Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
So, you're saying that this is not an all or nothing (real or fake) release of information. I suppose there could be grains of truth somewhere in there which just makes it all that more confusing.

"the phony art" and lettering is not just on the LAP drawings, it is also on the sides of the BB drone and Raj drone. So it seem like a large effort of misinformation just to release the RSR concept.

Yes, I agree RSR is an interesting concept, and it seems to have already been achieved to some degree with quantum locking (Flux pinning) as shown in this video example:



Someone is highly motivated to release a bundle of information that has the potential to change how humanity fundamentally views the universe, with the goal of maximizing acceptance of the information.  But knowing in advance that it will be extremely controversial and thus subject to outright rejection by large segments of society thereby threatening its existence.  What is the best strategy for doing that?  The answer is as old as politics.  You simply give everyone involved a piece of what they're looking for.  The false choice.  Around the kernel of truth, which the believers will eventually find and embrace, you also layer lots of cellulite to feed the skeptics as well.  You give them plenty of fat to chew on because their participation is also a vital part of keeping the meme alive.  To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.  This is what I mean by multi-layered.  If RSR was the core revelation, and the original bundle of information was just about that, a few pages from a CARET report with a couple of photos of what looks like a plastic model, no LAP diagrams, no photos, no Isaac emails, etc, would we still be talking about this like we are now 20+ years later? 
2
For what it's worth, I've always considered the LAP drawings to be a dubious and disjoint aspect of this epic.  They are fun, the renderings themselves are excellent productions, and the actual original motive for making them might be interesting in its own right (concept art for some sci-fi movie maybe, with lettering added after the fact? etc.)  But in my mind they have always been over-stylized for their stated purpose, and from a functional perspective they suffer from issues that I believe would prevent them from serving as an active technical specification for a device.  Including but not limited to overlapping/intersecting and not-fully-joined "lines of connectivity" and gratuitous artsy elements such as the shadings of the octal junction.  Sure, it could be sufficiently advanced technology that to me only looks like art (instead of magic), but I'm inclined to lean toward the simpler explanation which is they are just works of art for emotional effect.

That said, I do not think phony art would take away from what in my regard is the most important component of the entire kit, which is as I've always suspected a clever and multilayered work of disclosure psyops.  That is the information about RSR as described in the Q4-86, which I believe is the only ground-breaking revelation and the only technology involved that fits my personal beliefs of how alien vehicles might actually be implemented.  It is brilliantly simple in concept, as most fundamental innovations are, and it is truly and sufficiently alien.

So, you're saying that this is not an all or nothing (real or fake) release of information. I suppose there could be grains of truth somewhere in there which just makes it all that more confusing.

"the phony art" and lettering is not just on the LAP drawings, it is also on the sides of the BB drone and Raj drone. So it seem like a large effort of misinformation just to release the RSR concept.

Yes, I agree RSR is an interesting concept, and it seems to have already been achieved to some degree with quantum locking (Flux pinning) as shown in this video example:



3
For what it's worth, I've always considered the LAP drawings to be a dubious and disjoint aspect of this epic.  They are fun, the renderings themselves are excellent productions, and the actual original motive for making them might be interesting in its own right (concept art for some sci-fi movie maybe, with lettering added after the fact? etc.)  But in my mind they have always been over-stylized for their stated purpose, and from a functional perspective they suffer from issues that I believe would prevent them from serving as an active technical specification for a device.  Including but not limited to overlapping/intersecting and not-fully-joined "lines of connectivity" and gratuitous artsy elements such as the shadings of the octal junction.  Sure, it could be sufficiently advanced technology that to me only looks like art (instead of magic), but I'm inclined to lean toward the simpler explanation which is they are just works of art for emotional effect.

That said, I do not think phony art would take away from what in my regard is the most important component of the entire kit, which is as I've always suspected a clever and multilayered work of disclosure psyops.  That is the information about RSR as described in the Q4-86, which I believe is the only ground-breaking revelation and the only technology involved that fits my personal beliefs of how alien vehicles might actually be implemented.  It is brilliantly simple in concept, as most fundamental innovations are, and it is truly and sufficiently alien.
4
General discussion / "Doughnut" shaped ufo's spotted in England.
« Last post by Hamish on June 27, 2021, 02:25:39 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7j04KyWfcM Pretty interesting spotted a month ago over England UK. Im pretty sure i can see appendages on one of the ufo's aswell as there central hole around the 0:28 mark as the ufo rotates.
5
News / Re: Witness comes forward: Christian Morin
« Last post by Hamish on May 09, 2021, 01:20:18 PM »
exciting news!
can't wait to hear his story.
did he take any pictures?
Hi spinnewise. Unfortunately all attempts to contact the CARET/Dragonfly Drones Facebook page administratior and Christian have been unsuccessful. Itching to hear more of his story.
6
News / Re: Witness comes forward: Christian Morin
« Last post by spinnewise on May 04, 2021, 07:54:02 PM »
exciting news!
can't wait to hear his story.
did he take any pictures?
7
News / Witness comes forward: Christian Morin
« Last post by onthefence on April 30, 2021, 06:39:14 PM »
A new witness came forward recently. I was informed on 2021-04-30 about this, and it appears that it showed up 4w ago:



Anyone with access to Facebook might "type caret/ dragonfly drones into Facebook it will bring up their page". and hopefully encourage this person to come here and tell more of their story./
8
General discussion / Re: VonStern Magazine
« Last post by spinnewise on April 05, 2021, 05:22:08 PM »
happy Easter everyone!
9
General discussion / Re: VonStern Magazine
« Last post by onthefence on April 01, 2021, 03:02:49 PM »
I'm back!

Happy Easter everyone!

-EVS

Happy Easter to you too!

10
Drone related? / Re: Bob Lazar - UFO - Propulsion - S-4, Area 51
« Last post by DroneTeamNews on February 27, 2020, 07:41:55 AM »

The whole thing fascinated me, especially these two "CARET" related items:

Strange writing mentioned at the 27:22 mark
"At one point in time when the disk was energized, one of the archways became transparent and you could see the area outside of it just if the archway was a window. After the panel had been transparent for a while, a form of writing which was unlike alphabetic scientific or mathematical symbols I had ever seen began to appear on the transparent archway, and I was never informed as to how all of this was achieved."


Invisibility mode mentioned at 31.36 mark:
"When gravity field is on ... the disk can't be seen from any vantage point , and for all practical purposes is invisible. "

For reference, here is simple comparison of symbols drawn by Bob Lazar to the CARET symbols.


Also, from earlier posts:

The iBeam symbols drawn by Jesse Marcel Jr


Also, compare the design elements of the CARET / LAP symbols to those recalled by Betty Hill.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_and_Barney_Hill_abduction
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10