Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Drone related? / Re: Bob Lazar - UFO - Propulsion - S-4, Area 51
« Last post by DroneTeamNews on February 27, 2020, 07:41:55 AM »

The whole thing fascinated me, especially these two "CARET" related items:

Strange writing mentioned at the 27:22 mark
"At one point in time when the disk was energized, one of the archways became transparent and you could see the area outside of it just if the archway was a window. After the panel had been transparent for a while, a form of writing which was unlike alphabetic scientific or mathematical symbols I had ever seen began to appear on the transparent archway, and I was never informed as to how all of this was achieved."


Invisibility mode mentioned at 31.36 mark:
"When gravity field is on ... the disk can't be seen from any vantage point , and for all practical purposes is invisible. "

For reference, here is simple comparison of symbols drawn by Bob Lazar to the CARET symbols.


Also, from earlier posts:

The iBeam symbols drawn by Jesse Marcel Jr


Also, compare the design elements of the CARET / LAP symbols to those recalled by Betty Hill.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_and_Barney_Hill_abduction
2
For those who haven't seen it, here is Linda Moulton Howe's 2015 summary of events in 2007.



https://youtu.be/yPAU6-OMNFM?t=3220


3
An e-message was sent to Isaac, but no response was received.

Achieving an effective communication path with Isaac will be challenging because:
(1) all digital messages can be monitored / intercepted / interfered with
(2) given his previous disclosures, Isaac (the esteemed JPL scientist) will need to trust that messages are exchanged with a potential 'friend' (not an actual 'foe').
(3) Isaac may be unwilling to take additional risks answering community questions [even if a trusted/ secure communication channel is established and his choice to remain anonymous is respected + responses stay off-the-record].

Given the CARET disclosures had limited affect in 2007, denial in 2020 may be a simpler route for Isaac than his admission of involvement. [Google - "Isaac" "CARET" "PACL" - and there is minimal information available, only 4160 search results.]

How can Isaac distinguish friend from foe? [He would be aware that agents can pose as 'friendly' in order to 'catch' him breaking his NDA again. Despite his efforts toward anonymity, the esteemed scientist fell silent in 2007, and by logical inference, it is likely that Isaac and family were threatened into submission. As a second security breach might prove fatal, a careful approach is necessary.]

To maximise the chance of a successful outcome [admission from Isaac with possibly further PACL documentation], the best path involves engaging public figures with a demonstrated track record of progressing disclosure. In order to establish trust, Isaac needs to be able to verify that any individuals who contact him are not agents. If Isaac feels at risk because he has not been approached in a safe and secure manner, the default response available to him his denial of involvement. Such a negative result does not assist the UFO community in learning more about the CARET program.

The DRT is trying to build a credible team that can potentially contact Isaac in a non-digital manner. Thirteen years ago, Isaac trusted LMH enough to communicate the CARET materials in his possession. Perhaps in 2020, Isaac might also be able to verify and trust that Richard Dolan is a respected, professional in the UFO research field.  Further outreach to both Linda Moulton Howe and Richard Dolan is anticipated, however, no additional updates are currently available. It may take time to build the necessary level of trust and find a non-digital means to directly establish dialogue with Isaac.

Please be aware that the chances of successful communications with Isaac are very low. Denial or no response are more likely outcomes for this endeavour. However, genuine and sincere effort is being made for reputable professionals in the field of UFOlogy to contact the esteemed JPL scientist, who the DRT identifies in all probability, as being Isaac.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For interest, here is video testimony of Brigadier General Stephen Lovekin regarding the "symbols of instruction" and the reverse engineering activities which were detailed by Isaac in his account:



https://youtu.be/0WZyDglNi5Y?t=624
http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=748.0


"What happened was [President] Eisenhower got sold out... he lost control of what was going on with the entire UFO situation... he trusted too many people... I think that he realized that all of a sudden this matter was going into the control of corporations, that could very well be used in detriment to this country... He realized that he was losing control, he realized that this phenomenon of whatever it was that we were faced with was not going to be in the best hands... that was a real concern and so it has turned out to be."
Brigadier General Stephen Lovekin
https://youtu.be/0WZyDglNi5Y?t=1377
4
General discussion / Re: Brig. General Steven Lovekin describing Alien Language.
« Last post by DroneTeamNews on February 13, 2020, 11:21:42 PM »
Here is the detailed video testimony of Brigadier General Stephen Lovekin regarding "symbols of instruction":

https://youtu.be/0WZyDglNi5Y?t=624

5
WOAH Issac has been identified! Holy smokes you guys have been busy.

Any updates of the results of reaching out to him?
6
2019 News / what do you make of this?
« Last post by spinnewise on February 07, 2020, 09:08:33 PM »
ARCHANGEL RECON OFFERS DRONE EXPLANATION
EDITOR’S NOTE: A man named Michael Spicer with the group ArchAngel RECON contacted the Yuma Pioneer, taking responsibility for the nighttime drone sightings that hit the region in the past weeks. The following is his explanation, which was published in the Pioneer Jan. 23.

https://www.holyokeenterprise.com/local/archangel-recon-offers-drone-explanation#.XjQeOUDMjd9.mailto

 :o
8
Art / Year 2020 Silver UFO Coin Solomon Islands on HSN
« Last post by TimeTraveler33 on January 23, 2020, 05:27:48 PM »
The sale of the flying saucer coin may be inspired from the mainstream published event of the Navy 2004 Nimitz encounter in the Pacific Ocean.  The televised science fiction series Project Blue Book is airing season 2 this month.  On Netflix is the new television series of Lost In Space.

2020 Solomon Islands UFO Flying Saucer Shaped 1oz. Silver $2 Coin. Selling at $119 at www.hsn.com. The televised Home Shopping Network channel.


https://youtu.be/gmAuUV7ZvE4
9
Welcome to 2020!

With multiple insights gained during 2019, it's now possible to review the past 70 - 80 years of human engagement of visiting extraterrestrials. For those decades since we became a nuclear armed species, there have been at least two shadowy streams of intelligence-related activities which have been hidden from public acknowledgement. One stream of highly secret activity has been the reverse engineering of celestially 'gifted' extraterrestrial technologies. (Leaked, for example, through Isaac's account of E.T. human interaction and PACL CARET research). The other stream, which has been a clever distraction for the masses and a form of UFO acclimatisation - has represented a multi-decade dance of denial mixed with hints of UFO reality. (The culmination of which seems to be the scripted disclosures of TTSA and AATIP.)

At least compared to 2007, 2019 revealed some progress on the matter of Disclosure. More information may be released during 2020.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31798/the-secretive-inventor-of-the-navys-bizarre-ufo-patents-finally-talks

Further revelations may assist, for public benefit, other pro-disclosure whistleblowers to come forward.

The Drone Research Team has an important announcement.


**************************************


** DRONE TEAM NEWS UPDATE 2020 **

Following significant investigation last year, the Drone Research Team can announce that, in all probability, the individual known as 'Isaac' has been identified.
http://droneteam.com/history/isaac/

The DRT understands that 'Isaac', per his account, is a scientist - one who has achieved a great deal in his chosen domain and who is well respected in industry. 'Isaac' is still alive today. Presumably, renewed communications by Isaac would represent a significant risk on his part - given that in 2007 he was likely forced into silence by anti-disclosure authorities.

Whilst honouring Isaac's previously stated wish to remain anonymous, the DRT has attempted to establish private communication with this renowned scientist - via reputable UFO researchers who have a track record of progressing Disclosure. The hope is that Isaac, having been identified approximately 13 years after he leaked the CARET information to the public in 2007, will now find a courageous way to re-engage with publicly verifiable figures (such as Linda Moulton Howe or Richard Dolan).

**************************************
 
In his account, 'Isaac' states that he was a civilian engineer/scientist working on a government / military run initiative known as PACL CARET. The DRT has determined that, in all probability, Isaac was a relatively significant employee of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory - who worked on the NASA funded civilian space-research program as part of his 'cover'. Through early ARPA research and subsequent DoD security clearances, with NASA and JPL as his civilian cover, it is likely that Isaac interacted with scientists across California (including Palo Alto) and that these scientists were themselves employed by private defense firms (such as Lockheed LMSC). Such private-organisational structure 'fits' with the experience described in Dr E.W. Davis / Admiral Wilson notes - which suggest that Admiral Wilson was denied access to a major private defense firm - NOT a government owned research division. In terms of statutory public oversight and proper governance function, there is a clear difference between government-operated facilities and private firms (where in the case of the latter, public oversight authority is vastly diminished). In the documented Wilson account, when the Admiral sought to confirm his oversight authority of the extraterrestrial Exceptionally Compartmented Information (E.C.I), his military career was threatened and obfuscation occurred. The experience is highly suggestive of criminal clandestine activity by members of a private cabal that have thoroughly infiltrated the highest levels of government - in the USA and around the world.  Lest we never forget - J.F.K and the subsequent cover-up.

Questions continued:
23. How does the Jet Propulsion Laboratory fit with PACL and Isaac's account?

As it is important for the public to understand the military-related history of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, further posts are pending regarding JPL and the background of Isaac. Historically, JPL has represented it's own version of a non-government (military) research facility. It receives government funding yet operates privately under the umbrella of NASA and as a separate research domain of Caltech. In that sense, JPL is shielded from the purview of the US Congress. In terms of JPL covert military activity, the investigations by Peter J. Westwick (2007) are very insightful: 'Into the Black: JPL and the American Space Program.'
 
https://epdf.pub/into-the-black-jpl-and-the-american-space-program-1976-2004.html

From it's very foundation, Caltech's JPL was involved in top secret military-related research. It was awarded the first US Army Ordnance contract for ballistic missiles in June 1944.  This contract followed pioneering work by Robert H. Goddard at Roswell, New Mexico during 1930 to 1941. The dreams of Verne and Wells were combined with the pioneering rocketry work of Goddard and Oberth and later developments in technology to create the dawning military-led space age. This work also led to the eventual development of nuclear armed (intercontinental) ballistic missiles - a threat described by Dr Louis N. Ridenour from which "there is no defense". It's not surprising that, as our species exponentially grew and technologically advanced, human progress attracted ever-greater interest from visiting extraterrestrials.


 
https://www.governmentattic.org/12docs/USAFandNSecSpacePgm1946-1988.pdf



In terms of 'Subverted Extraterrestrial Clandestine Reverse Engineered Technology' (S.E.C.R.E.T.), much can be learned by investigating the organisations (and senior individuals associated with those enterprises) connected to 20th century covert military aerospace R&D. This includes those historically connected military, government and scientific persons who would likely have known about such S.E.C.R.E.T activities from inception - for example, following the 1947 Roswell, New Mexico craft retrieval and the establishment of the US National Security state and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that same year. 





Quite naturally, the initial phases of the PACL program, would have been hidden within technologically related space-based developments - which were funded by the US Government and the American taxpayer. In the decades passed, PACL's reverse engineering program, as revealed by Isaac, can be considered in context of the "information explosion" which originated with post-WWII USA. As noted in the 2019 posts above - and given what we now know about the structuring of Exceptionally Compartmented Information (E.C.I's) - it's very probable that the highly clandestine CORONA program was one of several black programs which hid the CARET initiative. Black programs (such as CORONA, declassified in 1995) were themselves historically hidden by relevant civilian 'cover' programs (such as through organisations like ARPA and NASA in the 1960's). Taken together such long-running core secrets (with strong Palo Alto connections to Lockheed Missiles and Space), tie directly into the Dr E.W. Davis / Admiral Wilson notes and the account described therein.



Those notes confirm that extraterrestrial technologies are in the hands of a highly secretive, private group of human beings which has strongly resisted public oversight for the materials in their possession. In 2019, it was essentially reported that Dr. E.W. Davis confirmed the main facts related to those notes and decades of reverse engineering activity.

In terms of secret, sub-optimal research on extraterrestrial technologies, for the private cabal, hiding funds from US Congressional review would have been a persistent issue to overcome. The solution to maintaining secrecy was a corruption which usurped government and infiltrated key public institutions. It seems senior CIA leadership and private industrialists were a core part of that secret action.




https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2014-004-doc01.pdf

From a 20th century military perspective, technologies developed to globally counter human adversaries of the United States could also potentially be used to gain intelligence over other foreign (extraterrestrial) 'intruders'. Early clandestine projects which involved satellite/spacecraft operation (and the products associated with this activity - such as information processing of reconnaissance data) would have represented a natural engineering fit. Similarly, advanced beam weapons and energy research would also likely have been hidden within Atomic related research and development projects. No doubt, the sophistication of ECI structures grew hand-in-hand with the need for increasing national secrecy during the 1950's and 1960's (as the ideological Cold War deepened and as human technical progress + investment (and industrial profits) accelerated through the dawning of the Space age.




In the 1950's, Lee A. DuBridge, President of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and Chairman of the Science Advisory Committee, formed a special national security task force, approved by President Dwight D. Eisenhower - Technological Capabilities Panel {TCP). Between August 1954 and January 1955 that group, which included many of those who had produced the Beacon Hill Report (such as Dr Louis N. Ridenour) represented the best that American science and engineering offered. Their analysis was presented to the National Security Council on 14 February 1955 and by all published accounts that report affected the course of national security affairs enormously. The CIA together with private defense firms such as Lockheed were at the subsequent heart of many of the technical initiatives which formalised as core secret, national security priorities.












Thus, to understand PACL in context of critical US technological development during the 20th century, it is important to review
i) the rise of the US Missile and Space program in the decades following WWII,
ii) the use of civilian covers by the military to obscure secret aerospace and technological development,
iii) the use of private defense firms for outsourced R&D (thereby obscuring government oversight of clandestine ECI programs).

In the 1950's missiles and satellites changed world perception. The landscape of the Cold War was established through fear and massive increases in military expenditures. Many individuals in  the UFO community either don't know or forget that it was Lockheed that coordinated the construction of Area-51 facilities under the guidance of some infamous CIA figures. Recall that the Central Intelligence Agency was created on 26th July 1947 when President Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act into law. The CIA's predecessor began during WWII on 11th July 1941 through Colonel William J. Donovan and the establishment of Service of Strategic Information under President Franklin D. Roosevelt- later formally known as the Office of Strategic Services, OSS.

(Curiously, both dates are respectively close to those of the reported April 1941 Cape Girardeau, Missouri UFO retrieval and the July 1947 Roswell, New Mexico UFO retrieval.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Act_of_1947

In the 21st century, in terms of disclosing the roles of Isaac, JPL, PACL, Lockheed and the CIA in S.E.C.R.E.T programs - recorded historical action can give far better perspective than modern words with today's latest media spin. Further posts are pending.
10
Drone related? / Re: strange dreams 1967
« Last post by spinnewise on January 20, 2020, 01:10:28 PM »
update
new weird connection to "reality"



this is the new Changi airport in Singapore
and it also looks very similar to the control room of the mothership
except there was a huge tree in the middle of the waterfall
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10