I think the individual who is quoted below has a habit of periodically posting anonymously on various ufo forums with grandiose claims but limited follow through in terms of verifiable experience or scientific claim. (Whilst there may be parallels to the similarly anonymous Isaac account

I believe this individual's claims are limited and unexceptional at best. Worse, such claims are likely to be negatively distracting and disingenous.
Unlike Isaac, said individual thrives on elaborate communication. Compare the technically precise language of Isaac to that phrased by said invidivual. Thus, I believe this anonymous individual has no relation to the anonymous Isaac. Since this person reads and responds to ufo forums, his or her claims should be put to test - that is - deliver something tangible in the presence of independent witnesses or please leave quietly - no further attention to be offered.
Refer to the ufocasebook postings and member responses:
http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=drone&num=1245270084&action=display&start=255As a statement of opinion only, I believe this individual suffers from a form of attention seeking psychosis and does do not contribute any meaningful insight to the analysis of the Isaac material / drone photographs. Perhaps this individual can self diagnose after reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosis 
My opinion could be wrongly formed of course... I could also be suffering from one or many pscyhological disorders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_of_transparencyNow to the artists listed as potential contributors to the Isaac materials... I don't think Paul Laffoley is suitable. (No offense to Paul - I really like his work.) Why? Apart from the colourful, organic, free-flowing nature of his work, he seems to focus on pentagram and hexagonal designs (typical of alternative human practices like witchcraft). Contrast this with the octal features of the LAP. In other words, his work does not seem to be as rigidly geometrically interconnected and rules-based as the LAP design.
I've often wondered why the strong advocates of a hoax have not come forward with a more thorough/diligent search for the lazy hoaxer based on some kind of pscyh /skill profile. Perhaps this idea is worthy of a post somewhere on the DRT.
The lazy hoaxer would need to possess:
Reasonable skills in
- 3D cgi
- 2D illustration
- model making
- photography
- font design and digital typesetting
- eloquent and concise report writing abilities
- anonymous document and website creation
Sufficient working knowledge to reasonably describe:
- aspects of computer science e.g. big O notation, permutations of sets
- engineering reporting, component labelling etc.
Take inspiration from:
- particle physics, specifically collision event data visualisation techniques
- quantum mechanics, specifically graphical display of wavefunctions
- basic geometrical arrangements
- ufology / sci-fi
Apply in the hoax:
-rigid geometrical constructions consisting of intersecting circles, curves and lines together with octagonal structures.
-avoid the use of colour, hollow rectangles and hollow squares in the design
- be subtle, patient, non-attention seeking
- be non commercially minded with artwork and designs
etc
etc
etc...