An e-message was sent to Isaac, but no response was received.
Achieving an effective communication path with Isaac will be challenging because:
(1) all digital messages can be monitored / intercepted / interfered with
(2) given his previous disclosures, Isaac (the esteemed JPL scientist) will need to trust that messages are exchanged with a potential 'friend' (not an actual 'foe').
(3) Isaac may be unwilling to take additional risks answering community questions [
even if a trusted/ secure communication channel is established and his choice to remain anonymous is respected + responses stay off-the-record].
Given the CARET disclosures had limited affect in 2007, denial in 2020 may be a simpler route for Isaac than his admission of involvement. [
Google - "Isaac" "CARET" "PACL" - and there is minimal information available, only 4160 search results.]
How can Isaac distinguish friend from foe? [
He would be aware that agents can pose as 'friendly' in order to 'catch' him breaking his NDA again. Despite his efforts toward anonymity, the esteemed scientist fell silent in 2007, and by logical inference, it is likely that Isaac and family were threatened into submission. As a second security breach might prove fatal, a careful approach is necessary.]
To maximise the chance of a successful outcome [
admission from Isaac with possibly further PACL documentation], the best path involves engaging public figures with a demonstrated track record of progressing disclosure. In order to establish trust, Isaac needs to be able to verify that any individuals who contact him are not agents. If Isaac feels at risk because he has not been approached in a safe and secure manner, the default response available to him his denial of involvement. Such a negative result does not assist the UFO community in learning more about the CARET program.
The DRT is trying to build a credible team that can potentially contact Isaac in a non-digital manner. Thirteen years ago, Isaac trusted LMH enough to communicate the CARET materials in his possession. Perhaps in 2020, Isaac might also be able to verify and trust that Richard Dolan is a respected, professional in the UFO research field. Further outreach to both Linda Moulton Howe and Richard Dolan is anticipated, however, no additional updates are currently available. It may take time to build the necessary level of trust and find a non-digital means to directly establish dialogue with Isaac.
Please be aware that the chances of successful communications with Isaac are very low. Denial or no response are more likely outcomes for this endeavour. However, genuine and sincere effort is being made for reputable professionals in the field of UFOlogy to contact the esteemed JPL scientist, who the DRT identifies in all probability, as being Isaac.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For interest, here is video testimony of Brigadier General Stephen Lovekin regarding the "symbols of instruction" and the reverse engineering activities which were detailed by Isaac in his account:
https://youtu.be/0WZyDglNi5Y?t=624http://droneteam.com/drt/index.php?topic=748.0"
What happened was [President] Eisenhower got sold out... he lost control of what was going on with the entire UFO situation... he trusted too many people... I think that he realized that all of a sudden this matter was going into the control of corporations, that could very well be used in detriment to this country... He realized that he was losing control, he realized that this phenomenon of whatever it was that we were faced with was not going to be in the best hands... that was a real concern and so it has turned out to be."
Brigadier General Stephen Lovekinhttps://youtu.be/0WZyDglNi5Y?t=1377
Recent Posts
