I'll post here some mathematical findings on the Chad drone that I posted in OMF a while ago. It is not sooo complex as one would think, but it adds on the complexity of the entire Drone saga, and increases the mistery behind this fantastic ufo episode... Every inch of the crafts was carefully designed.

-------------------

Since there's no metric unit to use, I used the 'pixel' unit. But the important in these findings are the proportions and relations between a 'pixel' measurement compared to the other in some way.

They shows us that the distances of some parts of the drone were specifically and purposely calculated using logarithmic curves and, in one particullar case that I'll point out, a same curve is used, with precision, in at least 4 parts of the drone, being one of them of high importance.

Backed up by 'knowhow' findings, these reveal us that, as Rajinder's Drone, Chad's drone measurements were not created randomly, but were based in mathematical relations, and precisely repeated in different parts of the drone.

First I thought in trying to see any relations between the thicker and the thinner parts of the small arm:

Since what I was searching was based in proportions, the slight distorted perspective would not interfere since it variates all the distances but keeps the proportions between them.

To make that I separated those distances in two, like I said, the thinner ones and the thicker ones. The thinner one could call intervals.

I choose the blue color for the thicker parts and the red for the intervals. You can already see that the intervals change in some particullar way.

After that I measured them, and the result was:

Red: 3 - 9 - 18 - 27

Blue: 28 - 21 - 16 - 71

ps: a mathematical relation is already present in the red - intervals - sequence. First times 3 is the second, that times 2 is the third, that times 1.5 is the fourth and so on ( 3, 2, 1.5, ....)

Using the numbers I made a graphic where a curve is visible:

Here you see the logarithmic curve to the red intervals, call it CurveA

And a logarithmic curve for the blue with a highly accentuated variation for the last point, call it: CurveB.

Since the total distance of the small arms appear to always be the same for the four ones in all the drones, and in the Chad images it is apparently true as well (it cannot be checked though) I would risk saying that those curves are the same for all of the other three secondary arms of Chad's drone.

The other thing I measured was, then, the large, primary, arm.

There are just 2 intervals in the large arm, that have the exact same distance, so I didn't consider them. I measured just the large sections with the inscriptions.

But there was a problem, going from left to right, I could not say exactly were finishes the last section (from the right) that connects the entire arm to the body of the drone:

So I thought: would the curve of the distances of the small arms be the same of this large arm and indicates me where exactly finishes the last section of the large arm?

I measured the parts and the results were

365 - 118 - ??

After cheking a match between the proportions of the both first sections of the small and large arm, I could go on with the due estimate of the third part.

Applying the same variation to the last part, there was a surprise:

The last measurement came up with a line that finished exactly in the middle of that triple 'round artifact'. Tracing a line that connected those three 'round artifacts', forming a isosceles triangle, I then discovered that the line ends in the exact baricenter of the triangle, what is considered the 'true center' of a triangle.

This just confirmed that the same CurveB is present in both primary and secondary arms of the drone.

And I would risk saying that all of this probably applies to Raj's drone as well.

Regards

Ark