He repeatedly said he wouldn't export," she said.

Ten of the cameras, which measure about 2 inches square and cost about
$5,000 each, were found in the men's checked luggage, Weir said. Salcido
said it appeared they split the shipment up between them.

The cameras have both commercial and military uses but they are "very
expensive, highly sensitive," Weir said. "They're not something you could
buy off the shelf."

The men were taken to the downtown Metropolitan Detention Center and
could not immediately be reached for comment.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 17, 2010, 08:52:22 PM
I'm still looking into Level 3 and 4 terminology, and so far found this description (http://www.opgal.com/infrared.php?actions=show&id=6) discussing "Generation" differences:

Quote from: OPGAL
Detector size
Four distinct generations of thermal imagers have been designed, based on IR detector technologies developed during the last 30 years, and classified according to the number of elements contained in each group.
  • 1st generation thermal imagers contain single element detectors, or detectors with only a few elements. A two-dimensional mechanical scanner was usually used in order to generate a two-dimensional image.
  • 2nd generation thermal imagers are vector detectors, usually containing 64 or more elements. The two-dimensional scanner was somehow simplified in the vertical direction, to include only the interlace motion.
  • 3rd generation thermal imagers contain two-dimensional arrays with several columns of elements. These thermal imagers still scan in one direction and perform a Time Delay Integration (TDI) of the signal in the scanning direction in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
  • 4th generation thermal imagers contain two-dimensional array detectors that do not require any scanning mechanism for acquiring the two-dimensional picture.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: boatswain on May 17, 2010, 09:10:29 PM
A3. I am not at liberty to discuss the overall purpose of my mission or my work, but as i stated in A2., the documents i received were from the agencies i have listed. After i had read these documents at work i took it upon myself to investigate further on my own and at the time, found nothing on the Internet other than some vague undocumented statements about a "BAN" on Level 4 IR cameras posted. At the time i contacted Linda Moulton Howe and she also undertook an investigation of her own with similar results.

So you saw official FCC and DoD documents discussing a ban on these "Level 4" cameras, but no such FCC document has ever surfaced?

I'm really struggling to see how the FCC could possibly be involved with this. Can you provide a copy of such a document? Can you provide any reference to it that can be checked by a third party?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 17, 2010, 09:23:21 PM
A3. I am not at liberty to discuss the overall purpose of my mission or my work, but as i stated in A2., the documents i received were from the agencies i have listed. After i had read these documents at work i took it upon myself to investigate further on my own and at the time, found nothing on the Internet other than some vague undocumented statements about a "BAN" on Level 4 IR cameras posted. At the time i contacted Linda Moulton Howe and she also undertook an investigation of her own with similar results.

So you saw official FCC and DoD documents discussing a ban on these "Level 4" cameras, but no such FCC document has ever surfaced?

I'm really struggling to see how the FCC could possibly be involved with this. Can you provide a copy of such a document? Can you provide any reference to it that can be checked by a third party?
The only documentation i ever had was a memo that i received at work from the equipment manufacturer stating that after January 1st, 2008 that Level 4 equipment would no longer be available for purchase by the Civilian Sector or the General Public due to new government regulations. I contacted my representative at the manufacturer to find out more. He directed me to review the DOD memo that i had previously signed and forwarded to my superiors. For reasons i can't go into here, i may still be able to obtain that manufacturers memo. I am continuing to work on that process.

                                                                                                                   Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 17, 2010, 09:43:31 PM
More about restrictions, from Moro Vision Night Vision (http://www.morovision.com/faqs.htm):
Quote from: MORO-VISION
Export of GEN-3 night vision equipment from the United States without a valid export permit issued by the U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls is strictly prohibited and is a federal crime.

More about various "levels", I am pretty sure now that it must the the term "Generation". Also from Moro Vision Night Vision (http://www.morovision.com/terminology.htm#generations):
Quote from: MORO-VISION
Myth vs. Fact: Generation 4
Some say that generation (Gen) 4 is the most advanced night vision you can buy. This is not the case. To dispel this myth, let's start with the basics. There are four Generations of night vision; however, they are Gen 0-3, not Gen 1-4. Historically, the U.S. Army has defined each Generation of night vision. In the late 90's the Army did define Gen 4 as the removal of the ion barrier film creating a "filmless" tube. This new advancement was to reduce halos while increasing sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution, for overall improved performance. While performance was improved, the lack of an ion barrier in Gen 4 tubes led to high failure rates, ultimately leading the U.S. Army to recant the existence of Gen 4 definition. Recognizing the high failure rates of Gen 4 tubes, ITT chose to improve upon the existing Gen 3 technology and create a "thin-filmed" tube. By keeping the protective ion barrier, but greatly reducing its thickness, ITT was able to maintain the reliability of Gen 3 while�at the same time�delivering on the Army's performance requirements intended for Gen 4. This innovation resulted in the production of the Gen 3 thin-filmed tube, which is now the highest performing Gen 3 tube available.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 17, 2010, 09:45:07 PM
A3. I am not at liberty to discuss the overall purpose of my mission or my work, but as i stated in A2., the documents i received were from the agencies i have listed. After i had read these documents at work i took it upon myself to investigate further on my own and at the time, found nothing on the Internet other than some vague undocumented statements about a "BAN" on Level 4 IR cameras posted. At the time i contacted Linda Moulton Howe and she also undertook an investigation of her own with similar results.

So you saw official FCC and DoD documents discussing a ban on these "Level 4" cameras, but no such FCC document has ever surfaced?

I'm really struggling to see how the FCC could possibly be involved with this. Can you provide a copy of such a document? Can you provide any reference to it that can be checked by a third party?
In regards to the official government documents, not only did i see and read these, i also affixed my signature to them. I feel i have a right to know just as we all want to know whats going on. It has been 3 years and i put all this behind me because i was not aware of a forum such as this. Now i am trying to start from scratch again and document everything that took place. Many of the items i have discussed i documented after my sighting and some are from memory. Also any documents are still the property of my employer even the ones with my signature.

                                                                                                                      Thanks, Ted

                                                                                                                 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 17, 2010, 09:57:17 PM
More about restrictions, from Moro Vision Night Vision (http://www.morovision.com/faqs.htm):
Quote from: MORO-VISION
Export of GEN-3 night vision equipment from the United States without a valid export permit issued by the U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls is strictly prohibited and is a federal crime.

More about various "levels", I am pretty sure now that it must the the term "Generation". Also from Moro Vision Night Vision (http://www.morovision.com/terminology.htm#generations):
Quote from: MORO-VISION
Myth vs. Fact: Generation 4
Some say that generation (Gen) 4 is the most advanced night vision you can buy. This is not the case. To dispel this myth, let's start with the basics. There are four Generations of night vision; however, they are Gen 0-3, not Gen 1-4. Historically, the U.S. Army has defined each Generation of night vision. In the late 90's the Army did define Gen 4 as the removal of the ion barrier film creating a "filmless" tube. This new advancement was to reduce halos while increasing sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution, for overall improved performance. While performance was improved, the lack of an ion barrier in Gen 4 tubes led to high failure rates, ultimately leading the U.S. Army to recant the existence of Gen 4 definition. Recognizing the high failure rates of Gen 4 tubes, ITT chose to improve upon the existing Gen 3 technology and create a "thin-filmed" tube. By keeping the protective ion barrier, but greatly reducing its thickness, ITT was able to maintain the reliability of Gen 3 while�at the same time�delivering on the Army's performance requirements intended for Gen 4. This innovation resulted in the production of the Gen 3 thin-filmed tube, which is now the highest performing Gen 3 tube available.
My understanding from my training is that there is Level 3 and 4 Night vision equipment such as goggles and scopes and Level 3 and 4 IR camera equipment, such as we use. In training we were informed the the technology was almost the same for both. Therefore i assume that it is the same principles. I use both items in my work.
                                                                                                                   Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: boatswain on May 18, 2010, 12:53:06 AM
The quote from onthefence is talking about military night vision equipment for firearms, which is ranked as Gen 0 thru Gen 3, and is export restricted. That's a long stretch from talking about surveillance equipment used domestically in the US, which is not restricted.

I don't see any evidence of:

- "Infrared" cameras (to use Ted's own words) or thermal cameras being rated as "Level 1" through "Level 4".

- The FCC having any role or power in restricting the sale of such cameras as stated by Ted. If the FCC had taken such an action, it would be easy to identify, unless you are willing to indulge conspiracy theories. It would be interesting to talk to someone at FLIR and see what they think of this story.

In my opinion, these minor details along with the lack of any corroboration at all puts a serious hole in the credibility of this testimony. It's the sort of detail that you would expect someone to get wrong if they were making it up.

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 18, 2010, 01:55:45 AM
The quote from onthefence is talking about military night vision equipment for firearms, which is ranked as Gen 0 thru Gen 3, and is export restricted. That's a long stretch from talking about surveillance equipment used domestically in the US, which is not restricted.

I don't see any evidence of:

- "Infrared" cameras (to use Ted's own words) or thermal cameras being rated as "Level 1" through "Level 4".

- The FCC having any role or power in restricting the sale of such cameras as stated by Ted. If the FCC had taken such an action, it would be easy to identify, unless you are willing to indulge conspiracy theories. It would be interesting to talk to someone at FLIR and see what they think of this story.

In my opinion, these minor details along with the lack of any corroboration at all puts a serious hole in the credibility of this testimony. It's the sort of detail that you would expect someone to get wrong if they were making it up.
The term Level 3 and Level 4 were used by the Representatives of the company providing our equipment and in the documents that i received from the Manufacturer and the Government agencies i mentioned. I agree it would be beneficial to speak with someone at FLIR or some other experts on this technology. Maybe they could define and describe exactly what LEVEL really means and the difference between LEVEL and GENERATION, if any. I can only relate what i know to be fact on my behalf and only give what information that will not jeopardize the mission of my work and the safety of my teammates. I am searching for an answer, i hope to find in my lifetime.
                                                                                                                       Thanks, Ted   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: majicbar on May 18, 2010, 05:11:14 AM
From what I understand, the level 4 IR sees a longer wavelength that allows the user to see through walls and is therefore useful as a sniper scope for target within buildings which normally blind the target from the shooter. Watching a show on History Channel on snipers I was shocked to see how effective a large caliber round is at shooting through a wall and deliver kill shots. Presumably this capability is known to our own snipers, but largely unknown otherwise and we must have become alarmed at giving this capability to others.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: boatswain on May 19, 2010, 12:04:46 AM
From what I understand, the level 4 IR sees a longer wavelength that allows the user to see through walls and is therefore useful as a sniper scope for target within buildings which normally blind the target from the shooter. Watching a show on History Channel on snipers I was shocked to see how effective a large caliber round is at shooting through a wall and deliver kill shots. Presumably this capability is known to our own snipers, but largely unknown otherwise and we must have become alarmed at giving this capability to others.

What is your source for this info? History Channel?  ::)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on May 19, 2010, 01:56:48 PM
Ted did you observe the craft through the image generated by an infrared camera? From your current testimony, I understand this is not the case. So are you thinking that the infrared camera's self-emitted electromagnetic radiation may have somehow interfered with the cloak and this allowed you to see the craft (in the visible light spectrum using your own eyes, unaided by a camera of any sort)?

The FCC allocates spectra use below 300GHz in the radio wavelengths. Infra-red goes above 300GHz frequency up to that of visible light - and yes, there is cross-over with terrahertz frequenices which will be used in security applications to see through walls etc. Now the FCC also oversees devices which intentionally or unintentionally emit radiation which may compromise communication. Part 15 (.47.) of FCC regulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation)

I suspect that OTF is correct - the term generation seems more plausible for a manufacturer. Ted's trainer possibly confused training terminology {qualifications in thermography (level) or surveillance (level) or system application -security (level)} with device terminology as shown here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera)

 Alternatively, the manufacturer could have categorised according to a sensor response division scheme which divides up the band based on the response of various detectors:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared)
 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 19, 2010, 03:20:19 PM
Ted did you observe the craft through the image generated by an infrared camera? From your current testimony, I understand this is not the case. So are you thinking that the infrared camera's self-emitted electromagnetic radiation may have somehow interfered with the cloak and this allowed you to see the craft (in the visible light spectrum using your own eyes, unaided by a camera of any sort)?

The FCC allocates spectra use below 300GHz in the radio wavelengths. Infra-red goes above 300GHz frequency up to that of visible light - and yes, there is cross-over with terrahertz frequenices which will be used in security applications to see through walls etc. Now the FCC also oversees devices which intentionally or unintentionally emit radiation which may compromise communication. Part 15 (.47.) of FCC regulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation)

I suspect that OTF is correct - the term generation seems more plausible for a manufacturer. Ted's trainer possibly confused training terminology {qualifications in thermography (level) or surveillance (level) or system application -security (level)} with device terminology as shown here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera)

 Alternatively, the manufacturer could have categorised according to a sensor response division scheme which divides up the band based on the response of various detectors:

  • Very-long wave infrared (VLWIR): 12 to about 30 micrometers, covered by doped silicon.
  • Near infrared: from 0.7 to 1.0 micrometers (from the approximate end of the response of the human eye to that of silicon).
  • Short-wave infrared: 1.0 to 3 micrometers (from the cut off of silicon to that of the MWIR atmospheric window. InGaAs covers to about 1.8 micrometers; the less sensitive lead salts cover this region.
  • Mid-wave infrared: 3 to 5 micrometers (defined by the atmospheric window and covered by Indium antimonide InSb and HgCdTe and partially by lead selenide PbSe).
  • Long-wave infrared: 8 to 12, or 7 to 14 micrometers: the atmospheric window (Covered by HgCdTe and microbolometers).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared)
The Sighting was visual only. Yes, exactly correct. I believe that the IR equipment that was in operation may have defeated the cloaking effect of the craft. However, this is only speculation on my part as i have no definite proof that this is the case. The IR cameras were first to come to mind as the possible cause due to the technology involved and their close proximity to my sighting. I also thought of the Thermal imaging devices in use, but ruled those out because their were none of these in the area of the sighting. The nearest Thermal Imaging Device was several hundred yards from the point of my sighting, But as i said , I can't be sure what or if the equipment in use played any part in the ability to see this craft. Yes i think the overall confusion stems from the TERMS "LEVEL" and "GENERATION". Our trainer continually used the term LEVEL. Also the Manufacturer referred verbally and in a written memo to LEVEL. I have also heard the term GENERATION used in conjunction with our Night Vision Goggles and other non camera equipment. Again,my training was primarily in the use and on site maintenance of this equipment rather than the overall technical specs and nomenclature. I am left puzzled by fact that none of this equipment picked up anything, including Video, Audio, IR, Thermal, Motion and other classified detection devices. Considering it is my job to insure there is no unauthorized intrusion in the area, it is very disturbing, to say the least.
                                                                                                                Thanks,      Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 19, 2010, 06:08:17 PM
Sounds have now been added to the animated re-creation of Ted's experience. With Ted's help, the following points have been incorporated:

Ted Connors, AL, Drone sighting reconstruction (with sound). (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfPoi4S46ic#)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: majicbar on May 19, 2010, 07:25:24 PM
From what I understand, the level 4 IR sees a longer wavelength that allows the user to see through walls and is therefore useful as a sniper scope for target within buildings which normally blind the target from the shooter. Watching a show on History Channel on snipers I was shocked to see how effective a large caliber round is at shooting through a wall and deliver kill shots. Presumably this capability is known to our own snipers, but largely unknown otherwise and we must have become alarmed at giving this capability to others.

What is your source for this info? History Channel?  ::)

This information is blended from information learned from many sources over the years from sources like the History, Discovery and Science Channels and reading science and technical journals. Most of what I've seen on thermal infrared comes from studies in fields like Astronomy and Physics and televised shows on police and firefighting where the "look through walls" has been demonstrated. Search the Internet and you can find information on far infrared and thermal infrared. Gen 4 infrared capabilities, (level 4) if given to terrorists would open a new avenue for them to cause war on us and I understand Homeland Security's desire to limit this capability to legitimate government uses, as well as their desire not to make this ban public, that would be telling the terrorists, "Here, we think we have a vulnerability you could exploit".

As to why the FCC would be involved?, this is because it involves the use of high speed computers which do not generally meet requirements for general use because of electromagnetic interference given off by these chips. The FCC took two years to approve the use of this equipment used today. I'm sure the manufactures are working to reduce that EMI as it works only to announce its presence and negates its stealthiness.

http://www.x20.org/thermal/LawEnforcement.htm (http://www.x20.org/thermal/LawEnforcement.htm)

http://www.x20.org/thermal/index.htm (http://www.x20.org/thermal/index.htm)

http://www.imaging1.com/thermal/Thermal_weapon_sight.html#Specifications (http://www.imaging1.com/thermal/Thermal_weapon_sight.html#Specifications)

http://www.imaging1.com/nightvision/pvs-14-night-vision.html (http://www.imaging1.com/nightvision/pvs-14-night-vision.html)

http://www.imaging1.com/thermal/MX_1000.html (http://www.imaging1.com/thermal/MX_1000.html)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on May 21, 2010, 09:30:56 PM
Hi Ted,

I know I said I had no further questions to ask you, but this one still remain:

How was the sighting to you as a person? Was it more than "frightful" and was it something you immediately knew was needed for you to respond to in the line of your work, did it "ring a bell" in your mind that this was a crucial reporting issue, or did you observe the following action as a thing that would evolve, so that you'd wait it out, and then report back if it seemed out of the ordinary?


EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 22, 2010, 02:15:31 AM
Hi Ted,

I know I said I had no further questions to ask you, but this one still remain:

How was the sighting to you as a person? Was it more than "frightful" and was it something you immediately knew was needed for you to respond to in the line of your work, did it "ring a bell" in your mind that this was a crucial reporting issue, or did you observe the following action as a thing that would evolve, so that you'd wait it out, and then report back if it seemed out of the ordinary?


EVS
EVS, thanks for the question. My initial reaction as a person upon seeing this object was surprise and shock. I then attempted to gather as much visual information as i could as to the shape, color, sound, and identifiable markings on the craft. At that point my training kicked in and my reaction was that this craft or whatever it was had penetrated our security and might pose a serious threat to my area of responsibility. I felt at that point the Response to the threat was the most important thing. Having the authority to use deadly force if confronted with imminent possibility of my death or injury, i contemplated the possibility of using my sidearm to fire at this object. At the very moment i began to draw my weapon, i got only what i have previously described in my sighting interview with LMH as a feeling of "PURE EVIL" from this craft and knew in my mind at that point, shooting at this craft would be a BIG mistake on my part. Whether this was some TELEPATHIC message sent by this craft to me or just my gut instinct i am not sure. My next thought was to get some hard proof of what i was seeing so at that point i thought of the only recording device i had with me at the time, which was my personal cell phone which had a camera.I removed my phone from its carrier on my belt and took 3 shots in succession with it. After taking the shots, i then called my partner on the security system radio to report this incident and ask if he had any intrusion alarms or any indication on our monitoring devices of this craft or anything out of the ordinary.My partner reported to me that there were no alarms or any abnormal events being recorded. I continued to monitor the crafts actions and make mental notes of it's activity including it's position in regards to the tree, myself and the crafts direction of travel and speed. After the event was over i had a chance to document what i had witnessed in writing because i wanted to make sure i had all the facts of the sighting correct before reporting this incident to my superiors. In retrospect, i thought i had enough weapons firepower to shoot this thing down, but as i have said, this thing seemed to be telling me through thought process or whatever means it has to communicate, "DON'T TRY IT" !! , and somehow i knew "IT" meant it.                                                               Thanks,  Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on May 22, 2010, 05:32:25 PM
Hi Ted,

Sure is great to have you here answering questions.  Thanks so much for all you can report.

I have a couple of questions. 

I'm sure you read Isaac's report and his description of what allows the drones to be visible.  He talks about a device given to us by ETs that has the ability to jam the drone's cloaking technology.  He went on to postulate that it was that technology that was accidentally turned on nearby.  Do you think it's possible that this jamming technology was being experimented with at your facility or a nearby science/technical research center?

Second question,

Do you have any idea or gut feeling what was the purpose or mission of the drone you saw?  Maybe there was some clue in it's movement?  Something it was more interested in?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 23, 2010, 01:13:45 AM
Hi Ted,

Sure is great to have you here answering questions.  Thanks so much for all you can report.

I have a couple of questions. 

I'm sure you read Isaac's report and his description of what allows the drones to be visible.  He talks about a device given to us by ETs that has the ability to jam the drone's cloaking technology.  He went on to postulate that it was that technology that was accidentally turned on nearby.  Do you think it's possible that this jamming technology was being experimented with at your facility or a nearby science/technical research center?

Second question,

Do you have any idea or gut feeling what was the purpose or mission of the drone you saw?  Maybe there was some clue in it's movement?  Something it was more interested in?
Thanks for the kind comments and great questions. It is good to have a forum such as this in which to document these events.

A1. I have had a chance to read some of Issac's report. I am not sure if it is some alien technology or technology that we ourselves have developed that jams the cloaking of these drone craft. Or possibly the craft allowing itself to be seen for it's own purpose. Since my sighting, i have tried to research some on the reasons and missions of these craft and come up with ideas on why they seem to appear and disappear. I have read some of the theories on technologies that may have been given to us by aliens and ones that propose that we have back engineered some of this alien technology. I don't seem to be any closer now than i was at the time of my sighting to figure out why it appeared to me on that morning. The only possible explanation i could come up with was the IR technology that was in use at close proximity to my sighting. I am not aware of any nearby Science, Technology, Research Center other than some possible secret research or testing that might possibly be going on at the Air War University or some other area at Maxwell AFB.

A2. This is the "MILLION DOLLAR" question. I have no clue as to the mission or missions of these craft. The appearances of these craft and the areas they are seen in don't seem to form any pattern or follow any particular program for surveillance of or detection of Military, Civilian, or other areas of interest as we as humans perceive it. My on theory is that these are test flights possibly to test the systems and work out the bugs before they begin whatever missions they are assigned to. But this is just my theory. I don't know if they are designed, built, and operated by US or ET. This is still such a MYSTERY to me. I know this is no real answer to your question, but it's all i got at this point.

                                                                                                                  Thanks,   Ted

                                 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on May 24, 2010, 10:37:28 AM
Ted did you observe the craft through the image generated by an infrared camera? From your current testimony, I understand this is not the case. So are you thinking that the infrared camera's self-emitted electromagnetic radiation may have somehow interfered with the cloak and this allowed you to see the craft (in the visible light spectrum using your own eyes, unaided by a camera of any sort)?

The FCC allocates spectra use below 300GHz in the radio wavelengths. Infra-red goes above 300GHz frequency up to that of visible light - and yes, there is cross-over with terrahertz frequenices which will be used in security applications to see through walls etc. Now the FCC also oversees devices which intentionally or unintentionally emit radiation which may compromise communication. Part 15 (.47.) of FCC regulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation)

I suspect that OTF is correct - the term generation seems more plausible for a manufacturer. Ted's trainer possibly confused training terminology {qualifications in thermography (level) or surveillance (level) or system application -security (level)} with device terminology as shown here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera)

 Alternatively, the manufacturer could have categorised according to a sensor response division scheme which divides up the band based on the response of various detectors:

  • Very-long wave infrared (VLWIR): 12 to about 30 micrometers, covered by doped silicon.
  • Near infrared: from 0.7 to 1.0 micrometers (from the approximate end of the response of the human eye to that of silicon).
  • Short-wave infrared: 1.0 to 3 micrometers (from the cut off of silicon to that of the MWIR atmospheric window. InGaAs covers to about 1.8 micrometers; the less sensitive lead salts cover this region.
  • Mid-wave infrared: 3 to 5 micrometers (defined by the atmospheric window and covered by Indium antimonide InSb and HgCdTe and partially by lead selenide PbSe).
  • Long-wave infrared: 8 to 12, or 7 to 14 micrometers: the atmospheric window (Covered by HgCdTe and microbolometers).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared)
The Sighting was visual only. Yes, exactly correct. I believe that the IR equipment that was in operation may have defeated the cloaking effect of the craft. However, this is only speculation on my part as i have no definite proof that this is the case. The IR cameras were first to come to mind as the possible cause due to the technology involved and their close proximity to my sighting. I also thought of the Thermal imaging devices in use, but ruled those out because their were none of these in the area of the sighting. The nearest Thermal Imaging Device was several hundred yards from the point of my sighting, But as i said , I can't be sure what or if the equipment in use played any part in the ability to see this craft. Yes i think the overall confusion stems from the TERMS "LEVEL" and "GENERATION". Our trainer continually used the term LEVEL. Also the Manufacturer referred verbally and in a written memo to LEVEL. I have also heard the term GENERATION used in conjunction with our Night Vision Goggles and other non camera equipment. Again,my training was primarily in the use and on site maintenance of this equipment rather than the overall technical specs and nomenclature. I am left puzzled by fact that none of this equipment picked up anything, including Video, Audio, IR, Thermal, Motion and other classified detection devices. Considering it is my job to insure there is no unauthorized intrusion in the area, it is very disturbing, to say the least.
                                                                                                                Thanks,      Ted
Ted,
-   Assuming the manufacturer IR cameraâ??s were banned by the DoD for non-military use, then am I right to assume that the product was recalled/replaced at the facility you describe?
-   Are you able to compare the technical specifications and identify differences between the â??level 3 and 4â?? products â?? such as the spectral range - wavelength/frequency etc?
-   At the time of your sighting, can you estimate the distance and orientation between the IR camera face and the drone?
-   What was the approximate date of the DoD notice?

For your interest, in December 2007 the DoD released an updated military standard relating to equipment EM radiation:
MIL-STD-461F, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERFACE STANDARD: REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT (10 DEC 2007).
The previous spec:
http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461E_8676/ (http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461E_8676/)
was superceded by:
http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461F_19035/ (http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461F_19035/)
 In this standard, the FCC is mentioned on several occasions in at least 2 sections â?? and it is mentioned in other related .mil standards relating to testing of unintentional device radiation.
For example:
Electrical interfaces with military equipment are often complex and require sophisticated test equipment to simulate and evaluate the interface. This equipment usually must be located outside of the shielded enclosure to achieve sufficient isolation and prevent it from contaminating the ambient and responding to susceptibility signals.
The shielded enclosure also prevents radiation of applied susceptibility signals from interfering with local antenna-connected receivers. The most obvious potential offender is the RS103 test. However, other susceptibility tests can result in substantial radiated energy which may violate Federal Communication Commission (FCC) rules. Shielded enclosures with the following
characteristics will typically provide the required isolation:
a. Shielding effectiveness of 80 decibels (dB) with respect to electric fields and plane waves above 10 kHz as measured in accordance with MIL-STD-285.
b. Powerline filtering of 80 dB attenuation at frequencies above 10 kHz as measured in accordance with MIL-STD-220.

Changes are reviewed here
http://www.tracglobal.com/article/new-emc-standard-mil-std-461f-supersedes-mil-std-461e.html (http://www.tracglobal.com/article/new-emc-standard-mil-std-461f-supersedes-mil-std-461e.html)
and in more detail here:
http://www.tmworld.com/file/4545-paper_by_Steve_Ferguson.doc?force=true (http://www.tmworld.com/file/4545-paper_by_Steve_Ferguson.doc?force=true)

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 24, 2010, 04:56:27 PM
Ted did you observe the craft through the image generated by an infrared camera? From your current testimony, I understand this is not the case. So are you thinking that the infrared camera's self-emitted electromagnetic radiation may have somehow interfered with the cloak and this allowed you to see the craft (in the visible light spectrum using your own eyes, unaided by a camera of any sort)?

The FCC allocates spectra use below 300GHz in the radio wavelengths. Infra-red goes above 300GHz frequency up to that of visible light - and yes, there is cross-over with terrahertz frequenices which will be used in security applications to see through walls etc. Now the FCC also oversees devices which intentionally or unintentionally emit radiation which may compromise communication. Part 15 (.47.) of FCC regulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation)

I suspect that OTF is correct - the term generation seems more plausible for a manufacturer. Ted's trainer possibly confused training terminology {qualifications in thermography (level) or surveillance (level) or system application -security (level)} with device terminology as shown here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera)

 Alternatively, the manufacturer could have categorised according to a sensor response division scheme which divides up the band based on the response of various detectors:

  • Very-long wave infrared (VLWIR): 12 to about 30 micrometers, covered by doped silicon.
  • Near infrared: from 0.7 to 1.0 micrometers (from the approximate end of the response of the human eye to that of silicon).
  • Short-wave infrared: 1.0 to 3 micrometers (from the cut off of silicon to that of the MWIR atmospheric window. InGaAs covers to about 1.8 micrometers; the less sensitive lead salts cover this region.
  • Mid-wave infrared: 3 to 5 micrometers (defined by the atmospheric window and covered by Indium antimonide InSb and HgCdTe and partially by lead selenide PbSe).
  • Long-wave infrared: 8 to 12, or 7 to 14 micrometers: the atmospheric window (Covered by HgCdTe and microbolometers).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared)
The Sighting was visual only. Yes, exactly correct. I believe that the IR equipment that was in operation may have defeated the cloaking effect of the craft. However, this is only speculation on my part as i have no definite proof that this is the case. The IR cameras were first to come to mind as the possible cause due to the technology involved and their close proximity to my sighting. I also thought of the Thermal imaging devices in use, but ruled those out because their were none of these in the area of the sighting. The nearest Thermal Imaging Device was several hundred yards from the point of my sighting, But as i said , I can't be sure what or if the equipment in use played any part in the ability to see this craft. Yes i think the overall confusion stems from the TERMS "LEVEL" and "GENERATION". Our trainer continually used the term LEVEL. Also the Manufacturer referred verbally and in a written memo to LEVEL. I have also heard the term GENERATION used in conjunction with our Night Vision Goggles and other non camera equipment. Again,my training was primarily in the use and on site maintenance of this equipment rather than the overall technical specs and nomenclature. I am left puzzled by fact that none of this equipment picked up anything, including Video, Audio, IR, Thermal, Motion and other classified detection devices. Considering it is my job to insure there is no unauthorized intrusion in the area, it is very disturbing, to say the least.
                                                                                                                Thanks,      Ted
Ted,
-   Assuming the manufacturer IR cameraâ??s were banned by the DoD for non-military use, then am I right to assume that the product was recalled/replaced at the facility you describe?
-   Are you able to compare the technical specifications and identify differences between the â??level 3 and 4â?? products â?? such as the spectral range - wavelength/frequency etc?
-   At the time of your sighting, can you estimate the distance and orientation between the IR camera face and the drone?
-   What was the approximate date of the DoD notice?

For your interest, in December 2007 the DoD released an updated military standard relating to equipment EM radiation:
MIL-STD-461F, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERFACE STANDARD: REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT (10 DEC 2007).
The previous spec:
http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461E_8676/ (http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461E_8676/)
was superceded by:
http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461F_19035/ (http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461F_19035/)
 In this standard, the FCC is mentioned on several occasions in at least 2 sections â?? and it is mentioned in other related .mil standards relating to testing of unintentional device radiation.
For example:
Electrical interfaces with military equipment are often complex and require sophisticated test equipment to simulate and evaluate the interface. This equipment usually must be located outside of the shielded enclosure to achieve sufficient isolation and prevent it from contaminating the ambient and responding to susceptibility signals.
The shielded enclosure also prevents radiation of applied susceptibility signals from interfering with local antenna-connected receivers. The most obvious potential offender is the RS103 test. However, other susceptibility tests can result in substantial radiated energy which may violate Federal Communication Commission (FCC) rules. Shielded enclosures with the following
characteristics will typically provide the required isolation:
a. Shielding effectiveness of 80 decibels (dB) with respect to electric fields and plane waves above 10 kHz as measured in accordance with MIL-STD-285.
b. Powerline filtering of 80 dB attenuation at frequencies above 10 kHz as measured in accordance with MIL-STD-220.

Changes are reviewed here
http://www.tracglobal.com/article/new-emc-standard-mil-std-461f-supersedes-mil-std-461e.html (http://www.tracglobal.com/article/new-emc-standard-mil-std-461f-supersedes-mil-std-461e.html)
and in more detail here:
http://www.tmworld.com/file/4545-paper_by_Steve_Ferguson.doc?force=true (http://www.tmworld.com/file/4545-paper_by_Steve_Ferguson.doc?force=true)
Thanks for all the great information. I still haven't had time to read through it all, but will as soon as time allows. To answer your questions, Yes, The equipment was replaced in late November 2007. The original equipment was picked up by the manufacturer a few days later. As far as the technical specs are concerned, that information resides with one of my superiors and i do not have access to that documentation. To explain, in my work of on site maintenance of this equipment i am given work orders to change out a particular piece of equipment or change a defective element of it or change the location of that equipment. As to the distance from the IR camera face and the craft, i would estimate between 50 and 75ft. I am not sure of the exact date of the DOD notice, but i received it personally the third week in September. I am not sure of the exact day. I do recall the date of the Ban on sales was effective January 1st. 2008. The change from Level 3 equipment to Level 4 equipment took 6 days to complete and was fully operational as of December 2nd 2007.

                                                                                                           Thanks,        Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 24, 2010, 04:59:18 PM
Ted did you observe the craft through the image generated by an infrared camera? From your current testimony, I understand this is not the case. So are you thinking that the infrared camera's self-emitted electromagnetic radiation may have somehow interfered with the cloak and this allowed you to see the craft (in the visible light spectrum using your own eyes, unaided by a camera of any sort)?

The FCC allocates spectra use below 300GHz in the radio wavelengths. Infra-red goes above 300GHz frequency up to that of visible light - and yes, there is cross-over with terrahertz frequenices which will be used in security applications to see through walls etc. Now the FCC also oversees devices which intentionally or unintentionally emit radiation which may compromise communication. Part 15 (.47.) of FCC regulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintentional_radiator)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_allocation)

I suspect that OTF is correct - the term generation seems more plausible for a manufacturer. Ted's trainer possibly confused training terminology {qualifications in thermography (level) or surveillance (level) or system application -security (level)} with device terminology as shown here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_camera)

 Alternatively, the manufacturer could have categorised according to a sensor response division scheme which divides up the band based on the response of various detectors:

  • Very-long wave infrared (VLWIR): 12 to about 30 micrometers, covered by doped silicon.
  • Near infrared: from 0.7 to 1.0 micrometers (from the approximate end of the response of the human eye to that of silicon).
  • Short-wave infrared: 1.0 to 3 micrometers (from the cut off of silicon to that of the MWIR atmospheric window. InGaAs covers to about 1.8 micrometers; the less sensitive lead salts cover this region.
  • Mid-wave infrared: 3 to 5 micrometers (defined by the atmospheric window and covered by Indium antimonide InSb and HgCdTe and partially by lead selenide PbSe).
  • Long-wave infrared: 8 to 12, or 7 to 14 micrometers: the atmospheric window (Covered by HgCdTe and microbolometers).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared)
The Sighting was visual only. Yes, exactly correct. I believe that the IR equipment that was in operation may have defeated the cloaking effect of the craft. However, this is only speculation on my part as i have no definite proof that this is the case. The IR cameras were first to come to mind as the possible cause due to the technology involved and their close proximity to my sighting. I also thought of the Thermal imaging devices in use, but ruled those out because their were none of these in the area of the sighting. The nearest Thermal Imaging Device was several hundred yards from the point of my sighting, But as i said , I can't be sure what or if the equipment in use played any part in the ability to see this craft. Yes i think the overall confusion stems from the TERMS "LEVEL" and "GENERATION". Our trainer continually used the term LEVEL. Also the Manufacturer referred verbally and in a written memo to LEVEL. I have also heard the term GENERATION used in conjunction with our Night Vision Goggles and other non camera equipment. Again,my training was primarily in the use and on site maintenance of this equipment rather than the overall technical specs and nomenclature. I am left puzzled by fact that none of this equipment picked up anything, including Video, Audio, IR, Thermal, Motion and other classified detection devices. Considering it is my job to insure there is no unauthorized intrusion in the area, it is very disturbing, to say the least.
                                                                                                                Thanks,      Ted
Ted,
-   Assuming the manufacturer IR cameraâ??s were banned by the DoD for non-military use, then am I right to assume that the product was recalled/replaced at the facility you describe?
-   Are you able to compare the technical specifications and identify differences between the â??level 3 and 4â?? products â?? such as the spectral range - wavelength/frequency etc?
-   At the time of your sighting, can you estimate the distance and orientation between the IR camera face and the drone?
-   What was the approximate date of the DoD notice?

For your interest, in December 2007 the DoD released an updated military standard relating to equipment EM radiation:
MIL-STD-461F, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERFACE STANDARD: REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT (10 DEC 2007).
The previous spec:
http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461E_8676/ (http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461E_8676/)
was superceded by:
http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461F_19035/ (http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD+(0300+-+0499)/MIL-STD-461F_19035/)
 In this standard, the FCC is mentioned on several occasions in at least 2 sections â?? and it is mentioned in other related .mil standards relating to testing of unintentional device radiation.
For example:
Electrical interfaces with military equipment are often complex and require sophisticated test equipment to simulate and evaluate the interface. This equipment usually must be located outside of the shielded enclosure to achieve sufficient isolation and prevent it from contaminating the ambient and responding to susceptibility signals.
The shielded enclosure also prevents radiation of applied susceptibility signals from interfering with local antenna-connected receivers. The most obvious potential offender is the RS103 test. However, other susceptibility tests can result in substantial radiated energy which may violate Federal Communication Commission (FCC) rules. Shielded enclosures with the following
characteristics will typically provide the required isolation:
a. Shielding effectiveness of 80 decibels (dB) with respect to electric fields and plane waves above 10 kHz as measured in accordance with MIL-STD-285.
b. Powerline filtering of 80 dB attenuation at frequencies above 10 kHz as measured in accordance with MIL-STD-220.

Changes are reviewed here
http://www.tracglobal.com/article/new-emc-standard-mil-std-461f-supersedes-mil-std-461e.html (http://www.tracglobal.com/article/new-emc-standard-mil-std-461f-supersedes-mil-std-461e.html)
and in more detail here:
http://www.tmworld.com/file/4545-paper_by_Steve_Ferguson.doc?force=true (http://www.tmworld.com/file/4545-paper_by_Steve_Ferguson.doc?force=true)
Thanks for all the great information. I still haven't had time to read through it all, but will as soon as time allows. To answer your questions, Yes, The equipment was replaced in late November 2007. The original equipment was picked up by the manufacturer a few days later. As far as the technical specs are concerned, that information resides with one of my superiors and i do not have access to that documentation. To explain, in my work of on site maintenance of this equipment i am given work orders to change out a particular piece of equipment or change a defective element of it or change the location of that equipment. As to the distance from the IR camera face and the craft, i would estimate between 50 and 75ft. I am not sure of the exact date of the DOD notice, but i received it personally the third week in September. I am not sure of the exact day. I do recall the date of the Ban on sales was effective January 1st. 2008. The change from Level 3 equipment to Level 4 equipment took 6 days to complete and was fully operational as of December 2nd 2007.

                                                                                                           Thanks,        Ted
CORRECTION, Level 4 to Level 3. sorry, reading and typing not aseasy for me as hitting a moving target. lol
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on May 25, 2010, 10:04:02 AM
With regards to determining the spectral range and other level 3/4 differences, taking into consideration your unwillingness to publically identify the IR camera, perhaps you can contact the manufacturer yourself, perform internet research, or call other organisations which might have sold/used this specific camera? I think it should be possible to determine this information...

Using the IR camera as your reference point, can you estimate the distance beyond which you lost sight of the drone? (I understand from your testimony that it went over the tree line and out of sight - as opposed to gradually fading or suddenly disappearing?) What was the distance travelled?

If the distance to the camera was over 50ft when the drone was stationary, then at that distance the drone would have been affected by very low intensity EM radiation, if emitted by the IR camera: less than 0.035% than at the device (taking it as a point source with negligible scattering). This intensity rapidly drops off the more the drone travelled away from the source.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 25, 2010, 03:06:53 PM
A1. Shortly after i received the "Ban Memo" from the manufacturer, i contacted them with my questions in regards to the ban. I was told to refer to the Governmental Agency documents for any questions i might have. Sometime in 2008, i tried this avenue again as well as employing some help from an unnamed outside source who is active in the Drone Research field. Again, we both ran into a "SMOKESCREEN" from the manufacturer. I did not attempt to get any Technical Information during these conversations, only find out the purpose behind the ban on sales of this equipment. My reluctance to identify the make and model of this equipment is only due to the chance that it might reveal my true identity. I as well as other trusted people have researched the internet as well as other sources for technical sources on these devices. I do not use the term CAMERAS, because there is more equipment involved than just the IR Cameras. We have also made many calls to other manufacturers who might market similar devices or have knowledge of this technology. As of this time, we still have not gotten any real answers or been able to get any technical data. This is still ongoing and i will continue to try to get some information.

A2. I would estimate from the point of the IR Camera to the tree line i described, it was in the area of 70 to 80 yards. The total distance traveled i would estimate at about 100 yards. The craft disappeared behind the tree line as i described in my interview with LMH, headed almost due West.

A3. From my experience and what i know of IR camera technology you are correct, but this Level 4 equipment may have made a difference. Again, as i have said on many occasions, i can't be sure the IR camera itself had or did not have an effect on the fact that i was able to see this craft. My assumption that the IR camera was the reason is purely speculation on my part given that this equipment was the only thing that i know of operating within the immediate area of my sighting, with the exception of my personal cell phone and my 2 way Security Radio.

                                                                                                 Thanks,            Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on May 25, 2010, 05:47:04 PM
Thanks Ted.

Have you tried resellers, indirect suppliers rather than directly from the manufacturer? Unless specifics come forward, then nothing will come of this but speculation...

such as...  ;D

If the drone was visible 70 yards from the camera, then the unintentional EM radiation striking the drone would have had a really really low intensity... quite surprising if it interferred with the drone's cloak. This implies that a specific frequency or sequence of frequencies must have somehow remotely deactivated the metamaterial cloak in the visible light spectrum only (and why it would not then appear on standard surveillance cameras during the early hours of your sighting is inexplicable - by me). Why this does not happen more often with all the inadvertent EM noise generated by our civilisation, I have no idea... a rare sequence of noise or high frequency combination perhaps.

Isaac suggests this can happen over a distance of many miles...
'The reason they're suddenly visible, however, is another matter entirely. These crafts, assuming they're anything like the hardware I worked with in the 80's (assuming they're better, in fact), are equipped with technology that enables invisibility. That ability can be controlled both on board the craft, and remotely. However, what's important in this case is that this invisibility can also be disrupted by other technology. Think of it like radar jamming. I would bet my life savings (since I know this has happened before) that these craft are becoming visible and then returning to invisibility arbitrarily, probably unintentionally, and undoubtedly for only short periods, due to the activity of a kind of disrupting technology being set off elsewhere, but nearby. I'm especially sure of this in the case of the Big Basin sightings, were the witnesses themselves reported seeing the craft just appear and disappear. This is especially likely because of the way the witness described one of the appearances being only a momentary flicker, which is consistent with the unintentional, intermittent triggering of such a device.

It's no surprise that these sightings are all taking place in California, and especially the Saratoga/South Bay area. Not far from Saratoga is Mountain View/Sunnyvale, home to Moffett Field and the NASA Ames Research center. Again, I'd be willing to bet just about anything that the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these nearby craft was inadvertently triggered, probably during some kind of experiment, at the exact moment they were being seen. Miles away, in Big Basin, the witnesses were in the right place at the right time and saw the results of this disruption with their own eyes. God knows what else was suddenly appearing in the skies at that moment, and who else may have seen it. I've had some direct contact with this device, or at least a device capable of the same thing, and this kind of mistake is not unprecedented. I am personally aware of at least one other incident in which this kind of technology was accidentally set off, resulting in the sudden visibility of normally invisible things. '


 


Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 25, 2010, 06:14:40 PM
Good Point! This might the path of least resistance. The only reason for not contacting commercial resellers and such would be the Knowledge of the product and it's usage in my specific work. My search for an answer has been anything but easy! Given the fact of having to protect my identity as well as that of my employer and also the identity and safety of my coworkers and the purpose of our mission, and the many dead ends reached during my search, it sometimes seems easier just to give it up. That is my reason for joining this forum, to get new ideas from people like yourself who just want to get an answer. I have another theory that maybe this "UNCLOAKING" of this craft may have been purely accidental as Issac seems to indicate has happened in previous sighting. Maybe we are focusing too much on our possible technology detecting this craft and should concentrate on what problems or user error it may be experiencing itself. Maybe these were test flights to work out the bugs as i have suggested before and the drop in recent sightings means the bugs have been worked out. In that case, whats next ???
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on May 25, 2010, 09:54:55 PM
Thanks. Isaac made even better points, based on his knowledge of the technology - so I would use his words as a guide:

'what's important in this case is that this invisibility can also be disrupted by other technology. Think of it like radar jamming.'

That's why the more technical information you can provide, the better. 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 25, 2010, 11:00:13 PM
Thanks, I still hold true to my original "GUT" feeling that the IR equipment in use in the area of my sighting is the most reasonable and logical reason behind the ability to see this craft even if only for a brief time. There is "SOMETHING" about this spectrum that must have an effect on this crafts ability to cloak itself. I think if we could find a BRILLIANT mind in the field of IR optics and technology, we might possibly make some progress in this direction. I, myself am far from an expert on IR technology and have depended on others to guide me along. My training in this field is limited to basic maintenance of the equipment in my charge. The thing that really got me thinking along this line was the sudden and more than coincidental ban on the IR equipment we were using and all the Governmental involvement in this ban. If all that had not occurred, i wonder if i would have pursued this event as i have done over the past 3 years. There MUST be an answer, a reason, a purpose, an agenda, or at least some explanation!!!

                                                                                                                 Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 25, 2010, 11:57:11 PM
Isaac suggests ...

I realize that Isaac did write a lot about his own thoughts, so I don't want to get caught up in what might be just opinions about the 2007 sightings, especially since there were no papers to support that.

I am open to the possibility that the 2007 sightings might be 3D projections. This was pointed out in the in the "Q4-86 Research Report":  2. Three-dimensional image recorder/projector.

A projection, could also explain disappearing, and the odd movement that Ted described, and heaven forbid ... the odd shadows in the Raj image. A projection could also explain the apparent lack of inertia that was described by various witnesses.

I'm just saying, that cloaking may not have been part of these sightings.

Of course science has no example of such a projector, or anti-gravity, or cloaking for that matter. I'm just using the clues from the witnesses to provide theories. OK, maybe science has some examples of cloaking, but it is very immature compared to what the drones are reported to be doing, and still does not explain the apparent lack of inertia.

The word "recorder" may explain the reason why the drones are there.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 26, 2010, 12:28:34 AM
Thanks, I find that a very intriguing theory, and a very distinct possibility in my sighting. What if this craft was not real and just a 3D projection. As i was not able to reach out and physically touch this craft, it could have been projected. Had i taken a shot at it as i first intended, i might have come away with a different perspective on this craft if the bullets passed through this image and inflicted no damage on this craft or brought it to the ground. Also it might explain the fading out effect of the wires leading from the top of the craft and the transitional movement it made from one point to another with the image ghosting from point to point before becoming clear and solid again. The IR cameras may have just been coincidental in this event or may have had some effect on disrupting the projection of this image. Great Theory that i had not given much thought to because it all seemed so real to me. Maybe part of it's purpose is to fool the mind into thinking that it is real.

                                                                                                           Thanks,     Ted   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on May 26, 2010, 06:01:18 PM
For the reasons that:
- the 'PACL q385 Inventory Review' shows a photo of a physical asset - the 'rings' - which seem to be consistently present in the drone sightings including (from my understanding) Ted's sighting
- Issac and the PACL 'Q4-86 Research Report' refer to anti-gravity technology and retrieved ET craft subjected to their back-engineering efforts, physical parts of which were identified in the report photographs
- Isaac describes invisibility technology and cloaking malfunctions related to these ET drone craft which were triggered by external, accidental 'jamming'
- that Ted's sighting has symbols/characters which match other sightings and the physical 'language' shown on the assets A1/A2/A3 as well as the PACL LAP.
- and finally, that presumably an ET-derived 3D projector could project any image which need not posses the characteristics described above and with this in mind, then I can think of no meaningful, logical reason why an 'alarming' image of a exterrestrial drone craft would be projected to a security guard 'Ted' in the early hours of the morning at a sensitive US facility (as opposed to say projecting a less 'alarming' image of a conventional helicopter or jet-powered human craft to a more meaningful audience etc)

then for these reasons I am inclined to interpret the PACL report and Issacs claims relating to the drone sightings, (if they are to be believed) as referring to an actual, physical ET craft present in Earth's atmosphere. This is why I would encourage 'Ted' to come forward with as much technical data on the IR camera's as is possible.

Conversely, I would interpret the ET three dimensional image recorder/projector described in the PACL report as a technological device which Isaac's team were trying to back-engineer (and in 1986 had not successfully done so*) which like the anti-gravity generator... were physically sourced from the ET drone craft present in our atmosphere - according to Isaac. Whilst we have some description of the crafts themselves, we have none on the nature of the 3d projector or why it would be used in the middle of the night to project a replica image of ET physical assets to a powerless 'Ted'.

I cannot, however, deny the possibility that the image described by 'Ted' was a projection, nor can we deny the possibility that 'Ted's' statements and other drone sightings are all part of an elaborate hoax, albeit with the addtion of the PACL report, it becomes a sophisticated exercise for some unknown purpose. Without more data, this is all speculation and the only winner is the system which perpetuates  plausible deniability and public manipulation.

----
* Note by 2010 the 'extraction' back-engineering process described by Isaac may have been successful - given that there are some amazing 3d projectors now coming onto commercial markets. See EVS's post here:
http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=161.msg7150#msg7150 (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=161.msg7150#msg7150)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Nodnunk on May 27, 2010, 08:23:11 PM
What if this craft was not real and just a 3D projection.

Wouldn't some sort of projected image be self luminous? That is, the brightness of the image would be independent of the ambient lighting. As described, the image was dim because the sighting was during the twilight before dawn.

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 27, 2010, 09:15:19 PM
What if this craft was not real and just a 3D projection.

Wouldn't some sort of projected image be self luminous? That is, the brightness of the image would be independent of the ambient lighting. As described, the image was dim because the sighting was during the twilight before dawn.

When I suggested that 3D projection was a possibility, I mainly meant that it was mentioned in the CARET paper. It is just a theory now that some sort of projection was used. Yes, all the 3D projection that we currently know of uses light to illuminate something in the dark, there is nothing that actually adds darkness to lighted space, so I think it will be a long time, if ever, before we see lifelike holograms presented in full daylight. And there is nothing that we know of that can affect empty space to act like matter to reflect, refract, and absorb light.

Maybe the 3D projection/recording mentioned in the CARET papers is a technology that we see as magic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws). The writer(s) of that CARET document may have tried interpreting something they saw, and the best relation to known concepts was "Three-dimensional image recorder/projector".

I only mentioned 3D projection because some of the properties of projection are apparent in the witness testimony. Maybe an analogy would be to show someone from 1000 years ago an LED, they would probably say that it is a "cold fire". They would surely miss out on all the other properties of making an LED shine, like wires, batteries, semiconductors, transparent plastic, current limiting, clean-room manufacturing techniques, etc..

The points that you and iamiamiam made are much more grounded in reality, and much more weight should be given to that over fanciful 3D projection theories.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on May 29, 2010, 01:10:37 AM
Some thoughts:

1.  Ty Big Basin sighting might have been just an accident due to the fact that someone was testing a device at a nearby facility.  I feel this is what Isaac thought.  Whoever was doing the testing might have had no idea there was a Drone nearby.

2. This planet is under 24/7 surveillance by extraterrestrials.  We have no idea how many Drones are on duty .  There may be many at any one time.

3. Linda Howe continues to report that cattle blood/tissue samplings are currently still happening.  Cattle are still being seen floating up in shafts of light and being found dropped dead on the ground.

4.  What with cattle mutilations, crop designs [the new season has begun], and the Drones, you would have to deny reality to say that this planet is not under very close observation by entities from elsewhere.

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 29, 2010, 02:12:06 AM
In one of the many conversations i had with Linda Moulton Howe after my drone sighting, we discussed the possibility of a link between the drones and cattle mutilations. She seemed to feel that there may be some common thread there as well as with crop circles.These drones seemed to be possibly designed to be able to perform many tasks including surveillance, sampling of environment and life forms, mapping of terrain, communications monitoring. offensive and defensive counter measures, cloaking, altering vegetation, projecting holographic images, transmitting telepathic messages, and other such tasks. It seems reasonable to me that these craft have quite a few uses and are able to perform whatever task might might be assigned. I know from my own sighting that they have quite a few options at their command.

                                                                                                               Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 04, 2010, 10:04:49 PM
I know from my own sighting that they have quite a few options at their command.                                                                                                               Ted

Hi Ted, can you be more specific about why they may have a few options at their command? Was it something you saw, or experienced during the sighting?

Thanks,
EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 04, 2010, 10:26:46 PM
I think Linda see's everything connected to cattle mutilations. No disrespect but the vibe I get is it is hard for her to see with fresh impartial eyes. Kind of like Bill from UFO hunters, he would jump to all kinds of conclusions and then his team mates thankfully would reign him in.

I mean anything is possible, but I don't see the connection. They look more like rovers like we put on mars except spookier and obviously pimped out  ;D with stealth and all the other alien bells and whistles.

It would be different if these drones seemed to be piloted like your basic saucer. Then I could see a more obvious connection. But the drones like I said remind me of a rover an information gatherer. Maybe a flying eye in the sky.

I am enjoying your post Ted thank you for sharing your experience.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 05, 2010, 01:16:37 AM
I really am just relating to the actions of the drone that i have already discussed here in the forum. The unusual transitional movement of the craft, The ability of this craft to communicate telepathically with me. The Ability to remain undetected from all the detection devices in use. And The change in the condition of the tree from 2007 until present. I came away from my sighting with the feeling that this craft had quite a few options at it's command. It is still hard for me to explain fully the effect this sighting had on me, but i feel that this craft had the ability to perform almost any task it that it needed to protect itself, to complete it's mission, to communicate with me, to remain undetected from the electronic detection devices, and to react and respond to my visual sighting, whether due to a glitch in it's operation or by it's own choice to allow me to see it visually. The feeling that i came away with was this craft was infused with only what i can describe as HUMAN emotions or at least the basics of of rational Human thoughts and reaction. It gave me the same feeling as encountering a very clever and resourceful person rather than a mechanical device. That is why i came away with the feeling that this THING was EVIL. Not in a Technological or mechanical way, but in a human way such as some person that had intentions of getting what it wanted and had the power and the ability to do it!!

                                                                                                Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 05, 2010, 01:36:48 AM
These discussions took place in 2007 just after my sighting. I am not sure if LMH still feels as strong about that now as we have not discussed the possibilities of a relationship between the drones and cattle mutilations, and crop circles since that time. It does seem to bring up an interesting possibility though since these drone craft seem to be mission oriented. In that they seem to be configured for certain applications for whatever mission they are to be assigned to. But that is just my opinion from from my own sighting and experience. I know Linda to be a very through investigator from my own experience relating my sighting. I think at the time of our discussion she was looking for a possible common THREAD to tie these instances of what she calls "HIGH STRANGENESS" together. I am not sure if UFO's, DRONES, CROP CIRCLES, and CATTLE MUTILATIONS are related, but some of the facts and information from these events do seem rather similar in their overall appearance.
                                                                                                   Thanks,      Ted

                         .
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 05, 2010, 02:22:04 AM
Hi Ted,

That's exactly why it's important to know what you experienced at your sighting, as it could be polluted by suggestions, even from Linda, as she might suggest things that actually didn't happen at your sighting! It's very important that what you saw and felt during your sighting are as close to what you remember!

It's now clear that what you saw was a real craft, as an image could not explain what you felt at the time.

You have been exposed to a real craft, as it's consistant with what you describe during your sighting.

Thanks,
EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 05, 2010, 03:06:58 AM
Thanks EVS. Since my sighting in 2007, i have explored every possibility that i could think of as why this craft appeared and what it's purpose and intentions were. Many people have suggested many things and have given their opinions on this event. I value and appreciate all comments, opinions, theories and ideas that might help to solve this mystery. I have approached this whole strange occurrence in my life with an open mind, because i feel that in order to find an answer i may have to look under every rock, but at the same time i am sure of certain unshakable facts of my sighting and the events of that morning as they have been burned into my memory forever!! Thanks, for your and everyone's support, questions, ideas, theories, skepticism and yes, even disbelief here on the forum as i value it all in my search for an answer not just for myself but for everyone interested in this phenomena.

                                                                                          Thanks,            Ted

                                                                                                     
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 08, 2010, 04:50:27 AM
Since joining the DRT forum, i have finally had a chance to read most of the Topics and Posts. I have had a chance to relate the story of my sighting in as much detail as i am at liberty to discuss due to the nature of the work i do. I know there is still much that i cannot discuss that might prove valuable in solving this mystery, but it is something that i have to take particular caution to due to the sensitive nature of my profession. The one thing i have not yet discussed is the possibility of making contact with other witnesses and individuals involved in this issue for the purpose of comparing our experiences and asking these individuals to come forward with their stories and information. I made the decision to come forward and discuss my experience after much thought and hesitation. But i felt that it was important to at least give what information i could to help in finding an answer to this mystery.I know now it was the RIGHT thing to do. I would like to encourage any other witnesses or individuals with information on these Drone Craft to come forward and participate in this forum or at least contact me by message and relate your experience or just have a casual conversation in regards to this issue. I thank the DRT forum and members for their interest and the questions asked. I think that the answer can be found and i encourage everyone to keep looking, just as i plan to continue for as long as it takes.

                                                                                                       Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on June 08, 2010, 06:37:31 AM
Well done Ted , bravo ! I hope this will  help those too shy to speak ...
Regards.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 08, 2010, 07:22:35 PM
I was just re-reading Issac's material and I spotted this;
"I am also trying to get in touch with the witnesses so far, such as Chad, Rajman, Jenna, Ty, and the Lake Tahoe witness (especially Chad). I have advice for them that may be somewhat helpful in dealing with what they've seen and what I would recommend they do with what they know. If you are one of these witnesses, or can put me in touch with them, please contact Coast to Coast AM and let them know."

It seems Issac wanted to reach out to the witnesses all of the ones listed above have never been found, but here we have Ted whom has come forward. Ted has Linda ever tried to put you in touch with Issac?

And maybe you should try through Coast to Coast to get his e-mail of start a dialog through them.

BTW does anyone know if Linda still has a working contact with Issac? or has he gone dark permanently. I know she has not said much other than his few email responses, but obviously she has his email and I wonder if it is still working.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 08, 2010, 09:55:02 PM
BTW does anyone know if Linda still has a working contact with Issac? or has he gone dark permanently. I know she has not said much other than his few email responses, but obviously she has his email and I wonder if it is still working.

I am quite sure that she does not have contact with Isaac anymore. Apparently emails to him went unanswered sometime in 2007.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 08, 2010, 11:22:30 PM
I was just re-reading Issac's material and I spotted this;
"I am also trying to get in touch with the witnesses so far, such as Chad, Rajman, Jenna, Ty, and the Lake Tahoe witness (especially Chad). I have advice for them that may be somewhat helpful in dealing with what they've seen and what I would recommend they do with what they know. If you are one of these witnesses, or can put me in touch with them, please contact Coast to Coast AM and let them know."

It seems Issac wanted to reach out to the witnesses all of the ones listed above have never been found, but here we have Ted whom has come forward. Ted has Linda ever tried to put you in touch with Issac?

And maybe you should try through Coast to Coast to get his e-mail of start a dialog through them.

BTW does anyone know if Linda still has a working contact with Issac? or has he gone dark permanently. I know she has not said much other than his few email responses, but obviously she has his email and I wonder if it is still working.


Linda Howe had contact with some of these witness....so she was able to find them or they found her.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 08, 2010, 11:29:16 PM
BTW does anyone know if Linda still has a working contact with Issac? or has he gone dark permanently. I know she has not said much other than his few email responses, but obviously she has his email and I wonder if it is still working.
I am quite sure that she does not have contact with Isaac anymore. Apparently emails to him went unanswered sometime in 2007.

Hi Anthony:
Are you 100% sure Linda has lost touch with Isaac?  I don't remember reading or hearing anything definitive on this....but it may well be true.

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 09, 2010, 12:49:12 AM
Are you 100% sure Linda has lost touch with Isaac?  I don't remember reading or hearing anything definitive on this....but it may well be true.

While I cannot be 100% sure, I had emails with her this year, and she did mention that she no longer has contact with Isaac.

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 09, 2010, 01:05:42 AM
Thanks, guerande. I do hope these folks will consider contributing to the search for an answer to the Drone Craft Mystery.  I realize that there are those out there intent on perpetuating a hoax and creating CGI and Photoshop images and other documents to confuse and confound the serious researchers, but i also believe there are the people out there who, like myself, have had a real encounter with these craft and have photos, documentation, and witness testimony and refused to come forward for fear of ridicule or of being identified. As for myself, all i have is my testimony and the desire to find out what i witnessed on that morning in 2007.

                                                                                                      Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 09, 2010, 01:18:38 AM
Hi OTF,

I will contact Linda this week and see if she can give any further info on the witnesses or if she has contact with any other than myself. I will advise.

                                                                                                                  Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 09, 2010, 01:25:34 AM
Linda made me aware of these other witnesses and the CARET documents at the time of my sighting, but never discussed me getting in touch with any of them. I know from my own contact with Linda that she is very respectful of ones privacy an will not divulge information without consent. For this reason i have trusted her with my information and she has always respected my wishes in respect to any information i give her.

                                                                                                                 Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 09, 2010, 05:16:59 AM
Maybe Linda could send an email (if the issac emails are not getting bounced back maybe he is simply not responding, incapable or does not use that email anymore. Let's see if we can determine which it is) and post on her Earthfiles site and the Team leaders post here Ted's willingness to take Issac up on his offer for contact.

I think it important to politely remind Issac it was he who offered to reach out to the witnesses of which Ted is one.

Maybe he will read this and take Ted up on starting a dialog.

It's a longshot but we've got to keep punching and eventually we might hit something.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 09, 2010, 01:34:21 PM
Maybe Linda could send an email (if the issac emails are not getting bounced back maybe he is simply not responding, incapable or does not use that email anymore. Let's see if we can determine which it is) and post on her Earthfiles site and the Team leaders post here Ted's willingness to take Issac up on his offer for contact.

I think it important to politely remind Issac it was he who offered to reach out to the witnesses of which Ted is one.

Maybe he will read this and take Ted up on starting a dialog.

It's a longshot but we've got to keep punching and eventually we might hit something.

I am assured that Linda is doing all she can to contact witnesses and Isaac. She may be publicly silent on this, but has not dropped the case.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 09, 2010, 03:04:35 PM
That's what happens when you put someone in charge of the evidence that has a personal agenda. Linda has been holding info that she was given to share not to profit from.

Three years later and she still does not share all the Hires pictures and I'm sure that's not all she is holding back as well.

I'd like to hear an explanation from her as to why she is doing this. The release of the rest of this material might blow the whole case wide open. Instead she tires to connect it to her Cattle Mutilation theories. It seems anything she reports on concerning UFOS comes full circle back to here Cattle Mutilation theory.

Not that I don't think Cattle Mutilations are connected with UFO's I just don't think they are connected with the Drones.

Three Years enough is enough. We have to assume since Issac is not responding he is gone for good and other avenues have to be explored the main one being Linda's Hi rez pics.

On the fence, since you have a line of communication open with her is she explaining why she is not sharing the other Hi Rez pictures?

If she was to say I'm writing a book and it will be published 2011 then I will release the pictures or something to that effect then I would not mind but here silence here betrays the public to whom she was tasked to share this info with.

I'm going to go have a burger now ::)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 09, 2010, 05:21:49 PM
That's what happens when you put someone in charge of the evidence that has a personal agenda. Linda has been holding info that she was given to share not to profit from.

Three years later and she still does not share all the Hires pictures and I'm sure that's not all she is holding back as well.

I'd like to hear an explanation from her as to why she is doing this. The release of the rest of this material might blow the whole case wide open. Instead she tires to connect it to her Cattle Mutilation theories. It seems anything she reports on concerning UFOS comes full circle back to here Cattle Mutilation theory.

Not that I don't think Cattle Mutilations are connected with UFO's I just don't think they are connected with the Drones.

Three Years enough is enough. We have to assume since Issac is not responding he is gone for good and other avenues have to be explored the main one being Linda's Hi rez pics.

On the fence, since you have a line of communication open with her is she explaining why she is not sharing the other Hi Rez pictures?

If she was to say I'm writing a book and it will be published 2011 then I will release the pictures or something to that effect then I would not mind but here silence here betrays the public to whom she was tasked to share this info with.

I'm going to go have a burger now ::)


I know it is difficult to deal with. I see the main issue with your post is that she has kept the Ty hi-res images. Her continuing stance on that was as it was from the beginning.  My best understanding is that she is keeping them to know new images from fakes. Whether we can understand it or not, I think we will have to accept it. In fact, it Ty wanted us to see his hi-res images, he could easily contact many other people to do that now.

As far as any other info that she might have, I am quite sure that she would have to keep that private as part of protecting witnesses.

I am not her direct contact, she does accept emails from others as before. I would like to urge people to not fly off the handle in the name of DRT as was done here last year by someone else. Linda is genuinely concerned to help investigate this case, and is bound by some confidentiality agreements she made with witnesses. It would be quite unprofessional to release their identities.

I think that the only reason people are theorizing about other possibilities is because there is not enough wick to light the bomb that would blow this case wide open. Even I have no shortage of theories, LOL. Hopefully the drones will appear again like they did in 2007 so we all have more clues to follow.

I hope you enjoyed your burger :)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 09, 2010, 10:45:17 PM
Quote
That's what happens when you put someone in charge of the evidence that has a personal agenda. Linda has been holding info that she was given to share not to profit from.


Linda has her reasons to withold information, and she has the right to do so, as she has promised the witnesses total anonymous stance when the witnesses approached her, ask Ted how he was treated by Linda...I'm sure he was given the choise to either stand forward, or to remain anonymous. I'm sure Ted chose the latter for himself. Please correct me if I'm wrong, Ted!

EVS

 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 09, 2010, 11:50:19 PM
Roger That, EVS

                                                                        Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 10, 2010, 12:28:17 AM
I contacted Linda Moulton Howe last evening by email with the following request:

Hi Linda;
> > Hope all is well. I have a question in regards to Drone Craft Witnesses. I was wondering if you still have contact with any of the Drone Witnesses, other than myself? If so, do you think it would be possible for me to get in contact with any of them on a one to one basis for the purpose of sharing information? I realize that their true identity, as is mine, is a secret and i know on behalf of all of us i thank you for keeping our identities and information safe. This is an issue we never really spoke about, but was just wondering if any of the witnesses had approached you in regards to this idea? I feel that this might go a long way to resolving this mystery if there was a way to make contact with each other while still maintaining our privacy

I received a reply from her shortly thereafter that she would put together a list of Witnesses and contact information and forward that along with background info on the case of witness that might be helpful in understanding their sightings in more detail before i initiate contact with them.

 I think, with Linda's help we can contact some of the witnesses and
possibly convince them that it would be possible to discuss and compare
information in private between just ourselves at first, it might be possible
to convince them to participate in the DRT forum at some point. And if not,
then the private discussions alone will still be a valuable tool for all of
us to further understand and share our experiences. As always Linda was
quick to respond to my request and i am sure she will do as much as she can
to provide contact information. This is just another avenue to explore in
the search. I am convinced that an answer can be found if we turn over
enough rocks!! lol :

To All, please understand that the contact information is being given to me in confidence. I will not divulge the true identity, personal contact information, or any other facts that might jeopardize the true identity, profession, addresses, locations or any other information that each individual witness does no wish to reveal.

                                                                                                   Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 10, 2010, 12:34:37 AM
Great work, Ted, and great thinking! Thank you for doing this!

I'm sure some new evidence might spawn from this!

Thanks,

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 10, 2010, 12:36:48 AM
Thanks, you are welcome.

                                                                         Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 10, 2010, 12:51:41 AM
Thanks, OTF. I echo that sentiment and add that if we all pull together i believe we can find the answer!!!


                                                                                                           Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 10, 2010, 01:55:56 AM
Let us keep in mind that Linda has released all of the photos she has.  She has not withheld any photos of Drones.

The one photo that we refer to as the 'Hi-Res" photo is one that was scanned on her personal scanner from one of the original small photos mailed to her [I believe these photos are about 4 X 5]. That act merely converted the resolution pixels for that one photo.  That became the famous "Hi-Res" photo.

We still have all the other photos of that series.

Maybe someone can increase the pixels for the remaining photos of that series.  All of these photos are stored on this website.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 10, 2010, 02:00:03 AM
Let us keep in mind that Linda has released all of the photos she has.  She has not withheld any photos of Drones.

The one photo that we refer to as the 'Hi-Res" photo is one that she scanned on her personal scanner from one of the original small photos mailed to her. That act merely converted the resolution pixels for that one photo.  That became the famous "Hi-Res" photo.

We still have all the other photos of that series.

Yes, we have them in "Low-Res"-- Douglas...Linda holds all of them, just like the one (1) we have. She only scanned in one in "Hi-res". What we would like her to do, is to scan the remaining photo's in "Hi-Res", just like the one we already got!

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 10, 2010, 02:06:09 AM
Let us keep in mind that Linda has released all of the photos she has.  She has not withheld any photos of Drones.

The one photo that we refer to as the 'Hi-Res" photo is one that she scanned on her personal scanner from one of the original small photos mailed to her. That act merely converted the resolution pixels for that one photo.  That became the famous "Hi-Res" photo.

We still have all the other photos of that series.

Yes, we have them in "Low-Res"-- Douglas...Linda holds all of them in "High-Res", just like the one (1) we have.

EVS

No, she only holds the original 4 x 5 glossy print photos.  She does not hold any more hi res photos. She only scanned one photo and posted it on the internet.  [Her assistant only scanned one of the 4 x 5 glossy photos.] I copied it and reposted it on another website.

Why doesn't someone take the remaining photos, that are stored on this website, and increase the pixels?  It would amount to almost the same results.  Does anyone have that skill?  Just asking.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 10, 2010, 02:12:33 AM
Yes, Douglas, Linda has the glossy photo's, of which we now own 1 in hi-res scan! What we'd like is the other ones to be scanned in the same way! Pixelation prohibits detail, unless the photo's are scanned in the same way as the one we already got!

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 10, 2010, 02:14:19 AM
Let us keep in mind that Linda has released all of the photos she has.  She has not withheld any photos of Drones.

The one photo that we refer to as the 'Hi-Res" photo is one that she scanned on her personal scanner from one of the original small photos mailed to her. That act merely converted the resolution pixels for that one photo.  That became the famous "Hi-Res" photo.

We still have all the other photos of that series.

Yes, we have them in "Low-Res"-- Douglas...Linda holds all of them, just like the one (1) we have. She only scanned in one in "Hi-res". What we would like her to do, is to scan the remaining photo's in "Hi-Res", just like the one we already got!

EVS

I understand what you are saying about pixelation .  Let me use my low tech photo software to see if I can create a hi res photo from one of the remaining of this set.  I do not have Photo Shop but I will try.  Maybe it won't work but I will see.

Anyone with PhotoShop or some other photo software could do the same if they are inclined to.

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 10, 2010, 02:31:44 AM
Let us keep in mind that Linda has released all of the photos she has.  She has not withheld any photos of Drones.

The one photo that we refer to as the 'Hi-Res" photo is one that she scanned on her personal scanner from one of the original small photos mailed to her. That act merely converted the resolution pixels for that one photo.  That became the famous "Hi-Res" photo.

We still have all the other photos of that series.

Yes, we have them in "Low-Res"-- Douglas...Linda holds all of them, just like the one (1) we have. She only scanned in one in "Hi-res". What we would like her to do, is to scan the remaining photo's in "Hi-Res", just like the one we already got!

EVS

I understand what you are saying about pixelation .  Let me use my low tech photo software to see if I can create a hi res photo from one of the remaining of this set.  I do not have Photo Shop but I will try.  Maybe it won't work but I will see.

Anyone with PhotoShop or some other photo software could do the same if they are inclined to.

Douglas

It simply can't be done, Douglas.
EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 10, 2010, 03:40:07 AM

It simply can't be done, Douglas.
EVS

__________________________________________
I agree. EVS.  Not enough data in the small photos.

 So far, nothing has worked with LMH to encourage her to scan some more of those photos and send them to us.   Even one more would be good.

We even tried being nice and that didn't work.

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 10, 2010, 03:55:12 AM
Let's see what Ted might accomplish. Linda actually isn't that hard to bargain with. If only the right way is found to approach her, a gem might fall off in the doing.  ;)

Politeness sometimes brings rewards in itself.

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 10, 2010, 06:09:21 AM
Ted sounds like you took my Issac idea and substituted yourself. Good thinking. Maybe you could convince her (Linda) to rescan the photos in hi rez.

There's lots of ways Linda could get the witnesses to cross communicate; a private web group, teleconferencing just off the top of my head. Maybe it could eventually lead to a group teleconference on Coast to Coast, or a re interviewing on Coast to Coast, that might interest Issac to pop back out of the woodwork if he can.

Lets hope Issac is reading or listening.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 10, 2010, 08:26:56 AM
Ted sounds like you took my Issac idea and substituted yourself. Good thinking. Maybe you could convince her to rescan the photos in hi rez.

There's lots of ways Linda could get the witnesses to cross communicate; a private web group, teleconferencing just off the top of my head. Maybe it could eventually lead to a group teleconference on Coast to Coast, or a re interviewing on Coast to Coast, that might interest Issac to pop back out of the woodwork if he can.

Lets hope Issac is reading or listening.

As we remember from 2007, Isaac agreed to go live with Linda on Coast 2 Coast at a certain time one evening.  She came on live and Isaac never showed up as he had promised her in a telephone conversation with him earlier that same day.  I got the feeling from that episode that Isaac had serious second thoughts about going on worldwide radio to discuss  something that he said was classified US Government - Top Secret.

Isaac seemed to infer that he would write a book or release more of his 500 pages of purloined documents.  I suspect the more he thought about it, the more scary it became in his mind.

Isaac is a hero for revealing parts one of the greatest mysteries of the century. 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 10, 2010, 02:16:40 PM
I seriously think Issac was spooked or made to disappear (I sincerely hope not) here was someone very willing to share then suddenly poof gone.

If he was spooked lets hope somehow he gets the info out in a safer way for himself/herself (wouldn't it be funny if Issac was female).

Moving on from there and assuming no further info is going to come from Issac all we have left are Linda's photos that maybe she can be convinced to scan in hirez and the witnesses.

If some of the witnesses talk to each other who knows maybe something might come of it.

If Linda shares Hi Rez scans definitely something would come of it and the case would be advanced further.

Even if she simply scans a few more and not all of them in Hi Rez I think it would advance the case significantly. In there they may be details that can take this case to a whole new level.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 11, 2010, 03:19:20 AM
Ted sounds like you took my Issac idea and substituted yourself. Good thinking. Maybe you could convince her (Linda) to rescan the photos in hi rez.

There's lots of ways Linda could get the witnesses to cross communicate; a private web group, teleconferencing just off the top of my head. Maybe it could eventually lead to a group teleconference on Coast to Coast, or a re interviewing on Coast to Coast, that might interest Issac to pop back out of the woodwork if he can.

Lets hope Issac is reading or listening.
Thanks, Just seemed to me a good way to get the ball rolling again on this issue and would also go a long way to helping me understand my sighting.

                                                Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 11, 2010, 03:30:07 AM
I seriously think Issac was spooked or made to disappear (I sincerely hope not) here was someone very willing to share then suddenly poof gone.

If he was spooked lets hope somehow he gets the info out in a safer way for himself/herself (wouldn't it be funny if Issac was female).

Moving on from there and assuming no further info is going to come from Issac all we have left are Linda's photos that maybe she can be convinced to scan in hirez and the witnesses.

If some of the witnesses talk to each other who knows maybe something might come of it.

If Linda shares Hi Rez scans definitely something would come of it and the case would be advanced further.

Even if she simply scans a few more and not all of them in Hi Rez I think it would advance the case significantly. In there they may be details that can take this case to a whole new level.
Since i was not involved in the original conversations and the situation with the Hi Rez photos. I will approach Linda in regards to the possibility of releasing these photos if everyone here on the forum is in agreement. I wasn't sure about all the events that lead up to this problem and was hesitant about getting involved due to my lack of knowledge of the original facts of what happened. I think i might have some leverage in convincing her to consider this, but i just don't want to stir a "Hornets Nest" that i don't know a lot about. Linda and i have developed a good relationship over the past 3 years and i value her friendship and her insight.

                                                       Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on June 11, 2010, 06:10:22 AM
I seriously think Issac was spooked or made to disappear (I sincerely hope not) here was someone very willing to share then suddenly poof gone.

If he was spooked lets hope somehow he gets the info out in a safer way for himself/herself (wouldn't it be funny if Issac was female).

Moving on from there and assuming no further info is going to come from Issac all we have left are Linda's photos that maybe she can be convinced to scan in hirez and the witnesses.

If some of the witnesses talk to each other who knows maybe something might come of it.

If Linda shares Hi Rez scans definitely something would come of it and the case would be advanced further.

Even if she simply scans a few more and not all of them in Hi Rez I think it would advance the case significantly. In there they may be details that can take this case to a whole new level.
Since i was not involved in the original conversations and the situation with the Hi Rez photos. I will approach Linda in regards to the possibility of releasing these photos if everyone here on the forum is in agreement. I wasn't sure about all the events that lead up to this problem and was hesitant about getting involved due to my lack of knowledge of the original facts of what happened. I think i might have some leverage in convincing her to consider this, but i just don't want to stir a "Hornets Nest" that i don't know a lot about. Linda and i have developed a good relationship over the past 3 years and i value her friendship and her insight.

                                                       Thanks, Ted

The whole situation is very simple, Ted.

Several members have requested that Linda have her assistant scan in Hi Res some more of the Ty Big Basin photos that he sent her and post them to this site.  Even one more, that shows to opposite side of the craft, would be welcome.

So far she has declined.  Why?  No one knows.

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on June 11, 2010, 07:30:52 PM
Hey Ted I jut came across some interesting videos that were shot with night vision. It seems the infra red on the cameras picked up stuff the human eye could not.

UFO AND TRIANGLES NIGHT VISION (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62dctBFgJ7I#)

UFO Shoots Laser Beam October 10-2009-PA Contributer/Filmer/Friend Alison Kruse (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnsta0cwZqQ&#ws)

I thought this was of interest since there was a lot of bak and forth about the cameras at your work and the various levels, etc.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 11, 2010, 11:25:40 PM
Hey Ted I jut came across some interesting videos that were shot with night vision. It seems the infra red on the cameras picked up stuff the human eye could not.

UFO AND TRIANGLES NIGHT VISION (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62dctBFgJ7I#)

UFO Shoots Laser Beam October 10-2009-PA Contributer/Filmer/Friend Alison Kruse (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnsta0cwZqQ&#ws)

I thought this was of interest since there was a lot of bak and forth about the cameras at your work and the various levels, etc.
Thanks danblast. This is very interesting stuff!! I wonder what level or generation it is?? But one thing is for sure, it is recorded. sure wish mine had been!!!!!!!

                                                          Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 11, 2010, 11:40:40 PM
I seriously think Issac was spooked or made to disappear (I sincerely hope not) here was someone very willing to share then suddenly poof gone.

If he was spooked lets hope somehow he gets the info out in a safer way for himself/herself (wouldn't it be funny if Issac was female).

Moving on from there and assuming no further info is going to come from Issac all we have left are Linda's photos that maybe she can be convinced to scan in hirez and the witnesses.

If some of the witnesses talk to each other who knows maybe something might come of it.

If Linda shares Hi Rez scans definitely something would come of it and the case would be advanced further.

Even if she simply scans a few more and not all of them in Hi Rez I think it would advance the case significantly. In there they may be details that can take this case to a whole new level.
Since i was not involved in the original conversations and the situation with the Hi Rez photos. I will approach Linda in regards to the possibility of releasing these photos if everyone here on the forum is in agreement. I wasn't sure about all the events that lead up to this problem and was hesitant about getting involved due to my lack of knowledge of the original facts of what happened. I think i might have some leverage in convincing her to consider this, but i just don't want to stir a "Hornets Nest" that i don't know a lot about. Linda and i have developed a good relationship over the past 3 years and i value her friendship and her insight.

                                                       Thanks, Ted

The whole situation is very simple, Ted.

Several members have requested that Linda have her assistant scan in Hi Res some more of the Ty Big Basin photos that he sent her and post them to this site.  Even one more, that shows to opposite side of the craft, would be welcome.

So far she has declined.  Why?  No one knows.

Douglas
Thanks Douglas. I appreciate the background info. I will do what i can to find out about this from LMH. As i said before, Linda has been very helpful and supportive to me throughout this whole ordeal. I don't want to jepordise that trust we have, but i will question her on this issue at some point and see what response i get. Understand i can't push this issue if it means risking this relationship in regards to my own sighting and experience. I will try to get an answer.

                                                          Thanks,  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 03:18:53 AM
The â??ANSWERâ?!! It was right there all the time!!
(1)
For the last 3 ½ years I have been searching for the answer to the EXISTANCE, the ORIGIN, and the PURPOSE of the Drone Craft I encountered. I have pondered, wondered, and worried over this phenomenon since my sighting, I have researched, networked and discussed  this event over and over with no real answers. A few days ago I decided to take a simple and direct approach. To return to the exact location of my experience at the same time of the morning and see if anything would happen. This morning 10/06/2010 at 05:15, I returned to the site. The following is a detailed report of what happened.

At 05:15 this morning I returned to the site of my experience with the Drone Craft in 2007. I sat near the location of where the tree had been during my original sighting. The tree is no longer there as it fell during a storm in the summer of 2010. The stump was removed a week after the tree fell. As I sat there, I began to verbally ask the following questions. â?? I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? WHO ARE YOU? WHAT IS YOUR PURPOSE? WHERE ARE YOU FROM? IS THE DRONE YOURS OR OURS? CAN YOU GIVE ME ANSWERS?
There was no immediate response. I sat for a few minutes longer. I decided to get up and leave. As I began to rise, I felt a surge of what felt like electrical current surge through every part of my body. At the same instant I received what I can only describe as a telepathic message clear and explicit with the following message. (Quoted)
â??WE ARE OF OLTISSISâ?. â??  â?? THE 23rd PLANET IN OUR SYSTEMâ?  â?? THE VESSEL IS OF OUR ORIGINâ? â??WHAT DO YOU SEEKâ? ?
My reply was tell me all you can so I can understand.

(Okay, at this point I am totally freaked out!!!!)
The information begins to roll into my thoughts as if it is being downloaded from a computer.
Here is everything I remember given in telepathic message.

The Vessel is an information probe that enables us to understand your environment. Our native environment is unlike yours, so we wish to learn so that we might be able to function in your environment. We are able to create a TEAR in what you perceive as Time and Space in order to travel great distances for our research. We repair the tear when we return to our own planet.

Our Planet is smaller than EARTH and has 4 of your MOONS. Two of these moons we inhabit. One of these is for QUARENTINE of those of  our world who are ill or injured. It is necessary that those be separated from the rest of our world until healed. The other MOON is for production of the CRYSTALS that provide our power and propulsion for our vessels. The Production of the CRYSTALS is a highly volatile and dangerous procedure that could harm our environment.

Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

The VESSEL creates communications points at the locations where we make contact with your species . These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

At the given time, we will initiate contact with your species. There is much to prepare before any contact with your world. We have observed your world evolve and there is still much that could be harmful to our world through contact with your world. Your world could not understand our physical or mental forms at this time, or the means by which we are able to traverse â??ETHOSâ?.
     
The â??ANSWERâ?
(2)

Our Traverse's are possible due to the absence of what your world is limited to by the presence of a Physical form. Our existence is of the PROCESS and not the FORM.

Some of our species have been lost during our research and their PROCESS ended due to interaction with your world. Your world is warned to respect, protect, and nourish the PROCESS.

We value all PROCESS of our species and find it the most important element of existence.

We have watched you and researched your worlds attempts to traverse  â??ETHOSâ?

We have many different VESSELS  designed for specific research of the worlds of our research.

We find your world interesting for the structure of so many elements.
Our world is devoid of these elements as they are not necessary for the existence of our PROCESS.
 
Our VESSELS travel at will and initiate contact with yours and other species as needed for our research.

Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?
â??WE ARE OLTISSIS OF ETHOSâ?

(End of message)


 
The ANSWER I have pursued has been given.
I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors
10/06/2010




 


Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on October 07, 2010, 03:37:17 AM
Thank you Ted for sharing your experience with us here!

I hope that anyone else with similar expereinces or knowledge of the context may recognize something in there.

Also, I am sure there are more questions that others may think of to pose to you. Hopefully you have more contact in the future and those questions can be asked.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 03:53:12 AM
Thank you Ted for sharing your experience with us here!

I hope that anyone else with similar expereinces or knowledge of the context may recognize something in there.

Also, I am sure there are more questions that others may think of to pose to you. Hopefully you have more contact in the future and those questions can be asked.
Thanks OTF. I am still digesting all the information and i ask that everyone be patient and i will answer their questions as soon as i can. I realize that all this seems like some kind of joke or hoax, but let me assure everyone that it could have not been more real to me! I still have not calmed down, but wanted to document all this while it was still fresh in my mind. the term "Freaked Out" is an understatement. My mind has been reeling ever since this happened. I know some will scoff at this and others will just laugh, but I HAVE MY ANSWER and that has always been my goal!!!   
                                                                               Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 07, 2010, 05:02:52 AM
Thank you Ted for sharing your experience with us here!

I hope that anyone else with similar expereinces or knowledge of the context may recognize something in there.

Also, I am sure there are more questions that others may think of to pose to you. Hopefully you have more contact in the future and those questions can be asked.
Thanks OTF. I am still digesting all the information and i ask that everyone be patient and i will answer their questions as soon as i can. I realize that all this seems like some kind of joke or hoax, but let me assure everyone that it could have not been more real to me! I still have not calmed down, but wanted to document all this while it was still fresh in my mind. the term "Freaked Out" is an understatement. My mind has been reeling ever since this happened. I know some will scoff at this and others will just laugh, but I HAVE MY ANSWER and that has always been my goal!!!   
                                                                               Thanks, Ted



Hi Ted:

You did the exact correct thing to get your answer from one of the Elder races that is watching our planet.  They are aware of your location and they probably even know your address.  Don't worry, they're very kind and loving.  They've been watching our planet for well over two thousand years.  They know our complete history, warts and all.

Yes, your contact sounds 100% spot on.  You also did right by going to near the place you first saw their probe.  You read my posts about one of the space explorers craft and how they operate and I did reference the book where I got some of my information about this race of space dwellers. It is the second part of the book "The White Sands Incident" by Dr. Daniel Fry.  That is 93 pages called "An Extraterrestrial Statement" by Rolf Telano...it may be online now.  I did not check today....  There are several races monitoring this planet.  You may have seen a probe from a different race than the one in that book.  That may account for the different craft we see.

Your feeling the "electric" like charge go through you is how they communicate to a human being.  I've had it happen to me and it can really stun you at first but no real harm was done to you. [My contact was with the spirit entities that hover over this planet but it was somewhat similar to yours.]

Congratulations you are now a more or less direct 'contactee' with our brothers in space.  I suspect you can get in contact with them again if they feel you are sincere and not out to exploit them in some unethical manner and if you want to.  They are very mentally telepathic and they know your heart.....believe it!

You might be able to contact them at when you are at home at a quiet time.  They know your mental wave length and can now contact you at their discretion.

Write down all their communication carefully.  Maybe ask them the shape and size of their probe and how their probe is powered. I would be curious about their home planet and their current way of life.  "The Urantia Book" talks about these things and you might want to check it out.

To these races the speed of light means nothing.  They travel faster than light in a different dimension of time and space that we have yet to discover.

I am wondering from what they said to you that their ultimate intention is to live on this planet.  After all, how long do they need to assay this planet and environment to know if it is suitable for their habitation??  There is been a lot of talk recently that a race of space dwellers desire to live with us on this planet.   

If they have an entire moon that is a quarantine and medical facility it could be that they have some serious issues with their current environment.

 There are actual architectural quarantine planets in space but they are usually detention planets for personalities that defy God and His universe plans.  I know this sounds like Star Wars but it's a fact from my studies and experiences.

Feel welcome to post more of your experience and you never know what may happen next in your  adventure with this race of space travelers that you have tried to be friends with.

Good luck,
Douglas


Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on October 07, 2010, 05:49:36 AM
Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

...I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors

I have touched the face of God yet will never make a claim to be more enlightened or greater than another being. Our collective knowledge prospers with the tide of thought and effort evolving over time but insight ... that comes only from within.

I am.

Unfortunately 'Ted' you waited a long time to reveal your game but stumbled in its execution.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 03:27:20 PM
I returned to the same location at the same time this morning to see if could make contact again. I spent well over an hour verbally asking the same questions i asked yesterday along with several i had not asked. There was no response and no feeling as i felt yesterday and no telepathic message delivered. I will continue to try for the next few days and post any results here. Honestly, i had trouble getting the courage to do this again, but i feel it is still important and yes there are many more questions unanswered. But i know in the case of my experience at least that the Drone Craft that i witnessed is THEIRS and not OURS. In that, i stand firm on my comment that " I COULD NOT ASK FOR MORE".  I would ask that any of the "WITNESSES" out there attempt the same procedure and return to the point of your experience and try to make contact. This may be the "DOOR" that leads to the knowledge that we ALL have been searching for. After my experience in 2007 i have made it very clear time and again that the only things i wanted to know about all this is WHO is responsible?, WHAT is the purpose?, and  WHY this is happening? , For my own personal peace of mind.  I thought that after yesterday i would have no more questions in my mind about all this. But after 24 hours of thinking and reliving the whole experience i find myself with more questions than ever. I will post these soon and see if anyone here wants to pursue the answers or has any ideas or suggestions in regards to these unanswered questions. As for myself, i am content for the moment with the knowledge i have been given as to WHO, WHAT, & WHY.

                                                                                      Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 03:31:43 PM
Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

...I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors

I have touched the face of God yet will never make a claim to be more enlightened or greater than another being. Our collective knowledge prospers with the tide of thought and effort evolving over time but insight ... that comes only from within.

I am.

Unfortunately 'Ted' you waited a long time to reveal your game but stumbled in its execution.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.
There is no game please read my last entry. And yes everyone is free to believe what they will. Thanks for the response.     
                                                                           Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 03:37:42 PM
Thank you Ted for sharing your experience with us here!

I hope that anyone else with similar expereinces or knowledge of the context may recognize something in there.

Also, I am sure there are more questions that others may think of to pose to you. Hopefully you have more contact in the future and those questions can be asked.
Thanks OTF. I am still digesting all the information and i ask that everyone be patient and i will answer their questions as soon as i can. I realize that all this seems like some kind of joke or hoax, but let me assure everyone that it could have not been more real to me! I still have not calmed down, but wanted to document all this while it was still fresh in my mind. the term "Freaked Out" is an understatement. My mind has been reeling ever since this happened. I know some will scoff at this and others will just laugh, but I HAVE MY ANSWER and that has always been my goal!!!   
                                                                               Thanks, Ted



Hi Ted:

You did the exact correct thing to get your answer from one of the Elder races that is watching our planet.  They are aware of your location and they probably even know your address.  Don't worry, they're very kind and loving.  They've been watching our planet for well over two thousand years.  They know our complete history, warts and all.

Yes, your contact sounds 100% spot on.  You also did right by going to near the place you first saw their probe.  You read my posts about one of the space explorers craft and how they operate and I did reference the book where I got some of my information about this race of space dwellers. It is the second part of the book "The White Sands Incident" by Dr. Daniel Fry.  That is 93 pages called "An Extraterrestrial Statement" by Rolf Telano...it may be online now.  I did not check today....  There are several races monitoring this planet.  You may have seen a probe from a different race than the one in that book.  That may account for the different craft we see.

Your feeling the "electric" like charge go through you is how they communicate to a human being.  I've had it happen to me and it can really stun you at first but no real harm was done to you. [My contact was with the spirit entities that hover over this planet but it was somewhat similar to yours.]

Congratulations you are now a more or less direct 'contactee' with our brothers in space.  I suspect you can get in contact with them again if they feel you are sincere and not out to exploit them in some unethical manner and if you want to.  They are very mentally telepathic and they know your heart.....believe it!

You might be able to contact them at when you are at home at a quiet time.  They know your mental wave length and can now contact you at their discretion.

Write down all their communication carefully.  Maybe ask them the shape and size of their probe and how their probe is powered. I would be curious about their home planet and their current way of life.  "The Urantia Book" talks about these things and you might want to check it out.

To these races the speed of light means nothing.  They travel faster than light in a different dimension of time and space that we have yet to discover.

I am wondering from what they said to you that their ultimate intention is to live on this planet.  After all, how long do they need to assay this planet and environment to know if it is suitable for their habitation??  There is been a lot of talk recently that a race of space dwellers desire to live with us on this planet.   

If they have an entire moon that is a quarantine and medical facility it could be that they have some serious issues with their current environment.

 There are actual architectural quarantine planets in space but they are usually detention planets for personalities that defy God and His universe plans.  I know this sounds like Star Wars but it's a fact from my studies and experiences.

Feel welcome to post more of your experience and you never know what may happen next in your  adventure with this race of space travelers that you have tried to be friends with.

Good luck,
Douglas


Thanks Douglas for your response, your comments and your support. They are very helpful in understanding this experience and reinforcing my thoughts on all this.

                                                                                             Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 07, 2010, 05:50:02 PM

I am.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.

I am:

http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_verbs_sum.htm (http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_verbs_sum.htm)


Sure there's more questions to ask...

If Ted is in the belief that he has recieved information about the "Drones", even though it's through telepathy or any
other means, it sure beats what else has come forward here for some time.

So if Ted has anything to share here, it can only be to our benefit...

Let's set aside our prejudice for a short while, if that is what's the question here..

Please continue, Ted!

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on October 07, 2010, 08:19:51 PM


 
Let's set aside our prejudice for a short while, if that is what's the question here...

Well said !

I'm very curious of what"s going to go ...

Ted : try again - who know ?

and tks to share .
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 11:04:54 PM
The â??ANSWERâ?!! It was right there all the time!!
(1)
For the last 3 ½ years I have been searching for the answer to the EXISTANCE, the ORIGIN, and the PURPOSE of the Drone Craft I encountered. I have pondered, wondered, and worried over this phenomenon since my sighting, I have researched, networked and discussed  this event over and over with no real answers. A few days ago I decided to take a simple and direct approach. To return to the exact location of my experience at the same time of the morning and see if anything would happen. This morning 10/06/2010 at 05:15, I returned to the site. The following is a detailed report of what happened.

At 05:15 this morning I returned to the site of my experience with the Drone Craft in 2007. I sat near the location of where the tree had been during my original sighting. The tree is no longer there as it fell during a storm in the summer of 2010. The stump was removed a week after the tree fell. As I sat there, I began to verbally ask the following questions. â?? I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? WHO ARE YOU? WHAT IS YOUR PURPOSE? WHERE ARE YOU FROM? IS THE DRONE YOURS OR OURS? CAN YOU GIVE ME ANSWERS?
There was no immediate response. I sat for a few minutes longer. I decided to get up and leave. As I began to rise, I felt a surge of what felt like electrical current surge through every part of my body. At the same instant I received what I can only describe as a telepathic message clear and explicit with the following message. (Quoted)
â??WE ARE OF OLTISSISâ?. â??  â?? THE 23rd PLANET IN OUR SYSTEMâ?  â?? THE VESSEL IS OF OUR ORIGINâ? â??WHAT DO YOU SEEKâ? ?
My reply was tell me all you can so I can understand.

(Okay, at this point I am totally freaked out!!!!)
The information begins to roll into my thoughts as if it is being downloaded from a computer.
Here is everything I remember given in telepathic message.

The Vessel is an information probe that enables us to understand your environment. Our native environment is unlike yours, so we wish to learn so that we might be able to function in your environment. We are able to create a TEAR in what you perceive as Time and Space in order to travel great distances for our research. We repair the tear when we return to our own planet.

Our Planet is smaller than EARTH and has 4 of your MOONS. Two of these moons we inhabit. One of these is for QUARENTINE of those of  our world who are ill or injured. It is necessary that those be separated from the rest of our world until healed. The other MOON is for production of the CRYSTALS that provide our power and propulsion for our vessels. The Production of the CRYSTALS is a highly volatile and dangerous procedure that could harm our environment.

Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

The VESSEL creates communications points at the locations where we make contact with your species . These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

At the given time, we will initiate contact with your species. There is much to prepare before any contact with your world. We have observed your world evolve and there is still much that could be harmful to our world through contact with your world. Your world could not understand our physical or mental forms at this time, or the means by which we are able to traverse â??ETHOSâ?.
     
The â??ANSWERâ?
(2)

Our Traverse's are possible due to the absence of what your world is limited to by the presence of a Physical form. Our existence is of the PROCESS and not the FORM.

Some of our species have been lost during our research and their PROCESS ended due to interaction with your world. Your world is warned to respect, protect, and nourish the PROCESS.

We value all PROCESS of our species and find it the most important element of existence.

We have watched you and researched your worlds attempts to traverse  â??ETHOSâ?

We have many different VESSELS  designed for specific research of the worlds of our research.

We find your world interesting for the structure of so many elements.
Our world is devoid of these elements as they are not necessary for the existence of our PROCESS.
 
Our VESSELS travel at will and initiate contact with yours and other species as needed for our research.

Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?
â??WE ARE OLTISSIS OF ETHOSâ?

(End of message)


 
The ANSWER I have pursued has been given.
I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors
10/06/2010




 


I wanted to take a moment to comment on this document and provide some additional information on it's content and a short explanation of some of the terms.
 I believe that by the terms Process & Form, they are referring to Mind &
> Body or perhaps Soul, Life Force, Being and Body, or Mass of some type. The
> message was given to me and I understood it completely. But when I read it
> it sounds weird. Also you will notice all the capitalized words and terms in
> the text. I felt as if they wanted me to emphasize those words and terms and
> they wanted them capitalized for that purpose. I normally don't do that in
> my correspondence unless in a header or such. I do capitalize the first
> letter of a lot of words for effect, but not the entire word.  Strange !!!
> Also the message leaves me feeling that they communicate with all forms of
> life including plant, animal, human, microbial, or whatever. I want to take
> some time and look for those "Greek" sounding words and see if they exist
> anywhere in recent or ancient text or mythology. I am puzzled and
> fascinated. I tried to write word for word every word of their message , but
> as far as spelling I was on my own based on how it seemed to be transmitted
> to my mind.
                                                                                  Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 07, 2010, 11:11:23 PM
I returned to the same location at the same time this morning to see if could make contact again. I spent well over an hour verbally asking the same questions i asked yesterday along with several i had not asked. There was no response and no feeling as i felt yesterday and no telepathic message delivered. I will continue to try for the next few days and post any results here. Honestly, i had trouble getting the courage to do this again, but i feel it is still important and yes there are many more questions unanswered. But i know in the case of my experience at least that the Drone Craft that i witnessed is THEIRS and not OURS. In that, i stand firm on my comment that " I COULD NOT ASK FOR MORE".  I would ask that any of the "WITNESSES" out there attempt the same procedure and return to the point of your experience and try to make contact. This may be the "DOOR" that leads to the knowledge that we ALL have been searching for. After my experience in 2007 i have made it very clear time and again that the only things i wanted to know about all this is WHO is responsible?, WHAT is the purpose?, and  WHY this is happening? , For my own personal peace of mind.  I thought that after yesterday i would have no more questions in my mind about all this. But after 24 hours of thinking and reliving the whole experience i find myself with more questions than ever. I will post these soon and see if anyone here wants to pursue the answers or has any ideas or suggestions in regards to these unanswered questions. As for myself, i am content for the moment with the knowledge i have been given as to WHO, WHAT, & WHY.

                                                                                      Thanks, Ted
Here are a few of the questions that i want to present to the forum. I invite  any and all to comment and offer your input and or possible answers. I will begin with the subject of the Tree.

> After my encounter in 2007 the tree began to slowly die.
> If a communications channel, maybe an invisible beam has existed since then, could whatever power or force applied since 2007 be responsible for the tree's slow death?
>
> The tests that found traces of palladium in the tree don't seem to make any sense until now.
> Could the force or power used contain the element Palladium?
> Could the Crystals the beings spoke of possibly contain this element?
>
> When I received the telepathic message I was standing within a foot or so of where the tree trunk was.
> Could this Electrical charge be a part of this Com Channel ?
> What future effect might this exposure have on my body and or mind?

                                                                         Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 08, 2010, 02:25:05 AM
                                                                                      Thanks, Ted
Quote
Here are a few of the questions that i want to present to the forum. I invite  any and all to comment and offer your input and or possible answers. I will begin with the subject of the Tree.

> After my encounter in 2007 the tree began to slowly die.
> If a communications channel, maybe an invisible beam has existed since then, could whatever power or force applied since 2007 be responsible for the tree's slow death?
>
> The tests that found traces of palladium in the tree don't seem to make any sense until now.
> Could the force or power used contain the element Palladium?
> Could the Crystals the beings spoke of possibly contain this element?
>
> When I received the telepathic message I was standing within a foot or so of where the tree trunk was.
> Could this Electrical charge be a part of this Com Channel ?
> What future effect might this exposure have on my body and or mind?

                                                                         Thanks, Ted

Ted:

I wouldn't be too concerned about the tree or the crystals or the palladium myself.  Who knows what happened to it.  I don't think you will have any lasting effect from the beam they used to connect to you.

My guess is that they contacted you because they could sense your anxiety and concern about seeing their probe in '07.  Are they out to make friends and have more contact with you?  Who knows?

 I would thank them for the effort they initially made to communicate with you.  Just be patient and live your everyday life.  I am sure they know your location and they can contact you whenever they want to.....if they want to.  That's the question.

I suspect if they feel you sound  unstable or full of too many questions they may shy away from you. Just thank them and pray that you would like to talk with them again if at all possible and leave it at that.  They probably don't like to be ordered around....not that you are, but they may sense that feeling.

Douglas

 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 08, 2010, 03:01:11 PM

I am.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.

I am:

http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_verbs_sum.htm (http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_verbs_sum.htm)


Sure there's more questions to ask...

If Ted is in the belief that he has recieved information about the "Drones", even though it's through telepathy or any
other means, it sure beats what else has come forward here for some time.

So if Ted has anything to share here, it can only be to our benefit...

Let's set aside our prejudice for a short while, if that is what's the question here..

Please continue, Ted!

EVS
Thanks, EVS. I hope
> everyone on the forum will understand that the message I received is what I
> believe is my answer to my experience, but not the only answer. This is a
> big picture and CARET/ Issac/ PACL/ Issac, Raj,  and all the other avenues
> are still very strong  and documented evidence for the Drone saga. I still
> firmly believe that there is much more to this mystery that includes all
> these elements and more. I encourage everyone to keep digging.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 08, 2010, 03:04:46 PM
                                                                                      Thanks, Ted
Quote
Here are a few of the questions that i want to present to the forum. I invite  any and all to comment and offer your input and or possible answers. I will begin with the subject of the Tree.

> After my encounter in 2007 the tree began to slowly die.
> If a communications channel, maybe an invisible beam has existed since then, could whatever power or force applied since 2007 be responsible for the tree's slow death?
>
> The tests that found traces of palladium in the tree don't seem to make any sense until now.
> Could the force or power used contain the element Palladium?
> Could the Crystals the beings spoke of possibly contain this element?
>
> When I received the telepathic message I was standing within a foot or so of where the tree trunk was.
> Could this Electrical charge be a part of this Com Channel ?
> What future effect might this exposure have on my body and or mind?

                                                                         Thanks, Ted

Ted:

I wouldn't be too concerned about the tree or the crystals or the palladium myself.  Who knows what happened to it.  I don't think you will have any lasting effect from the beam they used to connect to you.

My guess is that they contacted you because they could sense your anxiety and concern about seeing their probe in '07.  Are they out to make friends and have more contact with you?  Who knows?

 I would thank them for the effort they initially made to communicate with you.  Just be patient and live your everyday life.  I am sure they know your location and they can contact you whenever they want to.....if they want to.  That's the question.

I suspect if they feel you sound  unstable or full of too many questions they may shy away from you. Just thank them and pray that you would like to talk with them again if at all possible and leave it at that.  They probably don't like to be ordered around....not that you are, but they may sense that feeling.

Douglas
Thanks Douglas for the feedback and thanks for sharing your experiences as they have been very helpful in understanding my own.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 08, 2010, 03:08:56 PM


 
Let's set aside our prejudice for a short while, if that is what's the question here...

Well said !

I'm very curious of what"s going to go ...

Ted : try again - who know ?

and tks to share .
Thanks guerande.     Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 08, 2010, 03:18:26 PM
Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

...I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors

I have touched the face of God yet will never make a claim to be more enlightened or greater than another being. Our collective knowledge prospers with the tide of thought and effort evolving over time but insight ... that comes only from within.

I am.

Unfortunately 'Ted' you waited a long time to reveal your game but stumbled in its execution.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.
There is no game please read my last entry. And yes everyone is free to believe what they will. Thanks for the response.     
                                                                           Ted
It is a shame that DRT does not have the HUMOR factor of the UFOCB, but i guess we are just too darn busy dealing with researching the facts and documenting the truth to poke fun at those serious about the Drone subject. I am sure the makers of a certain brand of Candy and Bottled Water are thrilled to have the free website advertising though.                                            Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on October 08, 2010, 03:48:28 PM
I'm confused Ted are you saying your recent revelation is a joke and everyone should have a sense of 'humor'?

Honestly I was excited when you began to share your original information but this latest channeling telepathically seems a bit too far out for me.

I hope you're not another Leviathan injecting themselves into the Drone mystery only later to be outed tripping themselves up with bogus evidence.

If you truly can link up then you can eventually reconnect and get specific answers about the Caret information, language etc. That would prove your experiences.

You either fall into one of four categories;
A hoaxer (Leviathan Level 1)
A delusional person that believes contact was made with himself. (Leviathan Level 2)
A person that had a sighting but for some reason needs to embellish their story with a fantasy. (Leviathan Level 3)

Or a person that is telling the truth.

If this is a one time link then I'm afraid I'm going to have to assume you're another Leviathan.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 08, 2010, 03:54:53 PM
I'm confused Ted are you saying your recent revelation is a joke and everyone should have a sense of 'humor'?

Honestly I was excited when you began to share your original information but this latest channeling telepathically seems a bit too far out for me.

I hope you're not another Leviathan injecting themselves into the Drone mystery only later to be outed tripping themselves up with bogus evidence.

If you truly can link up then you can eventually reconnect and get specific answers about the Caret information, language etc. That would prove your experiences.

You either fall into one of four categories;
A hoaxer (Leviathan Level 1)
A delusional person that believes contact was made with himself. (Leviathan Level 2)
A person that had a sighting but for some reason needs to embellish their story with a fantasy. (Leviathan Level 3)

Or a person that is telling the truth.

If this is a one time link then I'm afraid I'm going to have to assume you're another Leviathan.
No No No !!! Go to the UFOCB website. I was referring to the comments about my experience posted there. Sorry for the confusion              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 08, 2010, 04:02:58 PM
I'm confused Ted are you saying your recent revelation is a joke and everyone should have a sense of 'humor'?

Honestly I was excited when you began to share your original information but this latest channeling telepathically seems a bit too far out for me.

I hope you're not another Leviathan injecting themselves into the Drone mystery only later to be outed tripping themselves up with bogus evidence.

If you truly can link up then you can eventually reconnect and get specific answers about the Caret information, language etc. That would prove your experiences.

You either fall into one of four categories;
A hoaxer (Leviathan Level 1)
A delusional person that believes contact was made with himself. (Leviathan Level 2)
A person that had a sighting but for some reason needs to embellish their story with a fantasy. (Leviathan Level 3)

Or a person that is telling the truth.

If this is a one time link then I'm afraid I'm going to have to assume you're another Leviathan.
No No No !!! Go to the UFOCB website. I was referring to the comments about my experience posted there. Sorry for the confusion              Ted
Sorry, forgot to post the link http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=drone&action=display&num=1258745506&start=570 (http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=drone&action=display&num=1258745506&start=570)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on October 08, 2010, 07:39:18 PM
Hi Ted and all,

don't know if somebody know this amazing  " tree  " observed at
Rendlesham - England . It seem to have some similarities with
Ted's tree ...

  http://www.culture-crop.com/rendleshamforeste.htm (http://www.culture-crop.com/rendleshamforeste.htm)

Enjoy !
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 08, 2010, 09:26:07 PM
Those people over at UFOCB can laugh all they want.  They even laugh at me. I could care less.

I have studied UFO contactee reports for 50 years and Ted's contact with the OLTISSISians is typical of how extraterrestrials communicate with us lowly earth denizens. 

For the newbies and skeptics at UFOCB, Ted's contact,  content and method used to communicate with him is nothing new. 

If and until I discover contrary evidence, Ted's contact remains fascinating and genuine.  [If he made it up, that's his problem, not mine.]  I take people as they come down the road.  That philosophy has served me very well for a long time.

Namaste,

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 08, 2010, 09:35:34 PM
Hi Ted and all,

don't know if somebody know this amazing  " tree  " observed at
Rendlesham - England . It seem to have some similarities with
Ted's tree ...

  http://www.culture-crop.com/rendleshamforeste.htm (http://www.culture-crop.com/rendleshamforeste.htm)

Enjoy !

Amazing Guerande.  Very possible that the tree did react to that UFO encounter in the 1980s.  Thanks for posting. 

When I had my encounter with spirit entities at 10:15, Aug,25, 1995, I was in a state of shock for weeks afterward. [For a reference to know what happened to me, see, "Cosmic Consciousness"  Bucke, 1899.]

The amazing colors of the tree stump are a clue that something very unusual happened to that tree.  Few people realize that trees actually communicate with their environment and other plants and trees in their neighborhood.

All life is interconnected...even if it's extraterrestrial!

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on October 09, 2010, 02:50:48 AM
When I had my encounter with spirit entities at 10:15, Aug,25, 1995, I was in a state of shock for weeks afterward. [For a reference to know what happened to me, see, "Cosmic Consciousness"  Bucke, 1899.]
Link to book here:
http://realityhead.com/uploads/Cosmic_Consciousness.pdf (http://realityhead.com/uploads/Cosmic_Consciousness.pdf)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on October 09, 2010, 09:52:18 AM
I hope you're not another Leviathan injecting themselves into the Drone mystery only later to be outed tripping themselves up with bogus evidence.
See my earlier post.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.

If Ted is in the belief that he has recieved information about the "Drones", even though it's through telepathy or any other means, it sure beats what else has come forward here for some time.

So if Ted has anything to share here, it can only be to our benefit...

Let's set aside our prejudice for a short while... EVS

Yes, well said EVS. Until determined otherwise, one might knowingly choose to assume that Ted's unsupported account is genuine.

However, as Danblast pointed out, we should also be wary of attention-seeking delusionals who prey upon the desires of individuals believing in extraterrestrial visitation.  At best, the delusionals confuse the situation and at worst they reduce the credibility of ufology and serve the disinformation agenda.

EVS, honestly I have not been prejudiced. Earlier this year I suspended disbelief and allowed Ted ample time to provide supporting information and also (with allowance for the alleged security and employment concerns) allowed Ted sufficient time for self-research material and presented further details here at the DRT. Just one example is the IR camera technical specifications which may eventually have been of use in the search for ââ?¬Ë?dronesââ?¬â?¢.

I am saying that 'Ted' has not come forward with verifiable details. If he genuinely sought to contribute... compelled to seek answers... by now he could have changed his job and fully come forward publically as the first real-life 'drone witness' and a genuine ââ?¬Ë?siteââ?¬â?¢ investigation would have commenced with a more thorough site-based analysis... independently verifying the palladium story, the tree, more detailed follow through with the company in question to see if they had any other such reports or mis-direction from government agencies regarding the drones etc.

(Ted's stated location if real, would be quite easy to identify due to the limited number of aerospace/defense firms in BI, Alabama but I (nor others here) do not 'out' someone if they don't have the courage to do it themselves.)

To my knowledge, DRT or elsewhere, apart from developing his own tale, 'Ted' has not substantially participated in researching any other aspect of the Isaac/PACL material... this is particularly true for the period prior to May 2010. Since 2007, do you know anyone else who HASN�T participated across the board in this forum in trying to resolve various aspects of the PACL material or the various drone photographs? It seems to me that most members here are compelled to contribute and research ... out of a very strong interest in determining the truth of the ISAAC/CARET account yet for most parts, Ted has focussed on his own account despite the very obvious connections.

Now, with Tedââ?¬â?¢s recent posts and his OLTISSIS experience I noted an error (one which I would not expect an advanced extraterrestrial species to make and thus the error falls to the execution of Tedââ?¬â?¢s tale) and perhaps this is only obvious to myself.... but this is enough for me to decide that ââ?¬Ë?Tedââ?¬â?¢ is not genuine, that is, I believe his account to be fictional.

There are numerous other points I could make but I am not really trying to influence your decision making only to explain my own process and suggest that my decision as to the veracity of Ted�s tale was not prejudiced. It is simply... a personal decision.

So after six months, my unbiased determination is that I do not believe Ted�s tale. We need not follow the same path. I will not criticise you if you choose to believe it, nor do I intend to interfere in the interaction with Ted, I only advise others here at the DRT to be cautious of the detrimental effects that a fictional story may have to the Isaac materials and to ufology as a whole.

All life, all existence, all matter, form and energy is embedded as a process - your individual journey here included.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on October 09, 2010, 10:13:47 AM
I can't  " believe  " Ted, right now. He's free to develop his story, and I'll see
if all of that story could be real. If he is dishonest, he will sure do some errors
and then I'll do my own jugement ...
( Note plse that I wrote  " I  " and not  " we  " !  )

Who knows ?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 09, 2010, 04:07:41 PM
The â??ANSWERâ?!! It was right there all the time!!
(1)
For the last 3 ½ years I have been searching for the answer to the EXISTANCE, the ORIGIN, and the PURPOSE of the Drone Craft I encountered. I have pondered, wondered, and worried over this phenomenon since my sighting, I have researched, networked and discussed  this event over and over with no real answers. A few days ago I decided to take a simple and direct approach. To return to the exact location of my experience at the same time of the morning and see if anything would happen. This morning 10/06/2010 at 05:15, I returned to the site. The following is a detailed report of what happened.

At 05:15 this morning I returned to the site of my experience with the Drone Craft in 2007. I sat near the location of where the tree had been during my original sighting. The tree is no longer there as it fell during a storm in the summer of 2010. The stump was removed a week after the tree fell. As I sat there, I began to verbally ask the following questions. â?? I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? WHO ARE YOU? WHAT IS YOUR PURPOSE? WHERE ARE YOU FROM? IS THE DRONE YOURS OR OURS? CAN YOU GIVE ME ANSWERS?
There was no immediate response. I sat for a few minutes longer. I decided to get up and leave. As I began to rise, I felt a surge of what felt like electrical current surge through every part of my body. At the same instant I received what I can only describe as a telepathic message clear and explicit with the following message. (Quoted)
â??WE ARE OF OLTISSISâ?. â??  â?? THE 23rd PLANET IN OUR SYSTEMâ?  â?? THE VESSEL IS OF OUR ORIGINâ? â??WHAT DO YOU SEEKâ? ?
My reply was tell me all you can so I can understand.

(Okay, at this point I am totally freaked out!!!!)
The information begins to roll into my thoughts as if it is being downloaded from a computer.
Here is everything I remember given in telepathic message.

The Vessel is an information probe that enables us to understand your environment. Our native environment is unlike yours, so we wish to learn so that we might be able to function in your environment. We are able to create a TEAR in what you perceive as Time and Space in order to travel great distances for our research. We repair the tear when we return to our own planet.

Our Planet is smaller than EARTH and has 4 of your MOONS. Two of these moons we inhabit. One of these is for QUARENTINE of those of  our world who are ill or injured. It is necessary that those be separated from the rest of our world until healed. The other MOON is for production of the CRYSTALS that provide our power and propulsion for our vessels. The Production of the CRYSTALS is a highly volatile and dangerous procedure that could harm our environment.

Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

The VESSEL creates communications points at the locations where we make contact with your species . These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

At the given time, we will initiate contact with your species. There is much to prepare before any contact with your world. We have observed your world evolve and there is still much that could be harmful to our world through contact with your world. Your world could not understand our physical or mental forms at this time, or the means by which we are able to traverse â??ETHOSâ?.
     
The â??ANSWERâ?
(2)

Our Traverse's are possible due to the absence of what your world is limited to by the presence of a Physical form. Our existence is of the PROCESS and not the FORM.

Some of our species have been lost during our research and their PROCESS ended due to interaction with your world. Your world is warned to respect, protect, and nourish the PROCESS.

We value all PROCESS of our species and find it the most important element of existence.

We have watched you and researched your worlds attempts to traverse  â??ETHOSâ?

We have many different VESSELS  designed for specific research of the worlds of our research.

We find your world interesting for the structure of so many elements.
Our world is devoid of these elements as they are not necessary for the existence of our PROCESS.
 
Our VESSELS travel at will and initiate contact with yours and other species as needed for our research.

Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?
â??WE ARE OLTISSIS OF ETHOSâ?

(End of message)


 
The ANSWER I have pursued has been given.
I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors
10/06/2010




 


My
original encounter with the Drone Craft was quite a shock to me and after
all this time it still far too bizarre for me to fully comprehend. But
honestly, when I decided to return to make contact I did not expect anything
to happen. This event is just far too much for me to try to even think about
right now. Coupled together and without any physical proof I just don't feel
I have much credibility. I want as much evidence as possible before I loose
credibility with the DRT forum members. I can understand their reluctance to
believe anything at face value, especially in light of folks feeding garbage and misinformation. They, (we), deserve better than
that. Through my experiences I know this is a real phenomenon and deserves
much research and attention. I have been so absorbed in my own experience
that I am guilty of not fully participating in many of the forum
discussions. I have however read the majority of the posts in all the
threads and tried to educate myself some on the other cases. If I felt it
would lend any information that would help in any case presented, I would
gladly divulge all the info about my workplace and any possible connection
with the Drone Craft even at the possibility of losing my job, but there is
just nothing there to connect with these craft. No secret government
installation or lab or test site or anything like it. It is not so much even
the credibility issue but the lack of hard visual physical evidence in my
case that troubles me. I am not delusional, I am not a Hoaxer, I am not a
Disinformation Agent!! I am an ordinary person who has been put in an
extraordinary situation not of his own making and possibly an eyewitness and
contact to one of the greatest events this planet has ever seen. The proof
of life on other worlds!! For that I feel it is my duty to document and
prove beyond a shadow of doubt that this is all REAL!!! I will not post anything further until and unless i have concrete proof and evidence. That may be tomorrow, next week, or next year.  But i will continue to pursue all avenues and research because it is just that important. I continue to be available for all questions and comments.

                                                                       Thanks ALL,  TED
                                                                                 

                                                                               
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 09, 2010, 06:39:54 PM
I hope you're not another Leviathan injecting themselves into the Drone mystery only later to be outed tripping themselves up with bogus evidence.
See my earlier post.

So I too will not ask for more.  There are no more answers here yet each is free to believe how they will.



Now, with Tedââ?¬â?¢s recent posts and his OLTISSIS experience I noted an error (one which I would not expect an advanced extraterrestrial species to make and thus the error falls to the execution of Tedââ?¬â?¢s tale) and perhaps this is only obvious to myself.... but this is enough for me to decide that ââ?¬Ë?Tedââ?¬â?¢ is not genuine, that is, I believe his account to be fictional.


Hi iam:

What error did you note??
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 09, 2010, 06:47:02 PM
Hello Ted:

BTW, regardless of what others say, don't feel you are obligated to perform some sort of research about Drones.  Please feel welcome to post any information you have concerning your contact, Drones or any other item you feel we would be interested in.

Take care,

Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on October 09, 2010, 10:39:24 PM
We as a species are more complex than a simple summation, our minds capable of far more than most of us imagine - yet we often seek confirmation of thought to appease the spark within rather than to challenge it anew. How would an advanced alien species observe us  - now, today - and what might they learn from our millenia of change and the PROCESS of our own advancement?

Ted your most recent post was most intelligent and I congratulate you for it. When I read the quoted section and your recent words, the contrast between the two is like night and day... at least in terms of tone and language. An exceptional effort.

My posting in this thread was meant as a caution to others here and was not intended to hinder your efforts - clearly you wish to communicate your experiences and there are people at the DRT who wish to hear them. You have already started your path and I guess you've chosen the right place because you are unlikely to receive torrents of abuse at this forum... unlike some sites you may be aware of. Perhaps in communicating here at the DRT you will learn something about your own process?




Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 09, 2010, 10:58:34 PM
To iamiamiam:

 "I will not criticise you if you choose to believe it, nor do I intend to interfere in the interaction with Ted, I only advise others here at the DRT to be cautious of the detrimental effects that a fictional story may have to the Isaac materials and to ufology as a whole."

First, my post in question was not personally related, and not an attack on your beliefs. I apologize if it was taken as such.

Second, here at the DRT Forum we deal with research that relate to the "California Drones", with the aim to find the truth about them.

The way we obtain this is for the case irrelevant. Investigation of such stories will show if they are legitimate. I sure trust the members here to make judgement of their own, and taking any given source into consideration is not gullible or "Far Out"- any stone needs to be turned. Scientifically this today may sound like magic, but tomorrow science might bring even more magical issues to the stand. And here you should listen, and listen carefully:

What seems like fiction today, may be real in the not so distant future. Development in science and engineering is rapidly changing,
just like what happened a few generations ago. Only today it's alot faster coming.

I'm also quite sure that what Ted says here in this forum can't shed a bad light on Ufology itself. Several other cases more severe might do the excact same job, with a lot more readers than this forum have.

I never said I believe what Ted says, I only wanted all in here to have the opportunity to judge for themselves.

If this isn't a fair deal, I certainly have to question my interest and time and work I've done here.

If we leave out any clue or witness report we are close to end this investigation with the same answer most
forums already doomed this to be, a clever hoax. I don't think the "Drone Research Team" needs to do so, until
this case is solved. Utterly, and with no further questions to ask.

EVS

PS: In a linear line of thought there's often little room for deviations from the pattern that is given. This is what many highly educated people share, it's like blinders on a horse. Not to be confused with narrowness, simply not in vision for some.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 10, 2010, 01:38:26 AM
When I had my encounter with spirit entities at 10:15, Aug,25, 1995, I was in a state of shock for weeks afterward. [For a reference to know what happened to me, see, "Cosmic Consciousness"  Bucke, 1899.]
Link to book here:
http://realityhead.com/uploads/Cosmic_Consciousness.pdf (http://realityhead.com/uploads/Cosmic_Consciousness.pdf)
Thanks OTF for the link. I will certainly read.

                                                              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on October 10, 2010, 07:40:56 AM
First, my post in question was not personally related, and not an attack on your beliefs. I apologize if it was taken as such.

No worries EVS. I didn't see it as an attack. I just wanted to explain the reason why I posted (recently) in this thread and to indicate it wasn't a prejudiced belief which influenced my decision making.

I agree with most of your post - it's a fair deal - I've had my say, so I'll just shut up and leave you all to it  ;)

One query I have though - and it's not meant in an offensive manner - should one seek an answer for the sake of having an answer? Should a man feed his curiousity even with information which comes as a potentially unprovable distraction from a void of uncertainty? It's a challenge we all face at least at some point in our lives, is it not? How do you prepare for questions which may go unanswered, perhaps for the rest of your life?

Enjoy your sunday.

 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 10, 2010, 08:20:36 AM
One query I have though - and it's not meant in an offensive manner - should one seek an answer for the sake of having an answer? Should a man feed his curiousity even with information which comes as a potentially unprovable distraction from a void of uncertainty? It's a challenge we all face at least at some point in our lives, is it not? How do you prepare for questions which may go unanswered, perhaps for the rest of your life?

Thank you for your reply.

You can't prepare for questions like that. I think it lies deep within Us all to seek...regardless of what answer might be found, if any.

This whole drone affair may go unanswered! But if we didn't look for a possible answer, how would we feel about that in the end?
Not everything needs an answer. And it's not everything that requires an answer. Really, I think it's up to every single person what he or she want's to be answered.

Enjoy your sunday as well,
EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: elevenaugust on October 10, 2010, 09:06:34 PM
I have been so absorbed in my own experience that I am guilty of not fully participating in many of the forum discussions. I have however read the majority of the posts in all the threads and tried to educate myself some on the other cases.
Hi Ted,

So you have read all the 427 threads and 29000+ posts on the "California Drone Image/CARET documents (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cali1)" on Open Minds Forum?

Wow!! Did you ever thought of trying to contact any other witnesses?

And what do you think of all the research that have been done over there?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 10, 2010, 11:09:29 PM
I have been so absorbed in my own experience that I am guilty of not fully participating in many of the forum discussions. I have however read the majority of the posts in all the threads and tried to educate myself some on the other cases.
Hi Ted,

So you have read all the 427 threads and 29000+ posts on the "California Drone Image/CARET documents (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cali1)" on Open Minds Forum?

Wow!! Did you ever thought of trying to contact any other witnesses?

And what do you think of all the research that have been done over there?

Thanks!
Hi EA. No , sorry i have only read whats on the DRT forum and some links posted. I have tried to make contact with other witnesses but so far i have been successful with only one who i have been in contact with for a few months now. We have shared our experiences and discussed the similarities and differences.

                                                                                          Thanks, Ted


   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 11, 2010, 12:03:33 AM
I have been so absorbed in my own experience that I am guilty of not fully participating in many of the forum discussions. I have however read the majority of the posts in all the threads and tried to educate myself some on the other cases.
Hi Ted,

So you have read all the 427 threads and 29000+ posts on the "California Drone Image/CARET documents (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cali1)" on Open Minds Forum?

Wow!! Did you ever thought of trying to contact any other witnesses?

And what do you think of all the research that have been done over there?

Thanks!
Hi EA. No , sorry i have only read whats on the DRT forum and some links posted. I have tried to make contact with other witnesses but so far i have been successful with only one who i have been in contact with for a few months now. We have shared our experiences and discussed the similarities and differences.

                                                                                          Thanks, Ted


   
P.S. Thanks for link i will start browsing thru it ASAP. My job keeps me very busy as well as my music interest and my time is limited. Hopefully, when i retire in 4 years i will have more time to spend on this subject.
                                                                          Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on October 13, 2010, 05:55:04 PM
I have been so absorbed in my own experience that I am guilty of not fully participating in many of the forum discussions. I have however read the majority of the posts in all the threads and tried to educate myself some on the other cases.
Hi Ted,

So you have read all the 427 threads and 29000+ posts on the "California Drone Image/CARET documents (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cali1)" on Open Minds Forum?

Wow!! Did you ever thought of trying to contact any other witnesses?

And what do you think of all the research that have been done over there?

Thanks!

Noooooo !  Don't do it for your own sanity's sake.    ;D


Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on October 13, 2010, 06:07:43 PM
It is a shame that DRT does not have the HUMOR factor of the UFOCB, but i guess we are just too darn busy dealing with researching the facts and documenting the truth to poke fun at those serious about the Drone subject. I am sure the makers of a certain brand of Candy and Bottled Water are thrilled to have the free website advertising though.                                            Ted
I gotta disagree on this point, Ted.
I been around since before all of this began and watched it all degenerate into a cesspool of kookiness all under the guise of humor.   That only succeeded in chasing away any serious thought on the subject leaving only the mindless dregs.

If you want humor there are plenty of places on the internet to find it.  There is also a place called, (gasp), "real life" that is full of humor and a beautiful place to practice it.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 13, 2010, 11:02:16 PM
It is a shame that DRT does not have the HUMOR factor of the UFOCB, but i guess we are just too darn busy dealing with researching the facts and documenting the truth to poke fun at those serious about the Drone subject. I am sure the makers of a certain brand of Candy and Bottled Water are thrilled to have the free website advertising though.                                            Ted
I gotta disagree on this point, Ted.
I been around since before all of this began and watched it all degenerate into a cesspool of kookiness all under the guise of humor.   That only succeeded in chasing away any serious thought on the subject leaving only the mindless dregs.

If you want humor there are plenty of places on the internet to find it.  There is also a place called, (gasp), "real life" that is full of humor and a beautiful place to practice it.
This comment was not directed at the DRT forum members. It was directed at the members of of other forums, UFOCB in particular who seem to find it more advantageous to make light and humor of this subject than to spend time seriously researching and discussing the facts and information presented about the Drone Craft. I apologize to the DRT and members for any confusion this created.
                                                                                                        Ted   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 13, 2010, 11:27:04 PM
I have been so absorbed in my own experience that I am guilty of not fully participating in many of the forum discussions. I have however read the majority of the posts in all the threads and tried to educate myself some on the other cases.
Hi Ted,

So you have read all the 427 threads and 29000+ posts on the "California Drone Image/CARET documents (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cali1)" on Open Minds Forum?

Wow!! Did you ever thought of trying to contact any other witnesses?

And what do you think of all the research that have been done over there?

Thanks!

Noooooo !  Don't do it for your own sanity's sake.    ;D
No , not for my sanity's sake. For the purpose of becoming more informed about all aspects of this mystery. I have not been able to spend the time and effort that many of the DRT members have researching and discussing this subject. I only wish to become more educated on all aspects of the Drone Craft Mystery so that i might be able to participate in a meaningful way and to possibly help understand this subject by presenting my own experiences in an organized and credible fashion. I respect the integrity and devotion fo the DRT and it's members to finding the answers to this mystery.
                                                                           Respectfully, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 13, 2010, 11:55:25 PM
Ted, at this point of time, I have great respect that you chose to reveal your experience with the members here at DRT.

This might show to be cruzial later, (think this over, guy's)...if you persists to let Us all here know what you have
encountered, strange as it may seem, that is taken as valid encounter evidence here, and will be asked for as evidence of a witness, are you willing to take the stand to do so, as this is not a court of law? (Saing you are not forced to speak, but do it in free will?).

Just joking, ofcourse...but if we are to take this encounter of yours seriously, we need some verifiable evidence. I know you can't do this at the moment, but allow us some time to verify your encounters.

Would you be able to meet with one of us? Is it possible to meet and share your personal thoughts in person?

I'm sure it's possible to do so.

All the best, I tend to believe you, but I'm on the fence here right now. I need more proof.


EVS

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 14, 2010, 12:42:13 AM
Ted, at this point of time, I have great respect that you chose to reveal your experience with the members here at DRT.

This might show to be cruzial later, (think this over, guy's)...if you persists to let Us all here know what you have
encountered, strange as it may seem, that is taken as valid encounter evidence here, and will be asked for as evidence of a witness, are you willing to take the stand to do so, as this is not a court of law? (Saing you are not forced to speak, but do it in free will?).

Just joking, ofcourse...but if we are to take this encounter of yours seriously, we need some verifiable evidence. I know you can't do this at the moment, but allow us some time to verify your encounters.

Would you be able to meet with one of us? Is it possible to meet and share your personal thoughts in person?

I'm sure it's possible to do so.

All the best, I tend to believe you, but I'm on the fence here right now. I need more proof.


EVS
Thanks EVS for those comments. To this point i have limited personal contact to a couple of individuals who i have trusted to keep my idenity and contact information from being disclosed as well as the one Witness who i have stated that i have been in contact with. These folks have proved their willingness to keep my personal information safe from public view. I am open to the possibility of contact with members of this forum but please understand i have a very rewarding and active life and career  outside the DRONE community and do not wish to jeopardize any of this in a MEDIA CIRCUS concerning my experiences. Therefore, i would initially have to limit contact to any personal messages anyone might wish to post here in the DRT under "MY MESSAGES".
I will make contact on a one to one basis  and be willing to communicate at length there and possibly thru the use of SKYPE YAHOO MSGR or other IM/VOICE format. I ask that you please understand all this is due to the initial media crush i recieved after my encounter in 2007 and the EARTHFILES and COAST TO COAST interviews with Linda Moulton Howe. I simply do not want a repeat performance of that experience. I also will remain available for for questions and comments here on the DRT FORUM.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 14, 2010, 01:00:23 AM
Ted, at this point of time, I have great respect that you chose to reveal your experience with the members here at DRT.

This might show to be cruzial later, (think this over, guy's)...if you persists to let Us all here know what you have
encountered, strange as it may seem, that is taken as valid encounter evidence here, and will be asked for as evidence of a witness, are you willing to take the stand to do so, as this is not a court of law? (Saing you are not forced to speak, but do it in free will?).

Just joking, ofcourse...but if we are to take this encounter of yours seriously, we need some verifiable evidence. I know you can't do this at the moment, but allow us some time to verify your encounters.

Would you be able to meet with one of us? Is it possible to meet and share your personal thoughts in person?

I'm sure it's possible to do so.

All the best, I tend to believe you, but I'm on the fence here right now. I need more proof.


EVS
Thanks EVS for those comments. To this point i have limited personal contact to a couple of individuals who i have trusted to keep my idenity and contact information from being disclosed as well as the one Witness who i have stated that i have been in contact with. These folks have proved their willingness to keep my personal information safe from public view. I am open to the possibility of contact with members of this forum but please understand i have a very rewarding and active life and career  outside the DRONE community and do not wish to jeopardize any of this in a MEDIA CIRCUS concerning my experiences. Therefore, i would initially have to limit contact to any personal messages anyone might wish to post here in the DRT under "MY MESSAGES".
I will make contact on a one to one basis  and be willing to communicate at length there and possibly thru the use of SKYPE YAHOO MSGR or other IM/VOICE format. I ask that you please understand all this is due to the initial media crush i recieved after my encounter in 2007 and the EARTHFILES and COAST TO COAST interviews with Linda Moulton Howe. I simply do not want a repeat performance of that experience. I also will remain available for for questions and comments here on the DRT FORUM.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

I can guarantee you safe passage if you are willing to meet with one of us from the DRT!

All it takes is a short passage of when and where, I'm sure you'll be met by a single person,
not a "Media Circus".

It can be arranged, so that you will never be exposed to the public.

If this is to your liking, all you need is to clear this with the person you are to encounter.

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 14, 2010, 01:02:45 AM
Ted, at this point of time, I have great respect that you chose to reveal your experience with the members here at DRT.

This might show to be cruzial later, (think this over, guy's)...if you persists to let Us all here know what you have
encountered, strange as it may seem, that is taken as valid encounter evidence here, and will be asked for as evidence of a witness, are you willing to take the stand to do so, as this is not a court of law? (Saing you are not forced to speak, but do it in free will?).

Just joking, ofcourse...but if we are to take this encounter of yours seriously, we need some verifiable evidence. I know you can't do this at the moment, but allow us some time to verify your encounters.

Would you be able to meet with one of us? Is it possible to meet and share your personal thoughts in person?

I'm sure it's possible to do so.

All the best, I tend to believe you, but I'm on the fence here right now. I need more proof.


EVS
Thanks EVS for those comments. To this point i have limited personal contact to a couple of individuals who i have trusted to keep my idenity and contact information from being disclosed as well as the one Witness who i have stated that i have been in contact with. These folks have proved their willingness to keep my personal information safe from public view. I am open to the possibility of contact with members of this forum but please understand i have a very rewarding and active life and career  outside the DRONE community and do not wish to jeopardize any of this in a MEDIA CIRCUS concerning my experiences. Therefore, i would initially have to limit contact to any personal messages anyone might wish to post here in the DRT under "MY MESSAGES".
I will make contact on a one to one basis  and be willing to communicate at length there and possibly thru the use of SKYPE YAHOO MSGR or other IM/VOICE format. I ask that you please understand all this is due to the initial media crush i recieved after my encounter in 2007 and the EARTHFILES and COAST TO COAST interviews with Linda Moulton Howe. I simply do not want a repeat performance of that experience. I also will remain available for for questions and comments here on the DRT FORUM.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

I can guarantee you safe passage if you are willing to meet with one of us from the DRT!

All it takes is a short passage of when and where, I'm sure you'll be met by a single person,
not a "Media Circus".

It can be arranged, so that you will never be exposed to the public.

If this is to your liking, all you need is to clear this with the person you are to encounter.

EVS
Thanks, and yes i have a member of the DRT in mind. I will keep you advised.

                                                                                                     Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 14, 2010, 01:34:29 AM
Ted, at this point of time, I have great respect that you chose to reveal your experience with the members here at DRT.

This might show to be cruzial later, (think this over, guy's)...if you persists to let Us all here know what you have
encountered, strange as it may seem, that is taken as valid encounter evidence here, and will be asked for as evidence of a witness, are you willing to take the stand to do so, as this is not a court of law? (Saing you are not forced to speak, but do it in free will?).

Just joking, ofcourse...but if we are to take this encounter of yours seriously, we need some verifiable evidence. I know you can't do this at the moment, but allow us some time to verify your encounters.

Would you be able to meet with one of us? Is it possible to meet and share your personal thoughts in person?

I'm sure it's possible to do so.

All the best, I tend to believe you, but I'm on the fence here right now. I need more proof.


EVS
Thanks EVS for those comments. To this point i have limited personal contact to a couple of individuals who i have trusted to keep my idenity and contact information from being disclosed as well as the one Witness who i have stated that i have been in contact with. These folks have proved their willingness to keep my personal information safe from public view. I am open to the possibility of contact with members of this forum but please understand i have a very rewarding and active life and career  outside the DRONE community and do not wish to jeopardize any of this in a MEDIA CIRCUS concerning my experiences. Therefore, i would initially have to limit contact to any personal messages anyone might wish to post here in the DRT under "MY MESSAGES".
I will make contact on a one to one basis  and be willing to communicate at length there and possibly thru the use of SKYPE YAHOO MSGR or other IM/VOICE format. I ask that you please understand all this is due to the initial media crush i recieved after my encounter in 2007 and the EARTHFILES and COAST TO COAST interviews with Linda Moulton Howe. I simply do not want a repeat performance of that experience. I also will remain available for for questions and comments here on the DRT FORUM.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

I can guarantee you safe passage if you are willing to meet with one of us from the DRT!

All it takes is a short passage of when and where, I'm sure you'll be met by a single person,
not a "Media Circus".

It can be arranged, so that you will never be exposed to the public.

If this is to your liking, all you need is to clear this with the person you are to encounter.

EVS
Thanks, and yes i have a member of the DRT in mind. I will keep you advised.

                                                                                                     Ted
Hi EVS, I have contacted "On The Fence" and he has expressed interest in this. If for any reason this is not possible let me know and we will decide on another contact.
                                                                                         
                                                                                         Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 14, 2010, 01:42:23 AM
Does anyone here live close to Ted?

And is there a possibility that you can make a contact?

I would like to do so myself, but I live in Denmark, Europe.

If no one here are able to meet with Ted, I'm sorry to say the meeting cannot be done.

I apologize for the invite, Ted.  Sorry.

I hope you stay online here at the DRT.

EVS 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 14, 2010, 01:48:18 AM
Does anyone here live close to Ted?

And is there a possibility that you can make a contact?

I would like to do so myself, but I live in Denmark, Europe.

If no one here are able to meet with Ted, I'm sorry to say the meeting cannot be done.

I apologize for my invitement, Ted.

I hope you stay online here at the DRT.

EVS
I think LEV lives in Georgia, LOL  Oh MY !!
Seriously, if anyone is interested i am open to this but there will be some conditions.
EVS thanks for your attempt. Will Do!!
                                                        Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on October 16, 2010, 01:10:46 AM
The â??ANSWERâ?!! It was right there all the time!!
(1)
For the last 3 ½ years I have been searching for the answer to the EXISTANCE, the ORIGIN, and the PURPOSE of the Drone Craft I encountered. I have pondered, wondered, and worried over this phenomenon since my sighting, I have researched, networked and discussed  this event over and over with no real answers. A few days ago I decided to take a simple and direct approach. To return to the exact location of my experience at the same time of the morning and see if anything would happen. This morning 10/06/2010 at 05:15, I returned to the site. The following is a detailed report of what happened.

At 05:15 this morning I returned to the site of my experience with the Drone Craft in 2007. I sat near the location of where the tree had been during my original sighting. The tree is no longer there as it fell during a storm in the summer of 2010. The stump was removed a week after the tree fell. As I sat there, I began to verbally ask the following questions. â?? I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? WHO ARE YOU? WHAT IS YOUR PURPOSE? WHERE ARE YOU FROM? IS THE DRONE YOURS OR OURS? CAN YOU GIVE ME ANSWERS?
There was no immediate response. I sat for a few minutes longer. I decided to get up and leave. As I began to rise, I felt a surge of what felt like electrical current surge through every part of my body. At the same instant I received what I can only describe as a telepathic message clear and explicit with the following message. (Quoted)
â??WE ARE OF OLTISSISâ?. â??  â?? THE 23rd PLANET IN OUR SYSTEMâ?  â?? THE VESSEL IS OF OUR ORIGINâ? â??WHAT DO YOU SEEKâ? ?
My reply was tell me all you can so I can understand.

(Okay, at this point I am totally freaked out!!!!)
The information begins to roll into my thoughts as if it is being downloaded from a computer.
Here is everything I remember given in telepathic message.

The Vessel is an information probe that enables us to understand your environment. Our native environment is unlike yours, so we wish to learn so that we might be able to function in your environment. We are able to create a TEAR in what you perceive as Time and Space in order to travel great distances for our research. We repair the tear when we return to our own planet.

Our Planet is smaller than EARTH and has 4 of your MOONS. Two of these moons we inhabit. One of these is for QUARENTINE of those of  our world who are ill or injured. It is necessary that those be separated from the rest of our world until healed. The other MOON is for production of the CRYSTALS that provide our power and propulsion for our vessels. The Production of the CRYSTALS is a highly volatile and dangerous procedure that could harm our environment.

Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

The VESSEL creates communications points at the locations where we make contact with your species . These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

At the given time, we will initiate contact with your species. There is much to prepare before any contact with your world. We have observed your world evolve and there is still much that could be harmful to our world through contact with your world. Your world could not understand our physical or mental forms at this time, or the means by which we are able to traverse â??ETHOSâ?.
     
The â??ANSWERâ?
(2)

Our Traverse's are possible due to the absence of what your world is limited to by the presence of a Physical form. Our existence is of the PROCESS and not the FORM.

Some of our species have been lost during our research and their PROCESS ended due to interaction with your world. Your world is warned to respect, protect, and nourish the PROCESS.

We value all PROCESS of our species and find it the most important element of existence.

We have watched you and researched your worlds attempts to traverse  â??ETHOSâ?

We have many different VESSELS  designed for specific research of the worlds of our research.

We find your world interesting for the structure of so many elements.
Our world is devoid of these elements as they are not necessary for the existence of our PROCESS.
 
Our VESSELS travel at will and initiate contact with yours and other species as needed for our research.

Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?
â??WE ARE OLTISSIS OF ETHOSâ?

(End of message)


 
The ANSWER I have pursued has been given.
I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors
10/06/2010

Hello Ted,

What do you mean by PROCESS?

Can you go back and ask follow up questions?

I'd be curious to know the method of propulsion these probes use.

How long have they been here?

How does the cloaking work?

You said "Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?.  Was there a typo in that?  Did you mean "Your world is in it's infancy of â??ETHOS"?  I'm thinking of the Greek word "ethos".  Is that what was meant?

How far away from Earth is OLTISSIS in light years.  Is it in our Milky Way galaxy?


Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 16, 2010, 03:53:54 PM
The â??ANSWERâ?!! It was right there all the time!!
(1)
For the last 3 ½ years I have been searching for the answer to the EXISTANCE, the ORIGIN, and the PURPOSE of the Drone Craft I encountered. I have pondered, wondered, and worried over this phenomenon since my sighting, I have researched, networked and discussed  this event over and over with no real answers. A few days ago I decided to take a simple and direct approach. To return to the exact location of my experience at the same time of the morning and see if anything would happen. This morning 10/06/2010 at 05:15, I returned to the site. The following is a detailed report of what happened.

At 05:15 this morning I returned to the site of my experience with the Drone Craft in 2007. I sat near the location of where the tree had been during my original sighting. The tree is no longer there as it fell during a storm in the summer of 2010. The stump was removed a week after the tree fell. As I sat there, I began to verbally ask the following questions. â?? I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? WHO ARE YOU? WHAT IS YOUR PURPOSE? WHERE ARE YOU FROM? IS THE DRONE YOURS OR OURS? CAN YOU GIVE ME ANSWERS?
There was no immediate response. I sat for a few minutes longer. I decided to get up and leave. As I began to rise, I felt a surge of what felt like electrical current surge through every part of my body. At the same instant I received what I can only describe as a telepathic message clear and explicit with the following message. (Quoted)
â??WE ARE OF OLTISSISâ?. â??  â?? THE 23rd PLANET IN OUR SYSTEMâ?  â?? THE VESSEL IS OF OUR ORIGINâ? â??WHAT DO YOU SEEKâ? ?
My reply was tell me all you can so I can understand.

(Okay, at this point I am totally freaked out!!!!)
The information begins to roll into my thoughts as if it is being downloaded from a computer.
Here is everything I remember given in telepathic message.

The Vessel is an information probe that enables us to understand your environment. Our native environment is unlike yours, so we wish to learn so that we might be able to function in your environment. We are able to create a TEAR in what you perceive as Time and Space in order to travel great distances for our research. We repair the tear when we return to our own planet.

Our Planet is smaller than EARTH and has 4 of your MOONS. Two of these moons we inhabit. One of these is for QUARENTINE of those of  our world who are ill or injured. It is necessary that those be separated from the rest of our world until healed. The other MOON is for production of the CRYSTALS that provide our power and propulsion for our vessels. The Production of the CRYSTALS is a highly volatile and dangerous procedure that could harm our environment.

Your worlds interpretation of what you call TIME & SPACE is incorrect. ALL is INFINATE.

The VESSEL creates communications points at the locations where we make contact with your species . These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed.

At the given time, we will initiate contact with your species. There is much to prepare before any contact with your world. We have observed your world evolve and there is still much that could be harmful to our world through contact with your world. Your world could not understand our physical or mental forms at this time, or the means by which we are able to traverse â??ETHOSâ?.
     
The â??ANSWERâ?
(2)

Our Traverse's are possible due to the absence of what your world is limited to by the presence of a Physical form. Our existence is of the PROCESS and not the FORM.

Some of our species have been lost during our research and their PROCESS ended due to interaction with your world. Your world is warned to respect, protect, and nourish the PROCESS.

We value all PROCESS of our species and find it the most important element of existence.

We have watched you and researched your worlds attempts to traverse  â??ETHOSâ?

We have many different VESSELS  designed for specific research of the worlds of our research.

We find your world interesting for the structure of so many elements.
Our world is devoid of these elements as they are not necessary for the existence of our PROCESS.
 
Our VESSELS travel at will and initiate contact with yours and other species as needed for our research.

Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?
â??WE ARE OLTISSIS OF ETHOSâ?

(End of message)


 
The ANSWER I have pursued has been given.
I could not ask for more.

Ted Connors
10/06/2010

Hello Ted,

What do you mean by PROCESS?

Can you go back and ask follow up questions?

I'd be curious to know the method of propulsion these probes use.

How long have they been here?

How does the cloaking work?

You said "Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?.  Was there a typo in that?  Did you mean "Your world is in it's infancy of â??ETHOS"?  I'm thinking of the Greek word "ethos".  Is that what was meant?

How far away from Earth is OLTISSIS in light years.  Is it in our Milky Way galaxy?
Hi EA, By PROCESS, i must assume they are referring to lifeforce, soul, or spirit. This is how i interpreted it in the message i received. They seem to be indicating a non physical existence of some kind. I have returned twice since my original contact and followed the same procedure exactly with no results. I plan to return periodically to continue to attempt contact , but based on the message i received in my original contact,

"The VESSEL creates communications points at the locations where we make contact with your species . These communication points remain open until such time as the contact returns to initiate contact with us. After this contact it is closed",

i am not sure it will be possible. I do think from what they relayed to me in the message, that channels may still remain open for other witnesses.

I also would like to know about the propulsion of these craft. I certainly will ask if given another opportunity to communicate.

As to how long they have been here, i have no idea. But another of the comments,

 
"At the given time, we will initiate contact with your species. There is much to prepare before any contact with your world. We have observed your world evolve and there is still much that could be harmful to our world through contact with your world. Your world could not understand our physical or mental forms at this time, or the means by which we are able to traverse â??ETHOSâ?.

seems to indicate that they have observed us for a long long time!!

As far as Cloaking, Propulsion, or Control they gave no real information on how all this is accomplished.

BY the statement, Your world in it's infancy is of â??ETHOSâ?, i understood it to mean that our earth is an infant in the universe as i understood the term ETHOS as being the universe as we know it.

I have no idea as to the distance to OLTISSIS or what Galaxy it might be located in. The telepathic message was broken off before i could continue to ask any further questions or elaborate on the information they had just given to me. With my mind in a whirl, i was trying to decide where to go next with my questions when the telepathic messages just abruptly ended.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 16, 2010, 11:52:47 PM
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process (http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_theology (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_theology)

--o0o--

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos)

--o0o--

The Church of Oltissi, located in Turkey.

Might be what they are referring to, it's an ancient city, not very large.

That's all I can find at the moment, I hope this is helpful.

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: mgrandin on October 17, 2010, 01:01:58 AM

I have no idea as to the distance to OLTISSIS or what Galaxy it might be located in. The telepathic message was broken off before i could continue to ask any further questions or elaborate on the information they had just given to me. With my mind in a whirl, i was trying to decide where to go next with my questions when the telepathic messages just abruptly ended.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

To me you still appear rather trustworthy,  although I understand some must hesitate when hearing your added experience regarding this "drone"- or what it was. Meeting again at the same place for communication must be very uncommon - but if true I guess the "phenomenon" steered you to meet up there.  But how could you remember so precisely what they told you in this stressed situation - but some people have good memory.  You may be a selected contactee by this "phenomenon", perhaps meant to prepare us humans for something.

I am rather much apt to believe in such things because I have had som strange experiences myself - but not of exactly this kind.   8)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 17, 2010, 01:53:45 AM

I have no idea as to the distance to OLTISSIS or what Galaxy it might be located in. The telepathic message was broken off before i could continue to ask any further questions or elaborate on the information they had just given to me. With my mind in a whirl, i was trying to decide where to go next with my questions when the telepathic messages just abruptly ended.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

To me you still appear rather trustworthy,  although I understand some must hesitate when hearing your added experience regarding this "drone"- or what it was. Meeting again at the same place for communication must be very uncommon - but if true I guess the "phenomenon" steered you to meet up there.  But how could you remember so precisely what they told you in this stressed situation - but some people have good memory.  You may be a selected contactee by this "phenomenon", perhaps meant to prepare us humans for something.

I am rather much apt to believe in such things because I have had som strange experiences myself - but not of exactly this kind.   8)
I am in my late 50's. My memory is still fairly good, but not near as good as it was, say when i was in my twenties and thirties. Almost 5 hours passed between the time i received the message and the time i wrote the information down. The fascinating thing was that this information remained vivid in my mind for that extended time and as i was writing it just rolled from my mind as if it being read from a CD or some recording device. At the time, i remembered every quote and statement as if it were etched or burned into my mind. As soon as i documented it in writing, it left my memory. Within 2 hours after i documented this in what i refer to as my OMG Document, i had to go back and read the information to refresh my memory on what information had actually been given. I have no explanation for this temporary retention of the telepathic message i was given. It is so out of the ordinary as to how i normally retain and recall information on a regular basis. As with most people, after a short amount of time, you tend to forget or change certain facts or wordings from exact information you may have gotten in normal conversations with other people. But in the case of this message given in telepathic form rather than verbal form it seemed to remain intact just as it was transmitted or recorded into my memory.

                                                                                             Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on October 17, 2010, 05:32:16 AM
Quote
But in the case of this message given in telepathic form rather than verbal form it seemed to remain intact just as it was transmitted or recorded into my memory............Thanks, Ted

From my experience with messages transmitted to me by off planet beings, they are meant to stay with you.  The extraterrestrials are very adept at this.  Our mind is not totally  contained within the body anyway....certain parts of our memory exist outside the body per se.

 Your personality can actually leave the body and travel to other places as in an out-of-body experience. I had one last week while I was sleeping.  I know it sounds fantastic but it actually happened, as I verified it by email two days ago.

Long story short....I live in California and I had a completely unplanned meeting with someone I know in Hawaii in the middle of our mutual  sleep time. Amazing things happen because humans are actually spirit beings living a life in a physical body on this planet at this time.

The mind is the most powerful 'object' in the universe.

In the case of Ted, these memories will persist for a long time and they will be revived every time he looks at his notes.  It will be like it happened yesterday.

Doug..........

 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on October 19, 2010, 07:06:22 PM
Ted,

Is this the first time you have received a telepathic message?  Have you ever had any type of ESP experience prior to this?  About your message, was it a voice in your head like you had on earphones?  Was it a mental picture like a dream? 

Did you get the feeling it was spiritual in nature like religious?  I think most people would associate the drones with an "Ethos" that is the opposite of spirituality.  It seems more of a technical/mechanical thing.

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 19, 2010, 10:42:00 PM
Ted,

Is this the first time you have received a telepathic message?  Have you ever had any type of ESP experience prior to this?  About your message, was it a voice in your head like you had on earphones?  Was it a mental picture like a dream? 

Did you get the feeling it was spiritual in nature like religious?  I think most people would associate the drones with an "Ethos" that is the opposite of spirituality.  It seems more of a technical/mechanical thing.
No, the first time was during my encounter with the Drone Craft in 2007, as i documented in my interview with Linda Moulton Howe and here on the DRT Forum. The only experience i have ever had prior to this is as a kid in the 70's experimenting with the ESP game created by the "Amazing Kreskin", the popular ESP Guru of tjhe 70's. But that was just playing around as a teen. I received the messages in visual text. Each message was a full statement that appeared in my mind as Black Letters printed on a Dark Silver Background. I got no particular feeling of any religious or spiritual input or feeling. It seemed more of a Digital Image transmitted into my memory.

                                                                                             Thanks, Ted
                                                                                     
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on October 20, 2010, 01:45:25 PM
Is this the first time you have received a telepathic message?  ...

No, the first time was during my encounter with the Drone Craft in 2007, as i documented in my interview with Linda Moulton Howe and here on the DRT Forum.

Ted,
Just to be clear, you mean that the "fear" feeling you got during your 2007 encounter was a telepathic message?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 20, 2010, 03:35:51 PM
Is this the first time you have received a telepathic message?  ...

No, the first time was during my encounter with the Drone Craft in 2007, as i documented in my interview with Linda Moulton Howe and here on the DRT Forum.

Ted,
Just to be clear, you mean that the "fear" feeling you got during your 2007 encounter was a telepathic message?
Yes, Now i do. I was not so sure then as it seemed so brief and blunt. Just a  short telepathic message. But this last encounter really brought it to my attention and now i can see it for what it really was. I did not see the 2007 message in a text form in my mind as i have my recent encounter, but i really think it is all the same. At least the response and my reactions were the same with the exception of the "Fear" feeling i had in 2007. The latest encounter i would classify my feelings as "Amazement", but not any fear of harm.
                                                                                     Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 26, 2010, 03:11:13 AM

I have no idea as to the distance to OLTISSIS or what Galaxy it might be located in. The telepathic message was broken off before i could continue to ask any further questions or elaborate on the information they had just given to me. With my mind in a whirl, i was trying to decide where to go next with my questions when the telepathic messages just abruptly ended.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

To me you still appear rather trustworthy,  although I understand some must hesitate when hearing your added experience regarding this "drone"- or what it was. Meeting again at the same place for communication must be very uncommon - but if true I guess the "phenomenon" steered you to meet up there.  But how could you remember so precisely what they told you in this stressed situation - but some people have good memory.  You may be a selected contactee by this "phenomenon", perhaps meant to prepare us humans for something.

I am rather much apt to believe in such things because I have had som strange experiences myself - but not of exactly this kind.   8)
I am in my late 50's. My memory is still fairly good, but not near as good as it was, say when i was in my twenties and thirties. Almost 5 hours passed between the time i received the message and the time i wrote the information down. The fascinating thing was that this information remained vivid in my mind for that extended time and as i was writing it just rolled from my mind as if it being read from a CD or some recording device. At the time, i remembered every quote and statement as if it were etched or burned into my mind. As soon as i documented it in writing, it left my memory. Within 2 hours after i documented this in what i refer to as my OMG Document, i had to go back and read the information to refresh my memory on what information had actually been given. I have no explanation for this temporary retention of the telepathic message i was given. It is so out of the ordinary as to how i normally retain and recall information on a regular basis. As with most people, after a short amount of time, you tend to forget or change certain facts or wordings from exact information you may have gotten in normal conversations with other people. But in the case of this message given in telepathic form rather than verbal form it seemed to remain intact just as it was transmitted or recorded into my memory.

                                                                                             Thanks, Ted
Over the past few weeks I have been doing a little investigating into the apparent use of the "GREEK" language, phrases and names referenced in my telepathic encounter. It seems to be a running theme in many telepathic encounters with Alien races. I have visited many websites and forums dedicated to Telepathy and Alien Contact and have found many many references to the Greek Language and Greek Mythology. I am finding this very interesting and intriguing as to the connections with the Greek Culture and it's possible connection with possible Alien Civilizations.
                                                                                              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: JMK on October 26, 2010, 11:25:37 AM
Well, a link to an ancient civilization could be one approach. On the other hand the translation device could be at a loss to find the right wording, and making the best substitions at hand.

Oltissis would suggest that which pertains to Oltissi. And the nearest match would seem to be Oltisi, a town in eastern Turkey, which goes by this name in the Georgian language. Associated with it is a certain type of black stone, or black amber, named Oltu stone, with which a number of positive qualities were associated since ancient times. Anyway, this may only be coincidence.

In general the mechanical way that the message is relayed, and eventually transferred to paper, reminds a bit of Stan Romanek's contacts. He claims not to understand a bit of the mathematical details he received and had afterwards mechanically written down. Nevertheless some elements of it, a tesseract for instance, are meaningful mathematical concepts. 

What stands out more to me in the message, is the concept of "tearing space". This is not that often encountered, so one may consider searching for instances where it entered the vernacular. One would distinguish it from space warping, which by some accounts would be a generated wave in spacetime on which the craft would slide towards a destination.

One could imagine three possible sources for the term: 1. Science, 2. Science fiction, and 3. extraterrestrial contact or abductee accounts.

Besides some mutterings about possible tearing of spacetime by nuclear weapons and black holes, mostly recent, I don't find references to this concept in science. In science fiction and games there are however some references to be found:

The earliest I can find, for the mean while, is in a 1986 arcade game "Momoko 120%" which mentions the concept, and in the Star Trek: 25th Anniversary video game of 1991 one finds another reference to it. Then in Dreamland and Dreamland II, Nov-Dec 1998 deliveries of The X-Files series there is a reference again to "tearing of spacetime".

One previous instance, to my limited knowledge, mentions tearing of space or spacetime in connection with a claimed alien contact, the 2008 case of the Ukrainian couple, Vladimir & Olga Voronezhskiy. In this case there is a suggestion of the Andromeda galaxy as origin, and who knows, maybe space tearing is related to intergalactic as opposed to interstellar travel. The Voronezhskiy case incorporates some elements in common with Ted's telepathic message, and possibly the drones:
* Tearing of space in space travel
* Telepathic communication via a voice perceived inside the contactee's mind
* Craft transparency by employing a field

The article is still available on the web, but a version is attached here dotted with my subjective emphasis points, and some added notes in square brackets, which may highlight some points held in common, or the identity of the entities and their intentions. Ukrainian officials support claim on UFO.doc (http://www.divshare.com/download/12970646-7d0)
The original story is at: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2009/01/08/02994.html (http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2009/01/08/02994.html)


JMK
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 26, 2010, 06:09:13 PM
Well, a link to an ancient civilization could be one approach. On the other hand the translation device could be at a loss to find the right wording, and making the best substitions at hand.

Oltissis would suggest that which pertains to Oltissi. And the nearest match would seem to be Oltisi, a town in eastern Turkey, which goes by this name in the Georgian language. Associated with it is a certain type of black stone, or black amber, named Oltu stone, with which a number of positive qualities were associated since ancient times. Anyway, this may only be coincidence.

In general the mechanical way that the message is relayed, and eventually transferred to paper, reminds a bit of Stan Romanek's contacts. He claims not to understand a bit of the mathematical details he received and had afterwards mechanically written down. Nevertheless some elements of it, a tesseract for instance, are meaningful mathematical concepts. 

What stands out more to me in the message, is the concept of "tearing space". This is not that often encountered, so one may consider searching for instances where it entered the vernacular. One would distinguish it from space warping, which by some accounts would be a generated wave in spacetime on which the craft would slide towards a destination.

One could imagine three possible sources for the term: 1. Science, 2. Science fiction, and 3. extraterrestrial contact or abductee accounts.

Besides some mutterings about possible tearing of spacetime by nuclear weapons and black holes, mostly recent, I don't find references to this concept in science. In science fiction and games there are however some references to be found:

The earliest I can find, for the mean while, is in a 1986 arcade game "Momoko 120%" which mentions the concept, and in the Star Trek: 25th Anniversary video game of 1991 one finds another reference to it. Then in Dreamland and Dreamland II, Nov-Dec 1998 deliveries of The X-Files series there is a reference again to "tearing of spacetime".

One previous instance, to my limited knowledge, mentions tearing of space or spacetime in connection with a claimed alien contact, the 2008 case of the Ukrainian couple, Vladimir & Olga Voronezhskiy. In this case there is a suggestion of the Andromeda galaxy as origin, and who knows, maybe space tearing is related to intergalactic as opposed to interstellar travel. The Voronezhskiy case incorporates some elements in common with Ted's telepathic message, and possibly the drones:
* Tearing of space in space travel
* Telepathic communication via a voice perceived inside the contactee's mind
* Craft transparency by employing a field

The article is still available on the web, but a version is attached here dotted with my subjective emphasis points, and some added notes in square brackets, which may highlight some points held in common, or the identity of the entities and their intentions. Ukrainian officials support claim on UFO.doc (http://www.divshare.com/download/12970646-7d0)
The original story is at: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2009/01/08/02994.html (http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2009/01/08/02994.html)


JMK
Thanks JMK for that input and information. I am still puzzling this "GREEK" thing. I have no Greek Ancestry or any connection to Greece. I am guessing this is common to all contacts of this Alien civilization,  but it's just my opinion.
                                                                             Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 29, 2010, 08:46:53 PM
Hi Ted,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_letters_used_in_mathematics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_letters_used_in_mathematics)

Greek Alphabet (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qgd11XPE0U#ws)

Maybe this can be of help?

Maybe the information you recieved was in the understanding that the Greek Alfabet is widely used in mathematics, and in
measurements of electrical systems.

Sorry for the late reply.

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 30, 2010, 02:53:36 AM
Hi Ted,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_letters_used_in_mathematics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_letters_used_in_mathematics)

Greek Alphabet (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qgd11XPE0U#ws)

Maybe this can be of help?

Maybe the information you recieved was in the understanding that the Greek Alfabet is widely used in mathematics, and in
measurements of electrical systems.

Sorry for the late reply.

EVS
Thanks EVS This whole Greek Connection is getting more intriguing as time goes by. Digging up new info and trying to piece it together. Maybe another dead end, but the search is quite interesting. Even though the Greek references and Greek letters don't seem to fit with the Drone symbols, there is something there i just can't put my finger on yet but feel strongly there is some common denominator here.

                                                                                               Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on December 16, 2010, 07:53:31 PM
Ted,

I have a couple of questions for you.
Quote
Out of all the things i have experienced in my 2 encounters that convinced me of this being real, It wasn't the Sighting in 2007 or even the Telepathic Message i received in 2010. Oddly enough, It was the look of concern, almost terror in the faces of the 2 strange men who visited me shortly after my sighting in 2007 that really convinced me of the Total reality of this whole Drone subject.
Can you go into more detail about this experience?  Sorry if you already did.  I'd like to know more about the two men.  How were they dressed?  What were they driving?  How old?  Why would they have terror in their faces?  Anything else you can think of.

Also, you talked about the dead tree where the drone was sighted.  You mentioned detecting palladium in it.  How was that determined?  Was a study conducted?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on December 16, 2010, 09:53:48 PM
Ted,

I have a couple of questions for you.
Quote
Out of all the things i have experienced in my 2 encounters that convinced me of this being real, It wasn't the Sighting in 2007 or even the Telepathic Message i received in 2010. Oddly enough, It was the look of concern, almost terror in the faces of the 2 strange men who visited me shortly after my sighting in 2007 that really convinced me of the Total reality of this whole Drone subject.
Can you go into more detail about this experience?  Sorry if you already did.  I'd like to know more about the two men.  How were they dressed?  What were they driving?  How old?  Why would they have terror in their faces?  Anything else you can think of.

Also, you talked about the dead tree where the drone was sighted.  You mentioned detecting palladium in it.  How was that determined?  Was a study conducted?
Hi, You can read the entire account here,

http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors)

The traces of Palladium were discovered after the dead tree fell during a wind storm. I had pieces examined by a mutual acquaintance of a friend who worked for the Alabama Dept. of Forestry. I was able to save a small sample for my future use and records.

                                                                                                      Ted   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on December 16, 2010, 10:24:28 PM
Palladium, now this makes a lot of sense.  The BB Drone is definitely showing at least two colors.  I thought the whitish silver areas might be a ceramic of some kind, but Palladium seems a better fit.  The other major color seems copper or bronze to me.  Now the would be "CG artists" were once again very clever or is the BB Drone REAL!
THE BB DRONE, LAP, AND INVENTORY PHOTO are the keys to this.
Palladium is a rare and lustrous silvery-white metal that was discovered in 1803.
L E V I A T H A N

PS:  Look up Palladium for some real surprises concerning its uses.

PPS:  Does Palladium help produce the special field required for the LAP.  On the BB Drone, the LAP design appears on whitish silver panels!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on December 16, 2010, 11:03:17 PM
Palladium, now this makes a lot of sense.
Something to chew on!

Here is the BB drone compared to some "selected" images of Palladium, it appears that the oxidized state is not purely reflective of all colours, but may contain a dark golden colour:

(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm106/onthefence55/PdComposite.jpg)

Of course anything reflective in the presence of trees and other outdoor lighting will take on that colour as well.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on December 17, 2010, 01:57:33 AM

I have no idea as to the distance to OLTISSIS or what Galaxy it might be located in. The telepathic message was broken off before i could continue to ask any further questions or elaborate on the information they had just given to me. With my mind in a whirl, i was trying to decide where to go next with my questions when the telepathic messages just abruptly ended.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

To me you still appear rather trustworthy,  although I understand some must hesitate when hearing your added experience regarding this "drone"- or what it was. Meeting again at the same place for communication must be very uncommon - but if true I guess the "phenomenon" steered you to meet up there.  But how could you remember so precisely what they told you in this stressed situation - but some people have good memory.  You may be a selected contactee by this "phenomenon", perhaps meant to prepare us humans for something.

I am rather much apt to believe in such things because I have had som strange experiences myself - but not of exactly this kind.   8)
I am in my late 50's. My memory is still fairly good, but not near as good as it was, say when i was in my twenties and thirties. Almost 5 hours passed between the time i received the message and the time i wrote the information down. The fascinating thing was that this information remained vivid in my mind for that extended time and as i was writing it just rolled from my mind as if it being read from a CD or some recording device. At the time, i remembered every quote and statement as if it were etched or burned into my mind. As soon as i documented it in writing, it left my memory. Within 2 hours after i documented this in what i refer to as my OMG Document, i had to go back and read the information to refresh my memory on what information had actually been given. I have no explanation for this temporary retention of the telepathic message i was given. It is so out of the ordinary as to how i normally retain and recall information on a regular basis. As with most people, after a short amount of time, you tend to forget or change certain facts or wordings from exact information you may have gotten in normal conversations with other people. But in the case of this message given in telepathic form rather than verbal form it seemed to remain intact just as it was transmitted or recorded into my memory.

                                                                                             Thanks, Ted
Over the past few weeks I have been doing a little investigating into the apparent use of the "GREEK" language, phrases and names referenced in my telepathic encounter. It seems to be a running theme in many telepathic encounters with Alien races. I have visited many websites and forums dedicated to Telepathy and Alien Contact and have found many many references to the Greek Language and Greek Mythology. I am finding this very interesting and intriguing as to the connections with the Greek Culture and it's possible connection with possible Alien Civilizations.
                                                                                              Ted
Update on OLTISSIS and my continuing search for the Greek Connection.

I found a book at the local library titled "Greek Legends and Lore Revisited" by Fredrico Ionidies. The term OLTISSIS is mentioned twice in reference to a Mythological Place of Pleasure to be  compared with the Chinese Pleasure Palace of "XANADU" of the 4th century A.D. Quite Interesting!!!!!!
                                                                                             Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on December 17, 2010, 02:11:39 AM
Hi, You can read the entire account here,

http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors)
Oh yes I had seen that before.  Can you elaborate on the look of terror you mentioned?  At what point in the conversation did you notice that?  Do you have any idea why they asked about military operations?  Did you ask to see any ID?  Did they indicate what office or entity they were representing?  Did you get the idea they were armed?  This other guy with the military uniform, what branch was the uniform?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on December 17, 2010, 02:24:32 AM
Hi, You can read the entire account here,

http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors)
Oh yes I had seen that before.  Can elaborate on the look of terror you mentioned?  At what point in the conversation did you notice that?  Do you have any idea why they asked about military operations?  Did you ask to see any ID?  Did they indicate what office or entity they were representing?  Did you get the idea they were armed?  This other guy with the military uniform, what branch was the uniform?
The look of terror and urgency was apparent from the moment i opened my front door. I was in a state of shock and they started firing questions, so i did not get a chance to ask any questions. They provided ID that looked Authentic, but i thought it odd that it was U.S. Navy Dept. ID and not USAF as Maxwell AFB is the closest Military Installation. They never stated they were from Maxwell or the USAF, but i assumed they were. I Assumed they were armed as I, myself am in my profession most of the time.There was no branch insignia or insignia of rank on the subject dressed in uniform.

                                                                                                     Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: 10538 on December 17, 2010, 06:05:45 PM
Ted,

How was the palladium discovered?  What form was it in?  Like dust on the tree?  Could it be seen with the naked eye?  Does anything use palladium in that vicinity such as industrial work?  Any chance the palladium killed the tree?
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on December 17, 2010, 07:06:57 PM
Palladium and copper can have a special relationship.  You might want to look into it.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on December 18, 2010, 06:23:02 AM
I didn't find anything extraordinary on Palladium Copper. Perhaps you can provide better references.

Simply because of the symbols identified by Jesse Marcel and their similarity to the LAP symbols, together with the Battelle Institute's research into Titanium alloys post-Roswell (see link here:
http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=information&action=display&thread=2240&page=9 (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=information&action=display&thread=2240&page=9))

then I would lean toward a thin-film titanium alloy (*ignore the nitinol debate) as a superstructure (not the computational substrate): something akin to the liquidmetal metallic glass developed by caltech.

http://www.sandisk.com/Assets/File/Downloads/photos/retail/battery/Sansa%20back%20case.jpg (http://www.sandisk.com/Assets/File/Downloads/photos/retail/battery/Sansa%20back%20case.jpg)
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/technologies/liquidmetal.html (http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/technologies/liquidmetal.html)

Although I do think Bismuth is a very interesting material and there is a video of LMH claiming to have analysed a thin-film Bismuth alloy which supposedly had unique origins and properties.

Bismuth metal looks like this:
Lev Cyl MK1 from AVA Magnetic Levitation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PRyHJTN1TA#)
Lev Cube MK1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVVAMg1Vo9U#)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on December 18, 2010, 06:31:31 AM
This might also be instructive:

Bismuth Plates (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6g135HwcLZE#)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on December 18, 2010, 01:52:02 PM
Palladium and copper can have a special relationship.  You might want to look into it.
L E V I A T H A N

I did, and with some interest I might add:

RE: Alloy of copper and palladium

Quote
Copper - Palladium Alloy: Better Catalysts for Energy Production
Scientists Develop Palladium-rich Copper Alloy Nanoparticles for the Fuel Cell Industry


"As a result, the palladium:copper etched alloy was a much better catalyst than pure palladium for the fuel cell reaction - about 5 times better. It accomplished this while only being 25% palladium (the rest copper)."

at

 http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5675032/copper_palladium_alloy_better_catalysts_pg2.html?cat=15 (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5675032/copper_palladium_alloy_better_catalysts_pg2.html?cat=15)



Wish I had $$$$$ for the stock market/futures trading.

LEVIATHAN SIR, you need to be in the stock market!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on December 18, 2010, 04:14:17 PM
Ted,

How was the palladium discovered?  What form was it in?  Like dust on the tree?  Could it be seen with the naked eye?  Does anything use palladium in that vicinity such as industrial work?  Any chance the palladium killed the tree?
I had watched the decline of the tree since 2007. In early 2010, the tree was finally felled by a windstorm. Having questions about the possibility of the Drone Craft interaction with the tree, i decided to obtain some samples and see if they could be tested for any foreign elements,diseases, or chemicals. The test's that were done were inconclusive except for small non visible traces of the mineral Palladium. The consensus of the technician who tested the samples was the trees decay was caused by PINE BLIGHT, which is common her in the Southern U.S.. I researched palladium further and found it is used in industrial manufacturing for such items as Catalytic Converters for automobiles and other plating applications where a strong durable coating is required to minimize corrosion and rust. There are no manufacturing or storage facilities in the area that could cause any airborne or direct contact contamination. Did the Palladium kill the tree???? "The Ten Million Dollar Question" !!!!! You Tell Me ??????

                                                                                                    Ted

                                                                                             

                                                                                           
 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on December 18, 2010, 04:36:21 PM
The research into the property of metals may prove another key to this mystery.  The Drones at this site seem to have quite a few more kicks in them.  Very, very interesting.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on December 18, 2010, 04:37:54 PM
Ted,

How was the palladium discovered?  What form was it in?  Like dust on the tree?  Could it be seen with the naked eye?  Does anything use palladium in that vicinity such as industrial work?  Any chance the palladium killed the tree?
I had watched the decline of the tree since 2007. In early 2010, the tree was finally felled by a windstorm. Having questions about the possibility of the Drone Craft interaction with the tree, i decided to obtain some samples and see if they could be tested for any foreign elements,diseases, or chemicals. The test's that were done were inconclusive except for small non visible traces of the mineral Palladium. The consensus of the technician who tested the samples was the trees decay was caused by PINE BLIGHT, which is common her in the Southern U.S.. I researched palladium further and found it is used in industrial manufacturing for such items as Catalytic Converters for automobiles and other plating applications where a strong durable coating is required to minimize corrosion and rust. There are no manufacturing or storage facilities in the area that could cause any airborne or direct contact contamination. Did the Palladium kill the tree???? "The Ten Million Dollar Question" !!!!! You Tell Me ??????

                                                                                                    Ted

                                                                                             

                                                                                           
Since Palladium is an Anti Corrosive Agent, then this might also bring up the subject of a connection between the Drone Craft and USO's since Palladium is also used for protection of saltwater corrosion in the Seagoing Marine Craft industry. More "Food For Thought" !!!!!!
                                                                                               Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on December 19, 2010, 12:42:09 AM
http://www.webelements.com/ (http://www.webelements.com/)

http://www.webelements.com/palladium/ (http://www.webelements.com/palladium/)

http://www.webelements.com/copper/ (http://www.webelements.com/copper/)

http://www.webelements.com/platinum/geology.html (http://www.webelements.com/platinum/geology.html)

Some periodic table values on the suggested alloy...
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: DroneTeamNews on December 19, 2010, 07:50:56 AM
Thanks EVS. These links go toward my previous point, but perhaps it is missed.

For those who didn't pick up on it - the titanium liquidmetal amorphous / BMG alloy is a NASA supported Caltech spin-off. It also happens to be anti-corrosive and can be applied as a thin film coating suitable for aerospace purposes:

http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2004/ch_7.html (http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2004/ch_7.html)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on December 22, 2010, 02:52:59 AM
This might also be instructive:

That is fascinating ...thanks for the link.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on January 02, 2011, 06:51:27 AM
Ted are you aware of the acoustuc heterodyne? It is a device which can beam a sound signal to a specific person and that person only from hundreds of feet away.

If you are by yourself it would seem like telepathy as the sound is hear only by you through vibrating the skull cavity and inner ear.

If we were standing next to each other it could be sent to you without me even knowing.

http://www.philipnute.com/pdfs/syntele.pdf (http://www.philipnute.com/pdfs/syntele.pdf)

http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/acoustics/288/New-type-of-sound-projection-Is-it-for-real (http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/acoustics/288/New-type-of-sound-projection-Is-it-for-real)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on January 17, 2011, 01:49:31 AM
An update, Ladies and Gentleman, of a use of palladium as of 12/1/2011.


“World's Toughest Known Material”

A collaboration between the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the California Institute of Technology has developed a new form of metallic glass that is stronger and tougher than steel and may in fact be the world's toughest known material.

The new metallic glass is a microalloy featuring palladium, a metal with a high "bulk-to-shear" stiffness that can counteract the brittleness of glassy materials. The palladium allows glassy materials to undergo extensive plasticity in response to stress—it takes less energy to bend than to crack.

"The addition of the palladium provides our amorphous material with an unusual capacity for extensive plastic shielding ahead of an opening crack," explains Ritchie. "This promotes a fracture toughness comparable to those of the toughest materials known. The rare combination of toughness and strength, or damage tolerance, extends beyond the benchmark ranges established by the toughest and strongest materials known."   

January 12, 2011 -By Evan Dashevsky
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2375619,00.asp (http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2375619,00.asp)


Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on January 17, 2011, 02:00:22 AM
And, if my memory serves me at this moment, didn't one of the Rendlesham Forest witnesses say the object looked/resembled/felt like a cold black glass-like metallic object?

Or was that some other description of an equally important well-publicized sighting?

That description has stuck in my mind for some reason...
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on January 17, 2011, 02:26:58 AM
And, if my memory serves me at this moment, didn't one of the Rendlesham Forest witnesses say the object looked/resembled/felt like a cold black glass-like metallic object?

Or was that some other description of an equally important well-publicized sighting?
I recall a  reference of one case to something that looked like Obsidian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsidian).
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 01, 2011, 07:24:41 PM

I have no idea as to the distance to OLTISSIS or what Galaxy it might be located in. The telepathic message was broken off before i could continue to ask any further questions or elaborate on the information they had just given to me. With my mind in a whirl, i was trying to decide where to go next with my questions when the telepathic messages just abruptly ended.

                                                                                               Thanks, Ted

To me you still appear rather trustworthy,  although I understand some must hesitate when hearing your added experience regarding this "drone"- or what it was. Meeting again at the same place for communication must be very uncommon - but if true I guess the "phenomenon" steered you to meet up there.  But how could you remember so precisely what they told you in this stressed situation - but some people have good memory.  You may be a selected contactee by this "phenomenon", perhaps meant to prepare us humans for something.

I am rather much apt to believe in such things because I have had som strange experiences myself - but not of exactly this kind.   8)
I am in my late 50's. My memory is still fairly good, but not near as good as it was, say when i was in my twenties and thirties. Almost 5 hours passed between the time i received the message and the time i wrote the information down. The fascinating thing was that this information remained vivid in my mind for that extended time and as i was writing it just rolled from my mind as if it being read from a CD or some recording device. At the time, i remembered every quote and statement as if it were etched or burned into my mind. As soon as i documented it in writing, it left my memory. Within 2 hours after i documented this in what i refer to as my OMG Document, i had to go back and read the information to refresh my memory on what information had actually been given. I have no explanation for this temporary retention of the telepathic message i was given. It is so out of the ordinary as to how i normally retain and recall information on a regular basis. As with most people, after a short amount of time, you tend to forget or change certain facts or wordings from exact information you may have gotten in normal conversations with other people. But in the case of this message given in telepathic form rather than verbal form it seemed to remain intact just as it was transmitted or recorded into my memory.

                                                                                             Thanks, Ted
Over the past few weeks I have been doing a little investigating into the apparent use of the "GREEK" language, phrases and names referenced in my telepathic encounter. It seems to be a running theme in many telepathic encounters with Alien races. I have visited many websites and forums dedicated to Telepathy and Alien Contact and have found many many references to the Greek Language and Greek Mythology. I am finding this very interesting and intriguing as to the connections with the Greek Culture and it's possible connection with possible Alien Civilizations.
                                                                                              Ted
Hi everyone. After being side tracked for a while by POWERS Great and Bold, I am back. Just wanted to give an update on my continuing search. I have been diligently working on the GREEK connection as well as information given in the Telepathic Message i received. I am currently in process of conferring with an expert scholar on Greek and East Mediterranean history on the subject of the meanings of the Greek References as well as any connection between the CARET and other Drone symbols in reference to Ancient Greek, Turkish, German, or other known Languages. It is my hope that by utilizing the services of a Scholar who is well versed on these subjects, that some information might be found to connect all these clues. I will post updates as they develop and will try to keep the DRT informed of any breaking news or discoveries. There have been numerous recent attempts to thwart my investigations and inquires into the Drone subject and hinder investigations, but i have continued to pursue this because there is an answer to this mystery. I have not been posting here in the DRT forum recently due to this disruption and intimidation but will try to provide information that might be beneficial to the DRT in it's continuing quest of this mystery.

                                                                               Best Wishes,   Ted     
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on March 02, 2011, 10:00:48 AM
Hi Ted,

what do you mean exactly by "  There have been numerous recent attempts to thwart my investigations "  ?

Don't tell me you are spyed by MIB ?  ;D  or is that true ?   ???

Anyway, i'm still curious regarding your research !

All the best !
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on March 02, 2011, 03:49:14 PM
Hello Ted,

I know you don't know me as I just began posting here at the time you had to 'go dark' due to the unfortunate persecution you stated.

But, I really am compelled you to thank personally for motivating me to begin posting here at droneteam!

I simply repeatedly listened to your audiotape interview with LMH and can only conclude that there is absolutely no sign of deception in your voice that is detectable to the trained ear.

There is a certain quality in your voice that underscores your belief in the reality of your experiences and all the facts you provided in your posts.

I have observed and participated in many forums since the 2007 California Drone sightings and the Isaac Caret LAP affair that tended toward the man-made hoax belief system.

You, friend Ted, offer a completely different data set tangential to the drones, but relate a most compelling story that is backed with a sincerity that is lacking sometimes here but mostly elsewhere.

Although your story might sound fantastic to the untrained observer, an unwavering dedication and use of plain clear language gives credence to your revelations at every turn.

So to you Ted I say 'Thank you' for opening these all too skeptical eyes...and ears!

~P
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 03, 2011, 01:22:07 AM
Hi Ted,

what do you mean exactly by "  There have been numerous recent attempts to thwart my investigations "  ?

Don't tell me you are spyed by MIB ?  ;D  or is that true ?   ???

Anyway, i'm still curious regarding your research !

All the best !
Hi guerande and thanks. Due to legal litigation, i cannot go into detail at this time but will admit there are forces at work who wish this subject to be silenced. MIB??, No, that is just "MOVIE" hype. Since 2007 i have attempted to pursue this mystery in a serious and dedicated manner and will continue to do so, no matter the consequences. I would encourage everyone here to continue the search for an answer but remember to "TRUST NO ONE", "PROTECT YOUR RESOURCES AND INFORMATION", " DOCUMENT EVERYTHING", "CHECK YOUR FACTS", and " NEVER BE INTIMIDATED". I am more certain than ever before that this mystery may be solved through the hard work and perseverance of dedicated people like the ones here in the DRT. Just keep digging and keep the faith.
                                                                                                 Thanks, Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 03, 2011, 01:43:03 AM
Hello Ted,

I know you don't know me as I just began posting here at the time you had to 'go dark' due to the unfortunate persecution you stated.

But, I really am compelled you to thank personally for motivating me to begin posting here at droneteam!

I simply repeatedly listened to your audiotape interview with LMH and can only conclude that there is absolutely no sign of deception in your voice that is detectable to the trained ear.

There is a certain quality in your voice that underscores your belief in the reality of your experiences and all the facts you provided in your posts.

I have observed and participated in many forums since the 2007 California Drone sightings and the Isaac Caret LAP affair that tended toward the man-made hoax belief system.

You, friend Ted, offer a completely different data set tangential to the drones, but relate a most compelling story that is backed with a sincerity that is lacking sometimes here but mostly elsewhere.

Although your story might sound fantastic to the untrained observer, an unwavering dedication and use of plain clear language gives credence to your revelations at every turn.

So to you Ted I say 'Thank you' for opening these all too skeptical eyes...and ears!

~P
Thanks prosopon. I urge you to continue your Search for an ANSWER. It is people like yourself who keep the faith and are willing to go the extra mile who will reap the reward of an answer to this great MYSTERY. And i know it will happen!!!! Keep Digging!!!

                                                                                    Thanks for your support,
                                                                                     And continuing efforts
                                                                                       On the DRT Forum
                           
                                                                                               Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 07, 2011, 06:11:11 PM
Hello Everyone,
I wanted to post an update on my initial meeting with the Professor of Greek History and Ancient Civilizations who has so graciously agreed to help in trying to decipher the meanings of the strange symbols associated with the Drone Mystery. At our initial meeting i presented to him all the photos, references, diagrams, and information i have gathered in my research, including the CARET as well as other documented cases and my own drawings from my personal experience. We discussed at length my theory of a connection with the Greek References and my recent telepathic experience in which apparent Greek phrases and language was used. He was very interested and receptive to all that i related and has assured me that he will investigate and try to find any connections with Greek or other East Mediterranean Civilizations with which he is expert on. He related that it is possible that these symbols and writings could even be a combination of many languages which might also include such languages as Ancient Celtic Runes or even Ancient Chinese Mong Script in conjunction with Greek, Turkish, or other Ancient Languages. I will say, i was very impressed with his knowledge and understanding of my reasons for wanting to resolve this issue. He seemed to exhibit an unbiased opinion toward the Drone Mystery as i explained it to him. He said that he would neither believe or disbelieve this subject, only try to find any connection and an understandable meaning for these strange symbols and writings. I will continue to post updates as this investigation progresses and i have new information to share.

                                                                                     Best Wishes to ALL,
                                                                                              Ted     
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on March 07, 2011, 10:11:28 PM
You may know of our group's interest in the Drone Saga and our participation in one of its more infamous episodes.  We can only say that you might consider that we had a reason in choosing Birmingham Alabama.  It will be of interest to us to hear more of your experience, we have had a lot of experience too and understand the necessity of being careful.  Good luck in your endeavors.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on March 08, 2011, 11:29:08 PM
Hi Ted,

Welcome back!

I am very interested in hearing what your conversation with the professor you contacted has to say in this Drone case. Remember that the "language" of the LAP might be "maschine Code"...and not a spoken language...

As for your telepathic message, it sure is realavant to ask for known phrases that you recall...as it might be showing at least some interpretable language!

Great to know you are following this up! Good work! Looking forward to hear more..

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 09, 2011, 12:04:54 AM
Hi Ted,

Welcome back!

I am very interested in hearing what your conversation with the professor you contacted has to say in this Drone case. Remember that the "language" of the LAP might be "maschine Code"...and not a spoken language...

As for your telepathic message, it sure is realavant to ask for known phrases that you recall...as it might be showing at least some interpretable language!

Great to know you are following this up! Good work! Looking forward to hear more..

EVS
Thanks EVS, Yes, i explained to the professor the theory that these symbols may have a "Function" rather than expressing a message or being parts of a written language as we know it. He was quite fascinated with this theory and mentioned that it is also a theory in some ancient languages and expressive symbols used by ancient civilizations. I also gave him copies of the documentation of my own experiences and the internet links to all the Drone related material that i have examined since 2007. I am waiting in excited anticipation for some results soon. I certainly feel that this might turn up something that we may be able to use to further our investigations of this mystery. Everyone keep your fingers crossed and lets hope for the best.

                                                                                               Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 19, 2011, 10:26:44 PM
Hi Ted,

Welcome back!

I am very interested in hearing what your conversation with the professor you contacted has to say in this Drone case. Remember that the "language" of the LAP might be "maschine Code"...and not a spoken language...

As for your telepathic message, it sure is realavant to ask for known phrases that you recall...as it might be showing at least some interpretable language!

Great to know you are following this up! Good work! Looking forward to hear more..

EVS
Thanks EVS, Yes, i explained to the professor the theory that these symbols may have a "Function" rather than expressing a message or being parts of a written language as we know it. He was quite fascinated with this theory and mentioned that it is also a theory in some ancient languages and expressive symbols used by ancient civilizations. I also gave him copies of the documentation of my own experiences and the internet links to all the Drone related material that i have examined since 2007. I am waiting in excited anticipation for some results soon. I certainly feel that this might turn up something that we may be able to use to further our investigations of this mystery. Everyone keep your fingers crossed and lets hope for the best.

                                                                                               Ted
I received this bit of info from the professor who is currently working on the meaning and origin of the LAP and CARET symbols and writings.
http://cacm.acm.org/ (http://cacm.acm.org/)
Please pay close attention to the Video and Diagrams in relationship to some of the documented drawings that have been posted in regards to the LAP and CARET Documents.
Seems to be some familiar looking things here that may have some bearing on the Drone Saga or not. But interesting all the same.

                                                                                           Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 19, 2011, 11:09:25 PM
Hi Ted,

Welcome back!

I am very interested in hearing what your conversation with the professor you contacted has to say in this Drone case. Remember that the "language" of the LAP might be "maschine Code"...and not a spoken language...

As for your telepathic message, it sure is realavant to ask for known phrases that you recall...as it might be showing at least some interpretable language!

Great to know you are following this up! Good work! Looking forward to hear more..

EVS
Thanks EVS, Yes, i explained to the professor the theory that these symbols may have a "Function" rather than expressing a message or being parts of a written language as we know it. He was quite fascinated with this theory and mentioned that it is also a theory in some ancient languages and expressive symbols used by ancient civilizations. I also gave him copies of the documentation of my own experiences and the internet links to all the Drone related material that i have examined since 2007. I am waiting in excited anticipation for some results soon. I certainly feel that this might turn up something that we may be able to use to further our investigations of this mystery. Everyone keep your fingers crossed and lets hope for the best.

                                                                                               Ted
I received this bit of info from the professor who is currently working on the meaning and origin of the LAP and CARET symbols and writings.
http://cacm.acm.org/ (http://cacm.acm.org/)
Please pay close attention to the Video and Diagrams in relationship to some of the documented drawings that have been posted in regards to the LAP and CARET Documents.
Seems to be some familiar looking things here that may have some bearing on the Drone Saga or not. But interesting all the same.

                                                                                           Ted
In addition, the Professor seems to feel that these are more Mathematical in nature rather than Cultural. He is consulting with a fellow Mathematical Scholar who may also be able to help with further information. He is also continuing to follow the Cultural avenue in regards to these writings and symbols. Will pass the info as soon as i have any further.

                                                                                            Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on March 19, 2011, 11:49:16 PM
I received this bit of info from the professor who is currently working on the meaning and origin of the LAP and CARET symbols and writings.
http://cacm.acm.org/ (http://cacm.acm.org/)
Please pay close attention to the Video and Diagrams in relationship to some of the documented drawings that have been posted in regards to the LAP and CARET Documents.
Seems to be some familiar looking things here that may have some bearing on the Drone Saga or not. But interesting all the same.

                                                                                           Ted

Thank you for keeping us informed and for keeping the professor interested in studying this case!

There have been other similarities noted in the past with overlapping and connected circles in drawings presented around 2007. Could it be Synchronicity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity)? Or could they have been inspired from the original work?

I also found something in December 2008 in a then recently updated Netbeans programming environment:

(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm106/onthefence55/NetbeansLogo.jpg)

There are many interesting stories of synchronicity, statusticians can dismiss it with something called selection bias (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias).
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on March 20, 2011, 02:02:42 AM
We have seen the influence of the LAP with many designs and realized that this influence is wide spread among designers.  There are those who have sought to tell all that the Drone case is known by just a few, but we do not find that so.  There was one at the very beginning of this saga who succeeded in derailing serious pursuit by claiming to have shown that the Drones could be exactly copied by CG.  They never have been.  If you think otherwise look at his work and they are anything but exact copies, at best they are simple facsimiles catering to willing skeptics.  We can show an extremely detailed Drone that in no way captures the realism of the Big Basin Drone.  The case has been attacked by a deluxe know-it-all who put up a blog saying complete hoax when there is no proof of such.  This is a very clever fellow who reckons himself an "expert" by very subtle manipulation of the posters he moderates.  We believe there is something still hidden in the Drone event and have some clues as to what, but will wait and see what comes as we pursue our own agenda.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on March 20, 2011, 03:23:06 AM
"We believe there is something still hidden in the Drone event and have some clues as to what, but will wait and see what comes as we pursue our own agenda."
L E V I A T H A N

The LEVs are correct in his/their postulation in this case.

I am aware of several serious researchers who believe this also.

~P

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on March 20, 2011, 04:23:37 AM
Hi Ted,

Welcome back!

I am very interested in hearing what your conversation with the professor you contacted has to say in this Drone case. Remember that the "language" of the LAP might be "maschine Code"...and not a spoken language...

As for your telepathic message, it sure is realavant to ask for known phrases that you recall...as it might be showing at least some interpretable language!

Great to know you are following this up! Good work! Looking forward to hear more..

EVS
Thanks EVS, Yes, i explained to the professor the theory that these symbols may have a "Function" rather than expressing a message or being parts of a written language as we know it. He was quite fascinated with this theory and mentioned that it is also a theory in some ancient languages and expressive symbols used by ancient civilizations. I also gave him copies of the documentation of my own experiences and the internet links to all the Drone related material that i have examined since 2007. I am waiting in excited anticipation for some results soon. I certainly feel that this might turn up something that we may be able to use to further our investigations of this mystery. Everyone keep your fingers crossed and lets hope for the best.

                                                                                               Ted
I received this bit of info from the professor who is currently working on the meaning and origin of the LAP and CARET symbols and writings.
http://cacm.acm.org/ (http://cacm.acm.org/)
Please pay close attention to the Video and Diagrams in relationship to some of the documented drawings that have been posted in regards to the LAP and CARET Documents.
Seems to be some familiar looking things here that may have some bearing on the Drone Saga or not. But interesting all the same.

                                                                                           Ted
In addition, the Professor seems to feel that these are more Mathematical in nature rather than Cultural. He is consulting with a fellow Mathematical Scholar who may also be able to help with further information. He is also continuing to follow the Cultural avenue in regards to these writings and symbols. Will pass the info as soon as i have any further.

                                                                                            Ted

Hi Ted,

I am still following your outstanding work in co-operation with the professor...

I'm pleased that he follow up on the possibility that the "signs" have mathematical values.

Please keep us informed on this issue..

EVS

PS: I'm still here, just not posting in "Vonstern Magazine" thread...as my close friend who is close to dying from cancer takes up all my time...just so you know...I'll be back again later, as I still believe this case is unsolved.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on March 20, 2011, 04:40:05 AM
Hi Ted,

Welcome back!

I am very interested in hearing what your conversation with the professor you contacted has to say in this Drone case. Remember that the "language" of the LAP might be "maschine Code"...and not a spoken language...

As for your telepathic message, it sure is realavant to ask for known phrases that you recall...as it might be showing at least some interpretable language!

Great to know you are following this up! Good work! Looking forward to hear more..

EVS
Thanks EVS, Yes, i explained to the professor the theory that these symbols may have a "Function" rather than expressing a message or being parts of a written language as we know it. He was quite fascinated with this theory and mentioned that it is also a theory in some ancient languages and expressive symbols used by ancient civilizations. I also gave him copies of the documentation of my own experiences and the internet links to all the Drone related material that i have examined since 2007. I am waiting in excited anticipation for some results soon. I certainly feel that this might turn up something that we may be able to use to further our investigations of this mystery. Everyone keep your fingers crossed and lets hope for the best.

                                                                                               Ted
I received this bit of info from the professor who is currently working on the meaning and origin of the LAP and CARET symbols and writings.
http://cacm.acm.org/ (http://cacm.acm.org/)
Please pay close attention to the Video and Diagrams in relationship to some of the documented drawings that have been posted in regards to the LAP and CARET Documents.
Seems to be some familiar looking things here that may have some bearing on the Drone Saga or not. But interesting all the same.

                                                                                           Ted
In addition, the Professor seems to feel that these are more Mathematical in nature rather than Cultural. He is consulting with a fellow Mathematical Scholar who may also be able to help with further information. He is also continuing to follow the Cultural avenue in regards to these writings and symbols. Will pass the info as soon as i have any further.

                                                                                            Ted

Hi Ted,

I am still following your outstanding work in co-operation with the professor...

I'm pleased that he follow up on the possibility that the "signs" have mathematical values.

Please keep us informed on this issue..

EVS

PS: I'm still here, just not posting in "Vonstern Magazine" thread...as my close friend who is close to dying from cancer takes up all my time...just so you know...I'll be back again later, as I still believe this case is unsolved.
Thanks EVS. Glad you will stay on and all the best wishes & Prayers to your close friend. Spring Break has just begun and the Professor now has a couple of weeks of free time to spend on this, so he has jumped in with both feet to get as much accomplished as possible before the semester continues. I spoke with him by phone again today and expressed our appreciation for his efforts in this matter.

                                                                                               Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Douglas on March 20, 2011, 12:07:11 PM
Hi Erik:
Sad to hear of your friend.  Your dedication at this time is noble and good.
Post when you have time.
Douglas
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on April 06, 2011, 04:25:36 PM
Hi Everyone;

Here is an update on the Research being done on the LAP and CARET Symbols by the Professor of Languages who has agreed to help with our research.

I spoke by phone with him last night, and He doesn't have anything earth shaking as of yet. He has run all the samples of the Symbols i sent through a database of known existing and primitive languages and came up with 2 examples that were similar in style but lacked any exact matches. The first was an ancient Chinese Script that dates back to 4th century AD. The next closest match was a French Symbol Code used by the Knights Templar during their persecution and up until their ultimate demise. The professor stated that styles have similarities to the Drone Symbols, but lack any positive points that can be connected for sure. He is going to send the breakdown of these to me as soon as he can produce an understandable diagram. I will Post this here on the forum as soon as he sends it to me. He is now shifting to the possibility of a Mathematical Machine Language possibility and is going to explore that avenue using the same system of database elimination. He said he would let me know as soon as this is completed. He stated that this will take considerably more time due to the complex nature of the existing Languages. That's all for now, but he has promised to keep digging.
                                                                                                  Ted     
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on April 07, 2011, 12:07:41 AM
Excellent update Ted.

Thank you.

~P
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on April 08, 2011, 01:24:40 PM
Hi Ted !

Very good indeed - hope that will be of some use for
the drone mystery !

All the best !
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 24, 2011, 01:21:58 AM
Ted,

I think it is important to show a re-enactment of your telepathic experience (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=34.msg7586#msg7586). I would be willing to try and animate that and would like to openly get your input in hopes that others can ask the questions that I have missed.

I'll start with a few things that I'm not clear on.

1. When you called out to ask "I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? ..." , were you yelling loudly or speaking softly, and were your eyes open or closed?

2. You said that "Each message was a full statement that appeared in my mind as Black Letters printed on a Dark Silver Background." Can you explain if the letters scrolled away, or were presented as pages, or one line at a time, or something else.

3. In an email message to me, you explained that the image dynamically changed in brightness. Could you explain that in more detail and if the text brightness also changed along with the background.

4. Was the font of the text familiar to you?

Thank you
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 24, 2011, 01:52:23 AM
Ted,

I think it is important to show a re-enactment of your telepathic experience (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=34.msg7586#msg7586). I would be willing to try and animate that and would like to openly get your input in hopes that others can ask the questions that I have missed.

I'll start with a few things that I'm not clear on.

1. When you called out to ask "I HAVE RETURNED, ARE YOU HERE? ..." , were you yelling loudly or speaking softly, and were your eyes open or closed?

2. You said that "Each message was a full statement that appeared in my mind as Black Letters printed on a Dark Silver Background." Can you explain if the letters scrolled away, or were presented as pages, or one line at a time, or something else.

3. In an email message to me, you explained that the image dynamically changed in brightness. Could you explain that in more detail and if the text brightness also changed along with the background.

4. Was the font of the text familiar to you?

Thank you
Thanks, OTF, Gladly

1. When i called out " I have returned, are you here ?", it was in a loud voice. Somewhere between a loud shout and a yell.

2. Each sentence was presented as one line at a time that faded out and was replaced with the next sentence.

3. The Writing as well as the background faded out and in together. Fading out to White and reappearing white and fading in to black script on silver metallic background

 4. The closest Font i can relate this to would be Bold Ariel or something very close maybe around 12 to 16 point.

Thanks, Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 24, 2011, 02:02:56 AM
Perfect, thanks. I'll start working on something.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 24, 2011, 02:32:59 AM
2. Each sentence was presented as one line at a time that faded out and was replaced with the next sentence.

That reminds me of a speed reading demo I saw years ago where one line is presented at a time. Here is an example of that demo where you can select very fast rates for practicing:

http://www.mrkent.com/speedread/ (http://www.mrkent.com/speedread/)

This brings me to another question. Were the sentences presented to you at a rate like in the above example, or was time even a factor, or something else?

If it was at a specific rate, please try the example above to identify how many words per minute you saw.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 24, 2011, 02:35:57 AM
Perfect, thanks. I'll start working on something.
Thanks OTF, The "Telepathic Message" was a very important element of my entire experience and might help to provide new clues to the Drone Mystery.

                                                                                                       Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 24, 2011, 02:46:40 AM
2. Each sentence was presented as one line at a time that faded out and was replaced with the next sentence.

That reminds me of a speed reading demo I saw years ago where one line is presented at a time. Here is an example of that demo where you can select very fast rates for practicing:

http://www.mrkent.com/speedread/ (http://www.mrkent.com/speedread/)

This brings me to another question. Were the sentences presented to you at a rate like in the above example, or was time even a factor, or something else?

If it was at a specific rate, please try the example above to identify how many words per minute you saw.
From fade in to fade out, the visual time of each sentence was about 10 to 15 seconds with the fading phase taking about 1 to 3 seconds of the total time. As i have related before, it was as if it were downloaded into my memory and when i composed my OMG Document, i was able to type it out on my computer without any pauses. This is unusual in that i have always paused to collect my thoughts between sentences before i write or type anything.
                                                                                                              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 26, 2011, 04:03:49 PM
From fade in to fade out, the visual time of each sentence was about 10 to 15 seconds with the fading phase taking about 1 to 3 seconds of the total time. As i have related before, it was as if it were downloaded into my memory and when i composed my OMG Document, i was able to type it out on my computer without any pauses. This is unusual in that i have always paused to collect my thoughts between sentences before i write or type anything.
                                                                                                              Ted
Thank you for your descriptions. I have put together a preliminary slide-show type video with the first few lines of your experience. I hope you can see this file OK. The format can be changed if necessary:
  http://droneteam.com/images/ted/omgexperience.vob (http://droneteam.com/images/ted/omgexperience.vob)

Please check/comment on some of the following which I have made assumptions for:
 - Darkness of background (brushed aluminium). Is it too dark?
 - Timing of fade in/out and message timing.
 - Shape and size of lettering.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 26, 2011, 04:55:22 PM
Thanks, OTF. Great Work


 - Darkness of background (brushed aluminium). Is it too dark?  The brightness is right. The contrast of the metallic background was more solid less stringy
.
 - Timing of fade in/out and message timing.  The sync of the fade should be the same for the writing and the background. Fading in and out to white at the same time.

 - Shape and size of lettering. The Font should be a couple of points smaller.

The basic idea and overall timing of the transition are very good.

                                                                                              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 26, 2011, 05:00:46 PM
Thanks, OTF. Great Work


 - Darkness of background (brushed aluminium). Is it too dark?  The brightness is right. The contrast of the metallic background was more solid less stringy
.
 - Timing of fade in/out and message timing.  The sync of the fade should be the same for the writing and the background. Fading in and out to white at the same time.

 - Shape and size of lettering. The Font should be a couple of points smaller.

The basic idea and overall timing of the transition are very good.

                                                                                              Ted
Also for anyone having trouble playing it. I got it to play fine with Windows Media Player. Just OPEN WITH your WMP.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 27, 2011, 02:31:50 AM
- The sync of the fade should be the same for the writing and the background. Fading in and out to white at the same time.

Thank you for the feedback!

The fade-in/out is a bit of an optical illusion because they do actually fade at the same time and the black lettering is overpowering. I know what you mean though it looks out-of-sync, so I'll try something else to make it appear synchronized.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 30, 2011, 06:39:50 PM
- Darkness of background (brushed aluminium). Is it too dark?  The brightness is right. The contrast of the metallic background was more solid less stringy
.
 - Timing of fade in/out and message timing.  The sync of the fade should be the same for the writing and the background. Fading in and out to white at the same time.

 - Shape and size of lettering. The Font should be a couple of points smaller.
I worked on the fade and realized that most video editors simply adjust transparency during fading which results in inconsistent detail perception as the transition is being made. I had to write my own fade algorithm to adjust the contrast along with transparency. I'm still not sure if it is close to your recollection, let me know.

The fonts may appear a little smaller as you requested because of the aspect ratio adjustment.

telepathic re-creation preliminary (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScRS8vjj-iA#ws)

Next question; Some of the sentences from your experience are quite long, fitting them onto the screen in one line would appear cramped. Do you recall if they were broken into separate lines? For example this one:
The Vessel is an information probe that enables us to understand your environment. Our native environment is unlike yours, so we wish to learn so that we might be able to function in your environment. We are able to create a TEAR in what you perceive as Time and Space in order to travel great distances for our research. We repair the tear when we return to our own planet.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 30, 2011, 08:05:00 PM
Thanks, OTF

This is a better interpretation, but still lacks the actual reality of the experience. Imagine that you are in a fully lighted room, looking at a poster on the wall. Now imagine the lights are on a dimmer switch and have someone take them from full bright to total dark using the dimmer switch in a time frame in about 3 seconds. The only difference in my experience was a fade to white instead of a fade to black. This is much similar to what happens if you have ever experienced "Blacking Out" due to some physical problem or loss of oxygen to the brain. Every thing fades in Sync.

To answer the question of sentence length. I do not recall any extension of the message background or decrease in the font size of the message to compensate for the length of the text statement during my experience. The message did not seem to change size, scroll, or expand or decrease during the experience.

Thanks for continuing to help bring this to life.
                                                                                                              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 31, 2011, 03:24:17 AM
This is a better interpretation, but still lacks the actual reality of the experience. Imagine that you are in a fully lighted room, looking at a poster on the wall. Now imagine the lights are on a dimmer switch and have someone take them from full bright to total dark using the dimmer switch in a time frame in about 3 seconds. The only difference in my experience was a fade to white instead of a fade to black. This is much similar to what happens if you have ever experienced "Blacking Out" due to some physical problem or loss of oxygen to the brain. Every thing fades in Sync.

To answer the question of sentence length. I do not recall any extension of the message background or decrease in the font size of the message to compensate for the length of the text statement during my experience. The message did not seem to change size, scroll, or expand or decrease during the experience.

I'm not sure I completely understand, but I added some blur to the fading and I think it might be more as you described. Maybe the timing is off, let me know to shorten or lengthen if necessary:

final (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a5UF1m-FxQ#ws)


How is this image for a long sentence, I just took your sentence and split it into three lines and centered:

(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm106/onthefence55/THREELINE.png)

Thanks!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on May 31, 2011, 06:01:22 AM
Very Close !!!  Great Work!! 

That captures what i saw very closely.

Thank you OTF
                                                                                                           Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on May 31, 2011, 10:45:21 PM
Hi Ted,

Thank you for your perseverance into helping me/us understand this case!

Here is the complete text at almost 8 minutes:
Ted Connors OMG telepathic experience (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJTUZkarN2M#ws)

It is all done with programmed coding so it is very easy to change anything that you think requires modification from your recollection.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 01, 2011, 12:16:41 AM
OTF, Thank you for this presentation. It tells the story of my experience in the detail in which it occurred. I hope that it will help in further understanding of the Drone Craft mystery. I was recently asked, " Did this really happen? or were you having delusions or just imagining this event?" I  answered in this way. I have a happy and productive life and a wonderful rewarding career. Many close friends and relatives who respect and trust me. I enjoy my hobbies of sports and music and am active in my community. I am an ordinary person who experienced two extraordinary unexplained events in my life for which i am seeking an answer. I am not obsessed or immersed in the subject of Aliens, Extraterrestrial Visitation, Time Travel, or Mind Control. But when confronted with the reality of my experiences, i feel it necessary to find out why it happened and who is responsible. If it had happened to only myself and not many others, as it has. I would still search for an answer, if only for my own peace of mind. But since the Drone Craft Sightings include many more witnesses as well as so many dedicated researchers such as those here at the DRT forum, i feel an obligation and a duty to give the details of my experiences in the hope that an answer can be found. I encourage EVERYONE here on this forum to continue with that search and i encourage the Witnesses to come forward, tell of their experiences and become an active participant in what might be one of the greatest discoveries of mankind. Together i believe we can solve this great mystery and find the truth of the DRONE CRAFT PHENOMENA.

                                                                                         Thanks, Ted   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 01, 2011, 12:41:08 AM
Hi Ted,

Thank you for your perseverance into helping me/us understand this case!

It is all done with programmed coding so it is very easy to change anything that you think requires modification from your recollection.

Very interesting message!

I must say, that the people of Ethos have a serious health
problem if they have to use an entire moon for quarantine!

Well, this may not come as a surprise, these beings, let's call
them that for the moment, might be of a slightly diffuse species.

As I've studied this case, even though only superficial, it has
some pre-historic lines, that goes way back in the history of this
planet we call our home, the Earth.

Perhaps some of the historical thinkers recieved a message from the
people of Oltissis in just the same manner? I am not convinced that
this did not take place.

 
  *Ethos:  "A Greek word meaning "character" that is used to describe the guiding beliefs or ideals that characterize a community,   nation, or ideology. The Greeks also used this word to refer to the power of music to influence its hearer's emotions, behaviors, and even morals.[1] Early Greek stories of Orpheus exhibit this idea in a compelling way. The word's use in rhetoric is closely based on the Greek terminology used by Aristotle in his concept of the three artistic proofs."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos)


An overview of the philosopher Aristotle:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle)

As these beings might use rhetoric, should be of no surprise, as
they might be living in an etheric world, according to the FBI sediment,
describing "the visitors". (See The FBI UFO FILES topic)

They might live in symbiosis with our world, but apparently can't survive
in our "physical" world, at least not yet. (why this reminds me of a science-fiction
movie I have watched some time ago, I really don't know?)

The thought that these beings dwell in the same yet different world as ours, is quite
imaginative, I must admit. But they might be the "Interdimensional" beings that is
told about in many places of the 'Net, even in science.

I can't say this is what was/is going on, but it sure makes one think a bit "out of the box"!

Just my opinion, very good work,

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 01, 2011, 01:19:40 AM
Very interesting message!

I must say, that the people of Ethos have a serious health
problem if they have to use an entire moon for quarantine!

Well, this may not come as a surprise, these beings, let's call
them that for the moment, might be of a slightly diffuse species.

As I've studied this case, even though only superficial, it has
some pre-historic lines, that goes way back in the history of this
planet we call our home, the Earth.

Perhaps some of the historical thinkers recieved a message from the
people of Oltissis in just the same manner? I am not convinced that
this did not take place.

 
  *Ethos:  "A Greek word meaning "character" that is used to describe the guiding beliefs or ideals that characterize a community,   nation, or ideology. The Greeks also used this word to refer to the power of music to influence its hearer's emotions, behaviors, and even morals.[1] Early Greek stories of Orpheus exhibit this idea in a compelling way. The word's use in rhetoric is closely based on the Greek terminology used by Aristotle in his concept of the three artistic proofs."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos)


An overview of the philosopher Aristotle:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle)

As these beings might use rhetoric, should be of no surprise, as
they might be living in an etheric world, according to the FBI sediment,
describing "the visitors". (See The FBI UFO FILES topic)

They might live in symbiosis with our world, but apparently can't survive
in our "physical" world, at least not yet. (why this reminds me of a science-fiction
movie I have watched some time ago, I really don't know?)

The thought that these beings dwell in the same yet different world as ours, is quite
imaginative, I must admit. But they might be the "Interdimensional" beings that is
told about in many places of the 'Net, even in science.

I can't say this is what was/is going on, but it sure makes one think a bit "out of the box"!

Just my opinion, very good work,

EVS
Thanks EVS, Great observations and info. Yes, I believe the Greek Connection is an integral part of this mystery. It has taken a front seat in my own investigation into my experience as well as the Drone Craft subject in general. Stay tuned, because in the near future their could be some earth shattering developments in this area. In my message, i took the term ETHOS to mean "All Encompassing" or Universal Existence" of all life forms anywhere. It is interesting to note also that our word "ETHICS" is derived from the Greek word ETHOS. Is mankind ETHICAL? Should we worry?  Food for thought !!!!!
     
                                                                                                   Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on June 07, 2011, 02:59:55 PM
Just as an aside, the #23 has mystical meaning.  You might want to check it out.  We are still having fun at UFOCB.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 22, 2011, 03:11:18 PM
Linda Moulton-Howe has interviewed drone eye-witness Ted Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors) (ominoustruth (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=34.msg7033#msg7033) on this forum) for an upcoming Earthfiles (http://www.earthfiles.com/) report to be presented on June 25, 2011 (the 4 year anniversary of Ted's sighting).

The audio interview will also be broadcast on Coast to Coast AM (http://coasttocoastam.com/) on June 30, 2011.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 23, 2011, 01:44:02 AM
Linda Moulton-Howe has interviewed drone eye-witness Ted Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors) (ominoustruth (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=34.msg7033#msg7033) on this forum) for an upcoming Earthfiles (http://www.earthfiles.com/) report to be presented on June 25, 2011 (the 4 year anniversary of Ted's sighting).

The audio interview will also be broadcast on Coast to Coast AM (http://coasttocoastam.com/) on June 30, 2011.
Thanks OTF for posting this schedule of my upcoming interviews with Linda Moulton Howe on Earthfiles and Coast To Coast. I want to thank all of the members of the DRT Forum for their hard work and continued Research of the Drone Craft Mystery. I hope that all of you will listen to the interviews and that the information that i reveal will help in some way to understand this great mystery and provide a better understanding of my own experiences since 2007. I ask that everyone keep an open mind and listen closely to the connections discussed in the interviews. I did not go into the details of the nomenclature of the Drone Craft's Propulsion, Design, or Charicteristics. There are many here on the DRT Forum who are so much better informed on these subjects and have researched this area in great detail. I still can't fully comprehend the Nuts and Bolts aspects of these amazing craft. I have read the existing CARET documents, but my focus has been mostly on my experiences and the experiences of the other documented eyewitnesses. I hope that these interviews will help in the discovery of the Origin and Purpose of these craft and how i feel that it is connected to our own Civilization and Origins. I don't understand why i was chosen to witness this craft or why i received the "Oltissis" message. I only know that in my mind and heart, it is of great importance to all Mankind ,the future of our Civilization, and the ability to communicate and interact with these beings from another WORLD or another DIMENSION for the benefit  of both our Cultures. There have been many roadblocks in my quest for an answer, which you will discover in listening to these interviews. We cannot and will not be deterred by POWERS here on this Earth that would block our quest for the truth because of their POWER and GREED to rule over us and keep the TRUTH from us. I encourage EVERYONE to keep looking. YES, "THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE"!!!!!!!!

                                                                                            Thanks, Ted Connors
                                                 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on June 23, 2011, 11:06:25 PM
Hi Ted, making this interview is simply great in my eyes! And that you focused on your experience is the right way to go..
How your experience was accomplished is quite an open question, and I'm sure the "experts" will run it through thoroughly!

To have the courage to explain the experience you had in detail in an interview like this takes tremendous bravery, and it only
shows that you are willing to stand upto it, and that adds even more credibility to your story.

Simply great, and I'm looking forward to listen to it, as I'm sure many are...

Cheers,
EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on June 24, 2011, 01:49:15 AM
Hi Ted, making this interview is simply great in my eyes! And that you focused on your experience is the right way to go..
How your experience was accomplished is quite an open question, and I'm sure the "experts" will run it through thoroughly!

To have the courage to explain the experience you had in detail in an interview like this takes tremendous bravery, and it only
shows that you are willing to stand upto it, and that adds even more credibility to your story.

Simply great, and I'm looking forward to listen to it, as I'm sure many are...

Cheers,
EVS
Thanks EVS. I am sure we are close to an ANSWER. Very CLOSE !!!! Those who are afraid of our knowing the TRUTH are running for cover now. We must keep digging !!!!!

                                                                                              Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on June 28, 2011, 03:53:04 PM
Linda Moulton-Howe has interviewed drone eye-witness Ted Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors) (ominoustruth (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=34.msg7033#msg7033) on this forum) for an upcoming Earthfiles (http://www.earthfiles.com/) report to be presented on June 25, 2011 (the 4 year anniversary of Ted's sighting).

The audio interview will also be broadcast on Coast to Coast AM (http://coasttocoastam.com/) on June 30, 2011.



Apparently the interview(s) was/were already broadcast on EARTHFILES on the 25th, and that is subscription only, yes?

So nobody here has a paid LMH EARTHFILES subscription?

Anybody listenen?

And no immediate comment here or elsewhere?

Or does copyright prevent such things?

Curious, perhaps.

~P
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 28, 2011, 04:28:34 PM
Apparently the interview(s) was/were already broadcast on EARTHFILES on the 25th, and that is subscription only, yes?

I think that was a mistake, only the announcement was made on the 25th, the audio will be on the radio on the 30th.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: Prosopon on June 28, 2011, 05:01:13 PM
Linda Moulton-Howe has interviewed drone eye-witness Ted Connors (http://droneteam.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ted_Connors) (ominoustruth (http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=34.msg7033#msg7033) on this forum) for an upcoming Earthfiles (http://www.earthfiles.com/) report to be presented on June 25, 2011 (the 4 year anniversary of Ted's sighting).

The audio interview will also be broadcast on Coast to Coast AM (http://coasttocoastam.com/) on June 30, 2011.



Sorry about that OTF, but I just followed what you said (see above) and now you are clarifying it as a mistake, yes?

Only one interview day, June 30th, but in two parts (two reports) on the same night? or different nights as it is in two parts?

On the EARTHFILES website, that is the correct date and
breakdown from what looks like a two-part interview on the drones.

Thanks for helping clear that up!

~P
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on June 28, 2011, 05:17:38 PM
Sorry about that OTF, but I just followed what you said (see above) and now you are clarifying it as a mistake, yes?

Only one interview day, June 30th, but in two parts (two reports) on the same night? or different nights as it is in two parts?

On the EARTHFILES website, that is the correct date and breakdown from what looks like a two-part interview on the drones.

Yes.

I suppose two parts means that is likely two have a commercial in between, but who knows. The tension is building ...  8) . You are getting me more excited to hear it.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on June 28, 2011, 07:31:22 PM
It will be very interesting to see how the D'sDs at UFOCB will chew this up.  Prosopon, you should visit there sometime you might enjoy the humor/ridicule thread.  I will never post on any thread moderated by D again.  Since I have learned what I have learned it is a complete waist of time.  I have been fortunate to learn a lot.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on July 01, 2011, 04:19:22 PM
In case you missed the radio program and interview with Ted Connors, Linda Moulton-How has transcribed her entire audio portion here:

http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1870 (http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1870)
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1871 (http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1871)

The audio is available to Coast to Coast AM members here:
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/06/30 (http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/06/30)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on July 05, 2011, 04:48:17 PM
Quote
Apparently the interview(s) was/were already broadcast on EARTHFILES on the 25th, and that is subscription only, yes?

So nobody here has a paid LMH EARTHFILES subscription?

Anybody listenen?

And no immediate comment here or elsewhere?

Or does copyright prevent such things?

Curious, perhaps.


Oh yes I listened Prosopon, you see we always have a plan or agenda.  You might keep in mind that anticipation allows one to be prepared and have others in waiting.  Now it would be foolish to exhibit the same personality if one has to use other methods, addresses, etc.  I am sure you know the game goes on, so sit back and enjoy.  There is much to come.
L E V I A T H A N

Fix quote box
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on September 09, 2011, 11:25:03 PM
Possibly a link between telepathy and "fields", here is an interesting (and controversial) new study which claims that a magnetic field may affect thoughts:

Magnetic Pulses to the Brain Make it Impossible to Lie: Study (http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/211122/20110909/magnetic-pulses-to-the-brain-make-it-impossible-to-lie.htm)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on September 10, 2011, 12:40:48 AM
Just an additional link to sustain the above stated study:

http://medgadget.com/2010/04/magnetic_fields_used_to_disrupt_moral_thought.html (http://medgadget.com/2010/04/magnetic_fields_used_to_disrupt_moral_thought.html)

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on September 10, 2011, 01:38:03 AM
"ANSWERS"

The Dawn Breaks Clear In My Mind

An Urgent Message For All Mankind

Not Sure How Or Why

A Vivid Image Lights The Sky

A Hundred Questions Flood My Brain

From A Distant Place With A Grecian Name

My Mind Is Racing To And Fro

So Many Things I Want To Know

What Do You Seek? Was The Minds Refrain

The Message Rolls Like A Speeding Train

How Can I Hope To Understand?

This Urgent Message From From A Distant Land

I Am Only A Mortal From The Planet Earth

Only The Result Of A Human Birth

We Will Help You And Your Kind

In A Manner That You Shall Find

An Answer To All Your Questions Given, In What You Call Time

A Message Given

A Message Received

The Truth Will Come and The Message Believed


 
For Everyone At DRT
Ted Connors - September 2011
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: onthefence on September 10, 2011, 01:47:23 AM
Very nice! Thanks for sharing your artistic side.

Next step ... are you going to set that to music?  ;)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on September 10, 2011, 03:07:52 AM
Very nice! Thanks for sharing your artistic side.

Next step ... are you going to set that to music?  ;)
Thanks OTF.  I am not sure about having an artistic side when it comes to prose and poetry. I have never been one to have a flair for that sort of thing. Since my Telepathic Message Experience, anything like this that comes to me in regards to this subject in any mental form, i try to document in writing and pass on. Not sure why, just fells like the thing to do. Sometimes  i have to wonder who is in the "Pilots Seat" when i get these impulses, lol. As far as Music is concerned, that is where i have been blessed with some talent. I am not sure anything i might write to accompany this could be of any help in its understanding or add anything to it. It is odd that since my 2010 experience my interests and ability in other artistic areas have increased a great deal. Not sure what it all means. Maybe an added bonus of some sort to my interaction and contact with these beings, who knows? Now, if i could get my fingers to hit all the right keyboard keys, that would be a world shattering accomplishment.

                                                                                                                                Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 09, 2011, 12:11:59 AM
It Warms the heart of this recently enlightened human that so many minds are opening to the Truths, Realities, and Possibilities of this subject with the intent of unlocking the many aspects of this great mystery. One has to but look around at the current condition of affairs in our world and the chaos taking place to know and understand that the return of the Great Fathers of our species is imminent. A great change is now on the wind and will soon refresh and replenish the spirit of all mankind. After much contemplation and soul searching, i have now finally come to realize the full meaning of the message i was given and the reasons for all the small bits and pieces that have been presented and the purpose behind why it has been given to us in this fashion. Each of us, every Man, Woman, and Child must find the answer for themselves before all of us can even begin to understand and be aware of the changes to come. The return is near and that dawn will break with such amazing and astonishing results as we as a species could never imagine.
Look to the Skies !!! Listen to your Hearts !!!  Open your Minds!! and know that this Drone Saga was just one of the small bits and pieces of a much larger puzzle that is to bring a new day to our Planet and our Species. Be at peace with all this and your questions will surely be answered as mine have.

                                                                                                                                   Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: tomi on October 09, 2011, 07:16:54 AM
What return is near?  What is enlightenment?  Why does the human race have to relearn every fricking lesson every 3 generations?   Why?   

You can not have 3 or 4% economic growth every year, population growth etc. It becomes eponential.  Back in the 80's some people were saying that including myself and I'm not a beacon of brightness.  Just common sense said that and a look at a chart.  But no......... what do we get.. politicians spewing what humans want to hear and humans believing what they are told. 

Like now.. everyone is going on about "inflation".  How can you have inflation when 47 TRILLION dollars of fiat money went "poof" 3 years ago?   The only inflation we see is in our energy bills as we all get railroaded into an international version of the whole Enron debacle because they are playing with energy futures now on a global scale.

Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: tomi on October 09, 2011, 07:32:10 AM
So.. I don't know what return you are speaking about Ted.  If you think "aliens" are going to come back and magically we will cataput into some golden age of enlightenment, then I have to ask what is enlightenment?

The only hope I have is for a change in values to prevail, but again, values are personal, and more universal values need to prevail.  4 thousand years BC a book was written we today call the iChing.  The values in that book, about the values of the family becoming the foundation of the values of the society and vice versa were fundemental for the caring and support of the people.. He who governs least, governs best, etc.. what has changed in what we know?   Nothing.  Everyone forgets the lessons of the past and has to relearn over again almost every 3 generations.

If you don't believe me..  Read about the Glass Steagal Act and Wait till Windows 8 comes out..   ;D
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: guerande on October 09, 2011, 05:35:00 PM
Sory Ted, but your words seem to me extract of Adamski books ...

He certainly was a good boy, but nothing positive has been seen since he wrote his history !

All the best

Guerande  :)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 09, 2011, 09:13:45 PM
Sory Ted, but your words seem to me extract of Adamski books ...

He certainly was a good boy, but nothing positive has been seen since he wrote his history !

All the best

Guerande  :)
Sorry, nothing bizarre here, just the facts as i know them now. No Venusians with aluminum foil antennae. No Mothership with hundreds of Blonde Amazon Women, No Mr. Carpenter or Gort and no waiting in large groups to be whisked off to some Garden of Eden. Only the Reality of who we are and from where we began. Take it as you will, It no longer matters to me as i have delivered the message i was selected to give and have been given peace and understanding of everything that has taken place. No more dealing with Government Goons, Disinformation Agents,  Misdirected Researchers, Internet Sites with Hidden Agendas, Religious Fanatics,and Narrow Minded Members of The Human Race who can't accept that we are not the MASTERS of our existence. For everyone, i only wish the Realization and Understanding that i now have about this whole subject. I have been richly Blessed and Fortunate to have the Answers to everything that started this journey in 2007 and it is my sincere hope that everyone here will find that same Answer.
                                                                                                                                  Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: tomi on October 09, 2011, 10:49:35 PM
Would you please illuminate those of us who are curious what you mean by enlightenment?
Who these masters are?
What is the answer that you found that gives you peace?
And what exactly is the answer to everything that started in 2007?

Now it seems that this is a reasonable request to ask.  Curious to say the least.. but if misguided then please show me. 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 09, 2011, 11:47:32 PM
Would you please illuminate those of us who are curious what you mean by enlightenment?
Who these masters are?
What is the answer that you found that gives you peace?
And what exactly is the answer to everything that started in 2007?

Now it seems that this is a reasonable request to ask.  Curious to say the least.. but if misguided then please show me.
Tomi,  I would suggest that everyone go back and read THOROUGHLY every posting i have made here on the forum since i became a member. Your questions will be answered if you just read the entries. The only thing missing is the final assimilation of the details of the extraordinary ordeal. I was directed to do this myself by whoever or whatever power was responsible for my drone sighting and my telepathic encounter. The Answer was actually right there in my own words and i was not aware of it. It is a handicap of our Human Condition to be oblivious to what is right before our eyes. I was myself guilty of being so caught up in all the misinformation and deception that i did not see the TRUTH as it was presented to me. The final pieces of the answer became evident to me just last week and it is now clear in my mind. Those who seek the answer will find it in the my forum postings and will know immediately that the puzzle is complete and the Mystery Revealed!!!!     "Climb The Mountain and Know The Truth"

                                                                                                                                Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: tomi on October 10, 2011, 12:31:35 AM
Ted, if you didn't know the whole answer till last week and you wrote all the words before hand, why do you think that by any of us reading what you wrote we will get the answer too?

I think you need to provide some simple way of expressing your meanings for words you use, like "enlightenment" if you expect everyone to understand or take this seriously. 

In fact, it sounds to me a bit presumptuous to expect everyone to read yards of writing to distill what you claim when if you have "the answer", it should be concise enough at least to express in a way that can be understood.   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on October 10, 2011, 12:48:37 AM
If Ted has found the answer, then let him be.  The answer is a reflection, in part, of the one asking the question.  To see that change is coming, look around you at your own little realm.  Keep an eye on the world situations and the players that prance by.  The UFO phenomena can never be proved or disproved by a photo all should know that now.  There is a greater phenomena that manifest itself daily and is ignored by the blind.  The phenomena appreciates this and thanks the skeptic for they are the perfect cover.  The phenomena likes a surprise and believe me one is coming in full force and it will include every man and woman and child.  So Ted should have his peace for he has accepted the part revealed to him and the phenomena is well aware of Ted's acceptance.  The cool regard of dark eyes of a cold reproach are upon us all.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: tomi on October 10, 2011, 01:08:24 AM
Well Lev, if one's answer is a reflection in part of the one asking the question, then cool regard from dark eyes might just be the answer that you get from your reflection on things.

Why can't I just believe in what is positive and see that manifest itself more frequently?  Why does everything have to have malevolent underpinnings from the way you describe it?

I know I sound sophmoric as hell to you, and skeptical as hell of other matters being discussed but I ask with interest and sincerity.
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on October 10, 2011, 01:52:34 AM
Malevolence is the result of a power greater than us that has an agenda that we interfere with.  Now there are answers to this and ways to reach good.  You must choose that way
not me.  What I say to you is that the power of this malevolence is far beyond anything but the myth of humankind.  It has many names and many faces and it is more real than you or I.  Now good is above it and real good it fears, but who has this real good and who will seek to find, nourish and keep it!  If you can then do so, but never forget what is always just behind you preparing its on counterfeit reality for you.  Of course my reflection is dark because it is there I am most comfortable.  Often at other sites my group has been ridiculed and disbelieved, do you believe that we did not manipulate that so that instead of tucking our tails we could go down showing the complete stupidity and arrogance of Dil.  We are still there, just in different personalities.  Our simple mission has always been for a very few to find a possible new view of a possible truth.  What you do is up to you.
L E V I A T H A N
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 10, 2011, 01:55:04 AM
To Enjoy and Contemplate
While We Wait !!!!

Back In Time - Huey Lewis & The News (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD-drh88vqY#ws)
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: tomi on October 10, 2011, 09:14:16 AM
Lev, I believe what you are saying is as close as possible to what I listened to in the lecture by Houston Smith:
http://www.futurehi.net/media.html (http://www.futurehi.net/media.html)

And this is true as well IMO:

"Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffectiveness.  That the moment one definitely commits oneself, then Providence moves, too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. 'Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it.'"
(from W.H. Murray, "The Scottish Himalayan Expedition")

Re: the powers of your group :) ... Somehow, through all of this, I ended up with this kitten (now cat) that must be one of your practical jokes ;) Malevolent doesn't even describe him sufficently enough..
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: danblast on October 12, 2011, 09:50:45 PM
No Mothership with hundreds of Blonde Amazon Women                                                   

Dam!
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 12, 2011, 10:17:49 PM
No Mothership with hundreds of Blonde Amazon Women                                                   

Dam!
I know Dan, I feel your Pain !!! I am disappointed too :)

                                                                                                          Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 12, 2011, 11:18:44 PM
Ted, you sure amaze me! The Blonde Amazon Women story word play sure are just dan-dy!  8)


Quote
Climb The Mountain and Know The Truth

Did you feel in your mind, when you recieved your message telepathically, that it was some
sort of "God-like" entity that commanded you to spread these words, or more intuitive as like
something you were to understand, and then speak of?

The reason I ask, is if these entities that "spoke" to you, using telepathic ways, might be the same
entities that once started our religions, as they were wide spread around the world for more than 2000 years,
and even before that, found in the oldest civilisations as well?

We really don't know the true origin of religious belief, therefor it is interesting to play a little with
this.

Maybe religion is something that is an ingrown/inherited part of Us all, or it's started in a way just as similar as
your experience? And then became a social common, even as diverted as it is?

Thank you very much for your engagement here, your posts are always welcomed,

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 13, 2011, 12:14:31 AM
Ted, you sure amaze me! And the Blonde Amazon Women story word play sure are just dan-dy!  8)


Quote
Climb The Mountain and Know The Truth

Did you feel in your mind, when you recieved your message telepathically, that it was some
sort of "God-like" entity that commanded you to spread these words, or more intuitive as like
something you were to understand, and then speak of?

The reason I ask, is if these entities that "spoke" to you, using telepathic ways, might be the same
entities that once started our religions, as they were wide spread around the world for more than 2000 years,
and even before that, found in the oldest civilisations as well?

We really don't know the true origin of religious belief, therefor it is interesting to play a little with
this.

Maybe religion is something that is an ingrown/inherited part of Us all, or it's started in a way just as similar as
your experience? And then became a social common, even as diverted as it is?

Thank you very much for your engagement here, your posts are always welcomed,

EVS
Hi EVS,
I can't say it was like a Religious experience, because i honestly have never had what people refer to as a Religious Experience. My impressions of the encounter were of a far superior life force with much more vast knowledge and mental abilities than any human that i have ever encountered. It was as if they knew what questions i was to ask before i even began to ask, while they were formulating in my mind. It was a truly overwhelming feeling of inadequacy on my behalf  to even be able to converse with them on the telepathic level. I had the feeling they must have thought i was some illiterate babbling idiot and were sitting back and shaking their heads and thinking, why are we wasting our time on these Ants?? But on the other side of the coin i felt a true benevolent presence that had a soothing , calming and reassuring effect on me that gave me a feeling of peace and security that i was under no fear of harm or ridicule. They  exuded an aura of absolute power and control and i knew that they were in control of the entire experience.  Their thoughts as given to me were Stern but tempered with understanding of the Human existence and aware of our frailties and shortcomings. They were quite clear that they were and are in charge.

                                                                                                                                  Ted   
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 15, 2011, 12:33:56 AM
Quote
Hi EVS,
I can't say it was like a Religious experience, because i honestly have never had what people refer to as a Religious Experience. My impressions of the encounter were of a far superior life force with much more vast knowledge and mental abilities than any human that i have ever encountered. It was as if they knew what questions i was to ask before i even began to ask, while they were formulating in my mind. It was a truly overwhelming feeling of inadequacy on my behalf  to even be able to converse with them on the telepathic level. I had the feeling they must have thought i was some illiterate babbling idiot and were sitting back and shaking their heads and thinking, why are we wasting our time on these Ants?? But on the other side of the coin i felt a true benevolent presence that had a soothing , calming and reassuring effect on me that gave me a feeling of peace and security that i was under no fear of harm or ridicule. They  exuded an aura of absolute power and control and i knew that they were in control of the entire experience.  Their thoughts as given to me were Stern but tempered with understanding of the Human existence and aware of our frailties and shortcomings. They were quite clear that they were and are in charge.

                                                                                                                                  Ted

Hi Ted,

Thank you for clearing that up to us all!

I think your honesty speaks greatly to us all, and I for one appreciate this!

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 15, 2011, 02:37:18 AM
Quote
Hi EVS,
I can't say it was like a Religious experience, because i honestly have never had what people refer to as a Religious Experience. My impressions of the encounter were of a far superior life force with much more vast knowledge and mental abilities than any human that i have ever encountered. It was as if they knew what questions i was to ask before i even began to ask, while they were formulating in my mind. It was a truly overwhelming feeling of inadequacy on my behalf  to even be able to converse with them on the telepathic level. I had the feeling they must have thought i was some illiterate babbling idiot and were sitting back and shaking their heads and thinking, why are we wasting our time on these Ants?? But on the other side of the coin i felt a true benevolent presence that had a soothing , calming and reassuring effect on me that gave me a feeling of peace and security that i was under no fear of harm or ridicule. They  exuded an aura of absolute power and control and i knew that they were in control of the entire experience.  Their thoughts as given to me were Stern but tempered with understanding of the Human existence and aware of our frailties and shortcomings. They were quite clear that they were and are in charge.

                                                                                                                                  Ted

Hi Ted,

Thank you for clearing that up to us all!

I think your honesty speaks greatly to us all, and I for one appreciate this!

EVS
Hi EVS,

Thanks for those kind words.

In relation to my Drone Sighting and while we wait for more proof of this phenomenon , I thought I would relate a incident of a similar nature from my childhood. In 1962 at the age of 8, at my home in Atlanta Georgia, I had the only other strange encounter of this type in my life. It was late on a Saturday afternoon in the summer and my sister, my cousin, and myself were playing in our backyard. We were running around, as kids will do, chasing each other about, when my cousin, who was the same age as myself, suddenly stopped running around and was starring at the sky. She said LOOK at that!! At which time my sister , who is 5 years my senior, and myself looked up in the direction that my cousin was looking. To our amazement, we saw about 100 feet above us, a large Shiny Silver Disc shaped object hovering above us. The object was making a very low pitched buzzing sound similar to the sound a modern day Weed Eater makes. This object continued to hover directly over us for about a minute or so before increasing it's altitude but maintaining its position above us. My Sister ran to the house to get my parents and my Aunt and Uncle who lived next door to come out and see this. My parents and Aunt and Uncle came out of the houses and into our back yard where they also witnessed this object. My mother ran back into the house to call the police on the telephone. The rest of this encounter is kind of sketchy to me now, I guess because of my age at the time, but I remember the police arriving and sometime after that a local news camera crew with a truck that had a lift platform on top on which a cameraman with a very large camera was filming this object. It was dark by this time and I remember the object was by that time at a very high altitude and skipping about in the sky in all directions like a star just moving from point to point. It seem to leave a trail each time it moved from point to point . I remember it was moving all over the sky. That is all I recall of this incident, but my sister and cousin still remember this event, but my sister refuses to discuss this anymore, and I have tried to get her to tell me what she recalled, but with no luck. She is a very religious person who refuses to believe in anything of this nature. I have never been able to find any record of this occurrence, but remember everyone in my neighborhood being in my backyard that evening watching all this occur.

                                                            Ted
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: EVS on October 15, 2011, 03:47:20 AM
Hi Ted,

Thank you for sharing your story, I have had almost a similar encounter when I was a teenager, so this is not unfamiliar to me.
I just never told the full story, but it sure says something about your credability, that you chose to come forward with this childhood story of yours. I think many people actually have experienced stories like the one you were so free to tell, only fear of ridicule has held them back. You sure aren't alone. Thank you for sharing. If only more people would do the same, then we would not feel alone in sharing our past experiences. We only are here for such a short while, what harm can it do to share our experiences?

I have great respect that you have chosen to speak freely, you have great credit in my book!!

EVS
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 15, 2011, 04:29:25 AM
Hi Ted,

Thank you for sharing your story, I have had almost a similar encounter when I was a teenager, so this is not unfamiliar to me.
I just never told the full story, but it sure says something about your credability, that you chose to come forward with this childhood story of yours. I think many people actually have experienced stories like the one you were so free to tell, only fear of ridicule has held them back. You sure aren't alone. Thank you for sharing. If only more people would do the same, then we would not feel alone in sharing our past experiences. We only are here for such a short while, what harm can it do to share our experiences?

I have great respect that you have chosen to speak freely, you have great credit in my book!!

EVS
Thanks EVS,  Until recently i haven't thought of this childhood experience as having any bearing or relationship to my Drone experience. Now i am questioning whether there is some connection. I was so young when it happened, it really did not seem to be related to my Adult experience. It is amazing how many other people i have spoken with including yourself, have had such similar encounters in their early years. I haven't come forward with this story until now because i thought it might cloud the issue of the Drone Mystery and the research being done to find answers. I feel now that it may indeed have some connection with why i have had the Drone Encounters and might help to resolve all this. As a child, i remember it was quite an event !!!!

                                                                                                                               Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: ominoustruth on October 18, 2011, 11:00:45 PM
Hi Everyone:

Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Author Erich von Däniken will be presenting his belief in the "GREEK CONNECTION" in regards to Extraterrestrial Visitation and the Theory of the Greek Gods having left this planet and their imminent return.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/10/18 (http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/10/18)

                                                                                                                   Ted 
Title: Re: Ted Connors - Alabama
Post by: The Leviathan on October 18, 2011, 11:37:15 PM
The priest I know, who is an authority on ancient Greek, has said that he is sure that Oltissis is colloquial Greek.  He is continuing to interpret the word.
L E V I A T H A N