Agreed. As described in the report and by Isaac, the device 'S1' is a remotely activated switch with 3 primary modes of operation. It would be reasonable to assume in my opinion that ANY statement which described how the S1 switch worked would be obscured/redacted/removed/deleted from any citizen without a need to know, including those civilian scientists working in PACL. This is because the S1 switch can CONTROL the gravitational field emission and component assembly of drone type alien craft actively monitoring our planet / operating in our atmosphere. In other words, inadvertent reproduction of the characteristics of the technology could interfere with their operation or crash such craft. Isaac himself refers to the intermittent invisibility reported by â??witnessesâ?? as an inadvertent activation of the switch - a form of radar jamming.
â??I've had some direct contact with this device, or at least a device capable of the same thing, and this kind of mistake is not unprecedented. I am personally aware of at least one other incident in which this kind of technology was accidentally set off, resulting in the sudden visibility of normally invisible things... Our having access to this kind of device, along with our occasionally haphazard experimentation on them, has lead to everything from cloaking malfunctions like this to full-blown crashes.â??
So for example, stating something like - the switch wirelessly communicates an encoded signal via a strong terahertz pulse for a short period of time â?? might be enough to get curious scientists experimenting/working to reproduce these signals, resulting in chaos outside of the laboratory and directly on the streets.
With this reasoning, it makes sense to me that any references to the operating characteristics of S1 were removed from the report prior to distribution of it to those personnel without a very strong need to know.
Isaac also states that he has not seen aliens. â??There it was, probably the biggest secret in the world, in a bunch of parts spread out on laboratory tablesâ?? No reference to whole cadavers or preserved organic samples. â??One downside to CARET was that it wasn't as well-connected as other operations undoubtedly were. I never got to see any actual extra-terrestrials (not even photos), and in fact never even saw one of their compete vehicles. 99% of what I saw was related to the work at hand, all of which was conducted within a very narrow context on individual artifacts only.â?? Artefacts, not biological specimens or samples.
PACL ... â??had everything we needed. State of the art hardware and a staff of over 200 computer scientists, electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, physicists and mathematicians.â?? Note Isaac makes no reference to biologists, material scientists or chemists. So if Isaacs account is to be believed, PACL was not investigating alien nano-scale computational hardware which might have a biological user interface.
Isaac gives clues to how the A1 / S1 artefacts interact: â??While I didnâ??t do a lot of work with the antigrav hardware myself, I was occasionally involved in the assessment of how that technology was meant to interface with its user.â?? He then proceeds to describe â??the languageâ?? ...â?? Their hardware wasnâ??t operated in quite the same way as ours... It really did operate like the magical piece of paper sitting on a table, in a manner of speaking. They had something akin to a language, that could quite literally execute itself, at least in the presence of a very specific type of field. The language, a term I am still using very loosely, is a system of symbolsâ?? etc.
So we know from Isaac that fields activate the technology and that symbols are used interactively to give context to the function and purpose of this technology. The S1 artefact is one technological means of generating a field and controlling the antigravity technology, but there may be others â?? including fields generated by biological origin. From my interpretation of Isaacâ??s account, he had no interaction with these.
Reading Isaacâ??s account again I thought Iâ??d repost some of his final words â??I'd also like to say that for what it's worth, during my time there I never heard anything about invasions, or abductions, or many of the more frightening topics that often pop up on Coast to Coast AM. That's not to say that none of it is true, but in my time working alongside some of the most well-connected people in this field, it never came up. So at the very least I can say my intent is not to scare anyone. My view on the extra-terrestrial situation is very much a positive, albiet still highly secretive one.
One thing I can definitely say is that if they wanted us gone, we would have been gone a very, very long time ago, and we wouldn't even have seen it coming. Throw out your ideas about a space war or anything silly like that. We'd be capable of fighting back against them about as much as ants could fight back against a stampede of buffalo. But that's OK. We're the primitive race, they're the advanced races, and that's just the way it is. The other advanced races let them live through their primitive years back in their day, and there's no reason to think it will be any different for us.â??
