Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Did i hear correctly that a member on this site claimed to have had a sighting and even posted photos?. It later turned out that all of his photos of the sighting were faked?. Around the 31.02 mark.
I'm asking because its the first time i heard about it i've yet to find the afore mentioned post.


https://youtu.be/k-bEJ2R0dlM?t=1863
12
Indeed a nice recap, brings back memories  :)
13
Here is a respectable video recap of the case from the "John Lang" channel:

Did We Discover An Alien Language? The Most Well Documented UFO Case





14
Theories and Speculation / Re: Printing algorithms into spinglas
« Last post by spinnewise on April 05, 2022, 02:57:14 pm »
Yepp, that's what I'm thinking too.
Maybe they finally succeeded in reverse engineering it?

15
Theories and Speculation / Re: Printing algorithms into spinglas
« Last post by Hamish on April 05, 2022, 04:44:53 am »
fantatsic find. Seems like issac mightve been telling the truth all along about the symbols acting as a sort of functional blue print.  ;D
16
Theories and Speculation / Printing algorithms into spinglas
« Last post by spinnewise on March 29, 2022, 11:07:42 pm »
Found this article today

Printing circuits on rare nanomagnets puts a new spin on computing
by Los Alamos National Laboratory
https://phys.org/news/2022-03-circuits-rare-nanomagnets.html

New research artificially creating a rare form of matter known as spin glass could spark a new paradigm in artificial intelligence by allowing algorithms to be directly printed as physical hardware. The unusual properties of spin glass enable a form of AI that can recognize objects from partial images much like the brain does and show promise for low-power computing, among other intriguing capabilities.

"Our work accomplished the first experimental realization of an artificial spin glass consisting of nanomagnets arranged to replicate a neural network," said Michael Saccone, a post-doctoral researcher in theoretical physics at Los Alamos National Laboratory and lead author of the new paper in Nature Physics. "Our paper lays the groundwork we need to use these physical systems practically."
.......
17
General discussion / Symbols - Tic Tacs & Issac
« Last post by danblast on August 21, 2021, 07:19:28 am »
I was watch some old UFO episodes on the History Channel and the Kecksburg event was reviewed then the Rendelsham Forest.

It got me thinking Kecksburg, Rendelsham and even the ancient Japanese UFO event all described similar writing to that of the drones. It makes me think about the drone language even more after rewatching this. Then I started thinking is Isacc going to come out of hiding soon.

I'm wondering if Issac will hopefully re-emerge now that the tic tac event, AAtip and so much attention is now bringing UFO's back into the public eye.
18
General discussion / LAP in crop circles? Symbols at military base?
« Last post by Qwanta on August 09, 2021, 05:30:07 am »
I was searching for any examples of the LAP symbols in crop circles and I hit a peculiar conversation on Reddit that briefly mentions crop circles but is mostly about some odd symbols found on the ground at some military base.  First question, does anyone know of examples of LAP-like symbols in crop circles, and 2nd question, does anyone recognize the symbols they are talking about in the photos of the original post? https://www.reddit.com/r/googleearthsecrets/comments/obaxrf/weird_stuff_in_the_nevada_desert_near_the_carson/
19
So, you're saying that this is not an all or nothing (real or fake) release of information. I suppose there could be grains of truth somewhere in there which just makes it all that more confusing.

"the phony art" and lettering is not just on the LAP drawings, it is also on the sides of the BB drone and Raj drone. So it seem like a large effort of misinformation just to release the RSR concept.

Yes, I agree RSR is an interesting concept, and it seems to have already been achieved to some degree with quantum locking (Flux pinning) as shown in this video example:



Someone is highly motivated to release a bundle of information that has the potential to change how humanity fundamentally views the universe, with the goal of maximizing acceptance of the information.  But knowing in advance that it will be extremely controversial and thus subject to outright rejection by large segments of society thereby threatening its existence.  What is the best strategy for doing that?  The answer is as old as politics.  You simply give everyone involved a piece of what they're looking for.  The false choice.  Around the kernel of truth, which the believers will eventually find and embrace, you also layer lots of cellulite to feed the skeptics as well.  You give them plenty of fat to chew on because their participation is also a vital part of keeping the meme alive.  To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.  This is what I mean by multi-layered.  If RSR was the core revelation, and the original bundle of information was just about that, a few pages from a CARET report with a couple of photos of what looks like a plastic model, no LAP diagrams, no photos, no Isaac emails, etc, would we still be talking about this like we are now 20+ years later? 
20
For what it's worth, I've always considered the LAP drawings to be a dubious and disjoint aspect of this epic.  They are fun, the renderings themselves are excellent productions, and the actual original motive for making them might be interesting in its own right (concept art for some sci-fi movie maybe, with lettering added after the fact? etc.)  But in my mind they have always been over-stylized for their stated purpose, and from a functional perspective they suffer from issues that I believe would prevent them from serving as an active technical specification for a device.  Including but not limited to overlapping/intersecting and not-fully-joined "lines of connectivity" and gratuitous artsy elements such as the shadings of the octal junction.  Sure, it could be sufficiently advanced technology that to me only looks like art (instead of magic), but I'm inclined to lean toward the simpler explanation which is they are just works of art for emotional effect.

That said, I do not think phony art would take away from what in my regard is the most important component of the entire kit, which is as I've always suspected a clever and multilayered work of disclosure psyops.  That is the information about RSR as described in the Q4-86, which I believe is the only ground-breaking revelation and the only technology involved that fits my personal beliefs of how alien vehicles might actually be implemented.  It is brilliantly simple in concept, as most fundamental innovations are, and it is truly and sufficiently alien.

So, you're saying that this is not an all or nothing (real or fake) release of information. I suppose there could be grains of truth somewhere in there which just makes it all that more confusing.

"the phony art" and lettering is not just on the LAP drawings, it is also on the sides of the BB drone and Raj drone. So it seem like a large effort of misinformation just to release the RSR concept.

Yes, I agree RSR is an interesting concept, and it seems to have already been achieved to some degree with quantum locking (Flux pinning) as shown in this video example:



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10