I forgot to thank you for these kind words that you posted last week on UCB.
Good to know we are among friends. 
You're most welcome. And I really do feel like it here.

What I don't understand is the motivation behind some people's constant tries to prevent further research into this case by creating endless, meaningless (off-topic!) arguments and forcing others into accepting their conclusions by using whatever explanation seems handy at the moment. I mean, if they've concluded it is a hoax and not worth wasting time, why still discuss it? They seem desperate sometimes, resolving to insults, false accusations, character-smear campaigns and what not, just to achieve their goal. Why?
IMO, forums should work like this: you present the facts as you see them and let others draw their own conclusions about the subject - as simple as that. But when someone constantly revises his "facts" and pushes people around into accepting his conclusions - the only right thing to do is to
ignore him. I believe exclusion of such people right from the start is another thing that makes this forum great - there's simply no other way to deal with them. But now I'm being off-topic...

I've checked your latest example images and also some of the others by the same author on flickr in ELA and can't find anything conclusively wrong about them - only the first example seems "fishy", but it could be a fluke. Now, back to shadow analysis...